Started By
Message

re: Which football program will be better the next 25 years: Texas A&M or Arkansas?

Posted on 12/29/12 at 12:25 am to
Posted by DWag215
Houston, TX
Member since Aug 2011
7427 posts
Posted on 12/29/12 at 12:25 am to
quote:

13 isn't enough games to determine that 66 is Pretty simple

No we get it. The standard applies except for when it doesn't.
Posted by Gladius Veritas
Fayetteville, Arkansas
Member since May 2012
13189 posts
Posted on 12/29/12 at 12:25 am to
Sorry you lack common sense

Posted by SECTexasPride
College Station
Member since Dec 2012
32 posts
Posted on 12/29/12 at 12:27 am to
Texas A&M is a flagship school, has a massive alumni base, the biggest endowment in the SEC, 100k+ stadium in 2015, 50k student population, one of the most passionate fan bases in college football, and top facilities and is recruiting at an extremely, extremely high level. And located in a recruiting hotbed in between Austin, Houston, and Dallas. It is laughable to think Arkansas will have a better record over the next 25 years.
This post was edited on 12/29/12 at 12:28 am
Posted by bdelarosa7
Dallas, TX
Member since Nov 2012
1661 posts
Posted on 12/29/12 at 12:27 am to
quote:

A&M relegated to living vicariously through other teams Well I'll be. Color me shocked


Nice deflect.

No need to be angry. We're trying to tackle a very serious issue here.

Oh, btw:
quote:

More wins, conference championships, national championships, bowl wins, heismans, money, facilities, educational prowess, size, etc, etc...

This post was edited on 12/29/12 at 12:29 am
Posted by DWag215
Houston, TX
Member since Aug 2011
7427 posts
Posted on 12/29/12 at 12:28 am to
quote:

Sorry you lack common sense

The more remote in time the games occurred the better? That's why 66 is more probative than 13?

Help this poor Aggy -- devoid of common sense.
This post was edited on 12/29/12 at 12:29 am
Posted by Gladius Veritas
Fayetteville, Arkansas
Member since May 2012
13189 posts
Posted on 12/29/12 at 12:29 am to
quote:

Texas A&M is a flagship school,


Your ship is more like an oar boat

Ours is a fricking high tech dreadnought
Posted by Gladius Veritas
Fayetteville, Arkansas
Member since May 2012
13189 posts
Posted on 12/29/12 at 12:30 am to
quote:

The more remote in time the games occurred the better?


You wanna do recent games?

This post was edited on 12/29/12 at 12:32 am
Posted by sorantable
Member since Dec 2008
53269 posts
Posted on 12/29/12 at 12:30 am to
A&M trying to flagship now?

This is getting rich!
Posted by bdelarosa7
Dallas, TX
Member since Nov 2012
1661 posts
Posted on 12/29/12 at 12:31 am to
Ol' Miss?

Posted by DWag215
Houston, TX
Member since Aug 2011
7427 posts
Posted on 12/29/12 at 12:32 am to
quote:

Your ship is more like an oar boat

One with a $7 (or is it $8?) billion endowment. That can buy some pretty sick oars (mahogany?).
Posted by sorantable
Member since Dec 2008
53269 posts
Posted on 12/29/12 at 12:32 am to
quote:

Ol' Miss

still BIG12 at heart. It's Ole Miss, bitch
Posted by Gladius Veritas
Fayetteville, Arkansas
Member since May 2012
13189 posts
Posted on 12/29/12 at 12:33 am to
Oh no endowment

Still hasn't translated to wins
Posted by bdelarosa7
Dallas, TX
Member since Nov 2012
1661 posts
Posted on 12/29/12 at 12:34 am to
quote:

You wanna do recent games?


I liked your edit to remove "20 years good enough?"

I see what you did there - because the 3-2 record you have on us in the last 20 isn't fitting to your previous arguments.

Shifty, shifty..

Arkansas....
Posted by bdelarosa7
Dallas, TX
Member since Nov 2012
1661 posts
Posted on 12/29/12 at 12:35 am to
quote:

It's Ole Miss, bitch


Sorry.

Ole Miss?
Posted by Gladius Veritas
Fayetteville, Arkansas
Member since May 2012
13189 posts
Posted on 12/29/12 at 12:36 am to
Erm, in the last 20 years we're 3-1 against you

So no, it does support my argument. I just edited because the past 4 years sounded better
Posted by DWag215
Houston, TX
Member since Aug 2011
7427 posts
Posted on 12/29/12 at 12:36 am to
quote:

You wanna do recent games?

I'm sure you mean the ones that only occurred before 2012. You know, where each team boasted a different coach and different players.

After all, we're talking the future, right?

Current staffs, players,and recruits do nothing but distort your clear, logical analysis based exclusively on historical records, right?

I too find our freshman Heisman winner, star-studded 2013 and 2014 recruiting classes, and SEC coach of the year beside the point.
This post was edited on 12/29/12 at 12:38 am
Posted by Gladius Veritas
Fayetteville, Arkansas
Member since May 2012
13189 posts
Posted on 12/29/12 at 12:37 am to
No, I'll count that one

After all it does drastically improve your winning percentage in recent games from 0 to 25

Posted by sorantable
Member since Dec 2008
53269 posts
Posted on 12/29/12 at 12:37 am to
quote:

Ole Miss?

Yes.
Posted by ImperialPalace
Galveston, Texas
Member since Oct 2012
2888 posts
Posted on 12/29/12 at 12:38 am to


So much fail in this thread. Sail on, our fellow SWC brethren. Try as you might, you can't run away from the cold hard facts:
quote:

More wins, conference championships, national championships, bowl wins, heismans, money, facilities, educational prowess, size, etc, etc...
Posted by sorantable
Member since Dec 2008
53269 posts
Posted on 12/29/12 at 12:39 am to
quote:

More wins, conference championships, national championships, bowl wins, heismans, money, facilities, educational prowess, size, etc, etc...

generalized shenanigans
Jump to page
Page First 26 27 28 29 30 ... 35
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 28 of 35Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter