Started By
Message
1
Posted on 2/28/23 at 8:20 am to EarlyCuyler3
quote:Clue me in? What is your experience with these investigations?
You people are just completely clueless how investigations work.
quote:Why do you think this about me? I’ve been nothing but complimentary about Bama’s basketball season and Miller’s ability and performance this season up until about a week ago.
And if they had issued the exact statement you just typed out, you'd still find something to bitch about.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 8:23 am to WDE24
The state usually doesn't just announce all their info before the trial.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 8:23 am to bogeypro
quote:
Please use actual facts from the case to make your claim.
See the deflection folks. It's astounding.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 8:26 am to EarlyCuyler3
quote:Ok. Are you saying the statement that I suggested would offer an explanation of why Miller wasn’t charged is releasing all of their info or any info that would be damaging to their case?
The state usually doesn't just announce all their info before the trial.
They have to provide their evidence to the defense. There is no trial by surprise, especially in criminal cases.
Providing information about why someone is just a witness and not a defendant seems in bounds to me.
This post was edited on 2/28/23 at 8:29 am
Posted on 2/28/23 at 8:27 am to WDE24
quote:
They have to provide their evidence to the defense.
The forum and it's users aren't the defense.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 8:30 am to Razorback Reverend
quote:
He made a terrible decision
See...this is where we disagree. According to the police, he did not make a terrible decision. In an incident like the one that occurred in January, if he had indeed made a terrible decision he would have been charged with a crime due to the fact that a human being was murdered. According to the police, he was not involved and is considered a witness. You are essentially arguing for him to sit the rest of the season for witnessing a criminal act.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 8:30 am to EarlyCuyler3
quote:No kidding. The point is, that providing an explanation regarding the decision not to prosecute Miller would be highly unlikely to harm their case against the other defendants.
The forum and it's users aren't the defense.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 8:36 am to WDE24
quote:
providing an explanation regarding the decision not to prosecute Miller would be highly unlikely to harm their case
Why do you think the police owe us an explanation? Because of our curiosity? Even if they were to release a point-by-point statement today, with video and forensic evidence, it still would not be good enough for the vast majority of Miller's detractors.
Everything will come out at trial.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 8:37 am to WDE24
quote:
The point is, that providing an explanation regarding the decision not to prosecute Miller would be highly unlikely to harm their case against the other defendants.
Maybe, maybe not. They're erring on the side of caution. And as much as ya'll want this to be some huge deal, it's really not in the grand scheme of things.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 8:37 am to RollTide1987
quote:
Why do you think the police owe us an explanation? Because of our curiosity? Even if they were to release a point-by-point statement today, with video and forensic evidence, it still would not be good enough for the vast majority of Miller's detractors. Everything will come out at trial.
Exactly
Posted on 2/28/23 at 8:37 am to Razorback Reverend
So don’t hang out with your team mates. Got it
Posted on 2/28/23 at 8:38 am to RollTide1987
quote:
You are essentially arguing for him to sit the rest of the season for witnessing a criminal act.
Sweet Jesus even the guy who hates basketball is delusional
Posted on 2/28/23 at 8:40 am to Sun God
quote:
Sweet Jesus even the guy who hates basketball...
I don't know about you, but when the guy who wouldn't lose sleep over our basketball program being shut down is against you, I'd start asking questions.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 8:40 am to RollTide1987
quote:First, I didn’t say they owed it. Second, the elected, politician DA probably does owe an explanation of the decision not to prosecute.
Why do you think the police owe us an explanation?
quote:Because public trust. Because accountability. Because a police detective’s sworn testimony implicated him.
Because of our curiosity?
Posted on 2/28/23 at 8:41 am to EarlyCuyler3
quote:They didn’t even say that. You don’t know that.
They're erring on the side of caution.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 8:41 am to WDE24
quote:
Because public trust. Because accountability. Because a police detective’s sworn testimony implicated him.
First time following an investigation, huh? You seem to think those things matter to police.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 8:42 am to WDE24
That’s what the grand jury is for.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 8:43 am to Woody4daTide9
quote:They aren’t presenting it to the grand jury.
That’s what the grand jury is for.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 8:45 am to WDE24
quote:
They aren’t presenting it to the grand jury.
quote:
"The court, having heard the evidence in a preliminary hearing, finds sufficient evidence was presented to establish probable cause that the offense charged was committed by the Defendant," Jannik wrote in Miles' ruling. "The matter is bound over to the Grand Jury."
At least you are consistent in not having a clue what you're talking about.
Page 3 of 16
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News