I don't think they are the same athletically. Arch's stats are that bad because Sark keeps trying to put him in an offensive scheme he is not comfortable with. When Arch is following the script, the first 20 plus plays they practiced all week, he rolls. When the script runs out and Sark starts wanting to run whatever he deems whether it fits Arch's strengths or not, that's when the wheels come off the bus..

After the script runs out he should just simplify the offense. Give Arch plays where he only has 2 progressions on the same side of the field.. If the receivers aren't open just run it if that is open, or dump it off to a Running Back or Tight End in the flat if that is open.

This post was edited on 10/26/26 at 8:57 pm

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by geauxbrown

Louisiana

Member since Oct 2006

30422 posts

Posted on 10/26/26 at 6:42 pm to tBrand

quote:
but Manning's ceiling is much higher

Is that your professional opinion?

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Hornish Kin

Member since Jul 2022

252 posts

Posted on 10/26/26 at 8:46 pm to geauxbrown

He’s right. But the willfully blind can’t/won’t see. Arch has the tools to be great. Mateer shows zero signs. I saw 10 passes during the Ole Miss game that demonstrate this. But whatever makes you feel good.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by geauxbrown

Louisiana

Member since Oct 2006

30422 posts

Posted on 10/26/26 at 8:48 pm to Hornish Kin

quote:
He’s right. But the willfully blind can’t/won’t see. Arch has the tools to be great. Mateer shows zero signs. I saw 10 passes during the Ole Miss game that demonstrate this. But whatever makes you feel good

It makes me feel nothing.

I was simply asking if he was a coach or someone who evaluated NFL talent.

There were just as many or more folks who watched him play in HS and made similar boasts about how great his college career would be.

It’s not personal.

Page 1 2