Started By
Message
re: To all the SEC fans who claim the PAC-10/12 is pathetic need to see this
Posted on 8/13/11 at 1:13 am to DucksflyinPAC
Posted on 8/13/11 at 1:13 am to DucksflyinPAC
Wtf?....ur trolling ur balls off right now
Posted on 8/13/11 at 1:15 am to Lee County Tiger
quote:
That's because Football is won with defense. Something you Pac 10 fricks don't understand.
That is not true. Man, it sure is fun demolishing all these normal SEC myths you guys have down there.
Football is won by who has more points on the board at the end of the game over the other. A team with the most crappy D, if they put up tons of points can still win a game or even a championship. Thus the moto "Defenses win Championships is a myth". Neither a D or a O is any more important asset to any single team. That was a myth slogan created years ago by SEC schools because the SEC could not have a Offense to save their lives and they wanted to highlight their great D. But since you are bringing up D, last year Oregon had the #12 D for giving up points, LSU was #11. However UO had the #1 O in points. And last time I checked it is points, having more then the other is what decides a winner. And LSU had, um,,,, pretty bad. Oregon just happens to have a great O and D, both things.
Posted on 8/13/11 at 1:16 am to DucksflyinPAC
quote:I'm no expert but when a team goes 2-10 that probably means they are fricking terrible. Your troll efforts failed miserably.
Who cares. I posted the records and what they were ranked at the time of play. Its not a PAC teams fault that after they smash a SEC that it crushes their spirits and they go on to have a rest bad of year. Oregon is ranked #3 right now. LSU is 4th. Is anyone denying that LSU is not a very hard team to face right now? I thought not. Well, and then what happens if UO beats LSU so bad that it crushes their spirits and crushes their hope for the rest of the season and they go on to not win a single game. But pointing out the records at the time they played not seem fair? It shows how big or not a certain game is when they play. Any one with honestly would say going to play LSU in Dallas will be hard. But who knows what the rest of the season for LSU will hold? Can we just then go back into history and rewrite it and pretend it was not hard? That is what you are doing in your posts.
You all do double spin much. For last year before we played Tenn, every single SEC fan said Oregon was over-rated and Tenn would crush us at that night game at Tenn. They boasted on how much that SEC Defense was going to crush us in half and how the SEC equals the NFL junior league and bla, bla, bla. Then, UO beats Tenn so bad it was the worst home defeat ever for Tenn. As a result UGA up and immediately cancels their already scheduled home/home with us. And then through the season all SEC fans said of Oregon, "but who did you play? Who did you play really? You just scheduled crap teams". And thus, how is it our fault that we beat Tenn so bad that we ruined their entire season?
And then for the title game, all SEC fans said UO was going to get so smoked vs AU and that Cam would run all over us and that our QB would get cut in half. Well, A)we would lose by only as time expired on a game winning FG. B)Cam Newgon did not run all over us. We actually held him. C)our QB was never injured by that team SEC D, however Cam Newton sure was at the start of the 4th quarter by that UO D that freaking hit him so hard.
And now. New season, but same old SEC fan bullshite with going to be playing LSU. Oh ya, LSU is going to pound the crap out of UO, cut their QB in half, pound us into tomorrow. Bla, Bla, Bla. I think we have heard this before, twice now. And both times you could not of been proved more wrong. So forgive me if I do not eat the bullshite this time around. This is not our first Rodeo there boys.
Posted on 8/13/11 at 1:16 am to PeterPan
quote:
Tiger Stadium Overall Record:
392-143-18 (.719)
LINK
Whats Autzen's?
Hey duck fan get I get an answer
Posted on 8/13/11 at 1:17 am to Robot Santa
quote:
I too am willing to sacrifice what would be a glorious Tiger Rant meltdown to shut these fricking hippies up.
Who said I was a hippy? Are you a inbreed hick?
Posted on 8/13/11 at 1:18 am to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
DucksflyinPAC
who is this queer?
Posted on 8/13/11 at 1:19 am to Rohan2Reed
quote:He has been arguing that the PAC Shits are better than the SEC for multiple pages and failing miserable. I hope LSU beats the shite out of these fricks.
who is this queer?
Posted on 8/13/11 at 1:20 am to PRK
quote:
Yeah, it might be wise to accrue a few championships before you embark on such a lofty endeavor.
Someone write this down and forward it to: Chancellor Daniel W. Jones, MD P.O. Box 1848 Oxford, MS 38677
I have to admit. I spit up my beer on my monitor from laughing so hard with that one. lol
But naaaaaa. Give him a break. This is a sports board. No one should give a flip over spelling errors on a sports board. That is as cheesy as it gets. But your post was a good one, for sure.
Posted on 8/13/11 at 1:20 am to Rohan2Reed
quote:He is a trollish duck.
Rohan2Reed
Posted on 8/13/11 at 1:21 am to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
DucksflyinPAC
This post was edited on 8/13/11 at 1:22 am
Posted on 8/13/11 at 1:22 am to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
other tough PAC schools
this is the point your missing...there is no tough pac schools
i laughed at this statement...im still laughing
Posted on 8/13/11 at 1:25 am to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
Oregon just happens to have a great O and D
Posted on 8/13/11 at 1:28 am to DucksflyinPAC
Now we have gotten to what has fueled this tool in this thread for so long...the brewhans
Posted on 8/13/11 at 1:34 am to PRK
quote:
LSU played UNC and WVU last season. We play you and WVU in Morgantown this season. Bama is playing a home-and-home with Penn State UGA is playing Boise State Seems a little more high profile than the cake walks you people have been setting up.
Now PRK. Be a logical feller now wont ya. I am surprised you did not list the annual UF-FSU game. With many teams in the SEC one can find a one game exception with many of them. (or two for LSU last year, and this year as well). But that does not even come close to the overall PAC's schedule year in, year out. And we only play 3 OOC/year and yet we still as a whole play less cupcakes. Just off the top of my head last year we played, TCU/BSU/Top Big team(and this was only 1 team who did this, Oregon St.) WISKY, Nebraska, Texas, BYU, Iowa, ND, Okie St. ect. ect. ect.
The PAC always tries to play the top schools from every Conference when they schedule. Do you really think in Gods green world that Alabama or Florida would ever schedule a game with us? Florida has not even played any single OOC game outside the state of Florida for over 20 years. The only SEC team that has balls with scheduling is LSU, and a few years back Tenn had balls too. Tenn just last year around the time of our game went live and admitted they are changing the way they do scheduling and going away from more risky games in the future and dropped a planned home/home with UNC. So honestly, only LSU has balls left, sorry. Its probably from all the other SEC teams this past decade that got humiliated by losing to PAC teams like Bama, AU, Tenn, MIss St, Arky. Its funny as soon as these teams started getting spanked by PAC teams you don't ever see those same SEC teams want to schedule any more PAC games. lol, funny isn't it.
You watch and see. If LSU loses to Oregon there will be a hundred thousand fans screaming bloody murder at the LSU AD for scheduling this game and pressuring him not not play a PAC team again. The only reason LSU took this game on is because so far this past decade LSU has not lost(but the last 3 times the PAC played LSU hard). Losing to UO will change all that. I hope not. But history with the SEC says otherwise.
And then the PAC will just continue doing what they always do: Scheduling hard.
Posted on 8/13/11 at 1:39 am to oklahogjr
quote:
ASU had 6 wins but two were to D-2 schools because they got screwed over by a major school bailing on them at the very last min
so let me get this straight they beat 4 teams last year that were D-1.... and yet you think they would have beat the major school they had scheduled? Sounds to me like that school dropped them to get a better SOS.
ASU played Wisky last year at Wisky. So ASU is hardly afraid of scheduling hard ranter. But nice try. And oh, this year ASU has Wisky again but also Missouri at Missouri. And that right there is 2 out of 3 games that are super hard.
When will SEC fans stop with making up shite that they have no clue what they are talking about?
Posted on 8/13/11 at 1:40 am to DucksflyinPAC
quote:you do that the sec will keep winning national championships
And then the PAC will just continue doing what they always do: Scheduling hard
Posted on 8/13/11 at 1:42 am to DucksflyinPAC
LSU vs. Pac-10
Opponent Series Record First, Last Meeting
Arizona 3-0-0 1984, 2006
Arizona St. 1-0-0 2005
Oregon 1-0-0 1977
Oregon St. 4-0-0 1976, 2004
Southern Cal 1-1-0 1979, 1984
Stanford 0-1-0 1977
Washington 2-0-0 1983, 2009
That makes LSU vs Pac-10, equate to Sergio Oliva forearms and symmetry.
Opponent Series Record First, Last Meeting
Arizona 3-0-0 1984, 2006
Arizona St. 1-0-0 2005
Oregon 1-0-0 1977
Oregon St. 4-0-0 1976, 2004
Southern Cal 1-1-0 1979, 1984
Stanford 0-1-0 1977
Washington 2-0-0 1983, 2009
That makes LSU vs Pac-10, equate to Sergio Oliva forearms and symmetry.
Posted on 8/13/11 at 1:49 am to oklahogjr
quote:
Look at Miss ST's schedule this year and name me one remote of a challenge of a game they have to face this year.
They have 4 ranked opponents in their division alone.
And that right there is called Circular reasoning. Miss st. does not have to play anybody OOC but then can lose to the SEC teams. And then those SEC teams that beat Miss ST. can claim they were good because they beat Miss St. That is classic Circular Reasoning at its finest. Having a team(or Conference)not play anyone outside its Conference then get to pretend they proved themselves all the while being too scared to play anyone OOC for fear of losing all while try to pad extra wins to make a bowl game. The SEC has the slickest trick. It gets so many many SEC teams preseason ranked into the system(without having to prove anything, ie Georgia this year ect..) and when they start losing to each other on paper it looks fine because, heck, they only lost to a "ranked" team. Ya, each other. So they all look good. But then when you pull them out of their Conference you get Ole Miss Losing to a D-2 school, Tenn Losing to Oregon, UGA losing to a terrible Colorado, and also to a joke of a non BCS AQ school, Vandy losing OOC, and many others losing in bowl games at the end of the year. And then the following year, you have the media, who you have a fat contract with, to pump you all up again and you get your whole Conference all pre season ranked. And the same thing happens again. In time, when you are forced, even though you don't want to, play a out of Conference decent team, you lose, and that just shows how overrated you really are. But hey, Miss St. really only lost to "ranked" teams they say. Ya, look at their OOC schedule. Who did they have to play? If they had Oregon St's schedule from last year they would of lost all 3 of those OOC games for sure. And then Miss St. would not of went bowling. Oh, I see. Its a rigged system. Yep.
Posted on 8/13/11 at 1:53 am to hubris
quote:
Your whole conference is a cupcake.
If so then why do we(PAC-10) when we face off on the field with you(SEC) win more often this last century?
Posted on 8/13/11 at 1:56 am to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
If so then why do we(PAC-10) when we face off on the field with you(SEC) win more often this last century?
how many games did you guys win that actually mattered?
Popular
Back to top


0





