Lol...

You pointed out Auburns wins in Tuscaloosa have came vs bad Bama teams.

I pointed out the Bama wins in 09 and 11 vs bad Auburn teams in JHS.

Basically an Auburn fan could use your exact same argument.

Seems to me that you might be too stupid for this conversation.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by elposter

Member since Dec 2010

24904 posts

Posted on 8/20/15 at 4:01 pm to NYCAuburn

quote:
and you go on to list one side's shitty teams or mitigate a loss because the other team was really good that year but fail to recognize the opposite in the Alabama wining years. Why? because it lessens your argument. Yes better teams win, that is not the point of the OP, Alabama seems to lose to AU in BDS. You can come up with all the excuses you want, they dont refute that simple fact.

Damn, you really don't get it. Hard for me to believe.

The post I was responding to was about why Auburn has won so much in BDS. The main reason is because Auburn has been good those year and Alabama has been bad. It's a really simple an non-confrontational point.

quote:
and you go on to list one side's shitty teams or mitigate a loss because the other team was really good that year but fail to recognize the opposite in the Alabama wining years.

Why the hell would I be talking about years when Alabama has won when the topic is about why Auburn has won? Do you seriously not understand this?

quote:
Why? because it lessens your argument.

Good Alabama teams beating shitty Auburn teams lessons my argument about good Auburn teams beating shitty Alabama teams? No, no it doesn't. If anything it strengthens my point which is, again, that better teams win.

quote:
Yes better teams win

Oh so you do agree with me.

quote:
that is not the point of the OP

The point of the OP was to ask which stadium your team had the worst luck in. The post I was responding to you said Alabama's poor record against Auburn in BDS is "strange/bizarre." I merely stated that no it's really not strange/bizarre when you consider Auburn's winning BDS teams have been good to really good against predominantly average to bad Alabama teams. Then you guys started going full retard talking about years the game was played in Auburn (irrelevant) and years that Alabama won (also irrelevant). Again we are talking about why Auburn has such a good record in BDS.

quote:
You can come up with all the excuses you want

What the hell are you talking about? I basically said Auburn has a good record against Alabama in BDS because they have been better than Alabama. You interpret that as an "excuse"? Alrighty then.

quote:
they dont refute that simple fact.

I'm not "refuting" any fact at all actually.

Get it now?

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by elposter

Member since Dec 2010

24904 posts

Posted on 8/20/15 at 4:11 pm to boXerrumble

quote:
You pointed out Auburns wins in Tuscaloosa have came vs bad Bama teams.

I pointed out the Bama wins in 09 and 11 vs bad Auburn teams in JHS.

Basically an Auburn fan could use your exact same argument.

Seems to me that you might be too stupid for this conversation.

God damn, I feel like I'm arguing with children.

quote:
You pointed out Auburns wins in Tuscaloosa have came vs bad Bama teams.

Yes, that is my point. The poster I was responding to found it strange/bizarre that Alabama had a poor record until recently against Auburn in Tuscaloosa. I merely made the point that I don't find it bizarre strange because during this time period Auburn was good to very good and Alabama was average to bad. It's a really simple point.

quote:
I pointed out the Bama wins in 09 and 11 vs bad Auburn teams in JHS.

Yes, and that has absolutely nothing to do with why Auburn has a good record in BDS which is the topic.

quote:
Basically an Auburn fan could use your exact same argument.

My "argument" is that better teams usually win so it's not surprising (or "strange/bizarre") that Auburn had a great record in BDS during the early 2000s. I agree that good Alabama teams beat average to shitty Auburn teams in 2009 and 2011. You act as if this somehow discredits my "argument" or something. It actually strengthens my "argument" which, again, is that it is not bizarre/strange that better teams win most of the time.

Page 1 2 3 4