Started By
Message
re: The importance of rooting for Alabama/SEC
Posted on 12/28/09 at 10:42 am to AlejandroInHouston
Posted on 12/28/09 at 10:42 am to AlejandroInHouston
LSU fans should know this after 2007
we owe all the respect we got (before we jumped 238 teams to move to #2) from UF in 2006
we owe all the respect we got (before we jumped 238 teams to move to #2) from UF in 2006
0
Posted on 12/28/09 at 10:43 am to ksayetiger
quote:
or maybe like texas?
UT is my #2 team
i'm rooting for Bama
Posted on 12/28/09 at 10:43 am to AlejandroInHouston
I don't give a crap either way. All this hand-wringing is ridiculous.
LSU needs to focus on LSU getting better. All this other crap doesn't matter.
LSU needs to focus on LSU getting better. All this other crap doesn't matter.
Posted on 12/28/09 at 10:44 am to danfraz
quote:
All this other crap doesn't matter.
But as SFP pointed out, it DOES matter. It's the reason we have a 2007 national championship. It's also the reason Auburn didn't even get to play for a national championship.
Until a playoff is instituted you HAVE to root for the SEC in major bowl games - especially the MNC game.
This post was edited on 12/28/09 at 10:46 am
Posted on 12/28/09 at 10:45 am to AlejandroInHouston
I hate the gumps.
I HATE the horns.
Roll Tide.
GEAUX SEC
I HATE the horns.
Roll Tide.
GEAUX SEC
Posted on 12/28/09 at 10:46 am to AlejandroInHouston
If UF is the reason we won it in '07, why did Auburn get in after we won it in '03?
Posted on 12/28/09 at 10:48 am to Choctaw
not enough SEC momentum had built up by then.
Posted on 12/28/09 at 10:48 am to AlejandroInHouston
The SEC refs didn't give a frick about LSU when Bama committed three face masks and they didn't call them. They didn't give a frick about LSU when they marked the ball back more than a yard from where forward progress ended on our first possession, which would have given us a first down as opposed to 4th down. They didn't give a frick when Peterson intercepted the ball. They didn't give a frick about LSU when the spotted the ball to 4th and inches for Bama instead of 4th and 1 after the penalty as it should have been.
Why do you think that in the future the SEC offices will give to LSU. They've been giving to Bama my whole life.
Why do you think that in the future the SEC offices will give to LSU. They've been giving to Bama my whole life.
Posted on 12/28/09 at 10:48 am to LSU GrandDad
I hate both, but I hate Texas more. Pluse gotta go for SEC.
Posted on 12/28/09 at 10:49 am to TIGRLEE
frick the SEC. Hook 'em Horns (I only cheer for one SEC team) and it's not the one playing in the title game.
Posted on 12/28/09 at 10:51 am to AlejandroInHouston
quote:
But as SFP pointed out
lord have mercy
quote:
It's the reason we have a 2007 national championship
no it's not. neither is 2003.
quote:
the reason Auburn didn't even get to play for a national championship.
is because USC and Okie were ranked 1/2 all year long. Had nothing to do with SEC or not SEC. If that's the case then they would have gotten in BECAUSE the SEC won in 03. Auburn was 8-5 the yr before and started the season ranked #17. That's why they didn't get in the NC game
quote:
you HAVE to root for the SEC in major bowl games
No I don't. This is the way it works. Win the games you play and you'll be in contention. If LSU (the team I root for) wins the games they play, I have a want to believe they will be in the NCG
Posted on 12/28/09 at 10:52 am to AlejandroInHouston
the sec rant will be a lot more entertaining if bama loses.
i dont want to watch saban win a national championship at bama. you can call it jealousy or whatever you want, but im not pulling for bama. the notion that it hurts the secs image is bullshite. the sec is and will continue to be the best conference in the country and everyone knows that.
i dont want to watch saban win a national championship at bama. you can call it jealousy or whatever you want, but im not pulling for bama. the notion that it hurts the secs image is bullshite. the sec is and will continue to be the best conference in the country and everyone knows that.
Posted on 12/28/09 at 10:55 am to ksayetiger
LSU's domination in national championship games speaks for itself...if Bama loses, they will be the 1st sec team ever to lose in the title game...not a big deal, what the sec has done in the title game is enough to cancel out a Bammer loss....i'd root for USC before I root for Bama, with or without Saban
hook em
hook em
This post was edited on 12/28/09 at 10:56 am
Posted on 12/28/09 at 10:58 am to Choctaw
quote:
why did Auburn get in after we won it in '03?
in the eyes of the media, USC won in 2003
Posted on 12/28/09 at 11:00 am to danfraz
quote:
no it's not.
we jump like 6 teams after the final week ONLY because of the respect LSU had based on UF slaughtering OSU in 2006
quote:
is because USC and Okie were ranked 1/2 all year long.
they wouldn't be ranked ahead to start the year nowadays
quote:
BECAUSE the SEC won in 03.
the AP had USC winning
the only reason teh coaches had LSU winning was due to contractual agreement. they wanted to pick USC
the landscape has changed
Posted on 12/28/09 at 11:01 am to danfraz
quote:
is because USC and Okie were ranked 1/2 all year long. Had nothing to do with SEC or not SEC. If that's the case then they would have gotten in BECAUSE the SEC won in 03. Auburn was 8-5 the yr before and started the season ranked #17. That's why they didn't get in the NC game
Plus, Aubie played a piss poor OOC schedule (ULM, Citadel, LA Tech) and OU and USC at least played some other teams in BCS conferences that year.
Posted on 12/28/09 at 11:03 am to AlejandroInHouston
quote:
But as SFP pointed out, it DOES matter. It's the reason we have a 2007 national championship. It's also the reason Auburn didn't even get to play for a national championship.
bullshite...
Posted on 12/28/09 at 11:05 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
we jump like 6 teams after the final week ONLY because of the respect LSU had based on UF slaughtering OSU in 2006
b.s.- Overall record vs Top 25 teams in 07 did that. If it's all based on "respect" of the SEC, where was UGA, which the media constantly touted as the hottest team. Where was their SEC respect for them? LSU got in the 07 game based on the teams they beat.
quote:
they wouldn't be ranked ahead to start the year nowadays
so your saying a 8-5 SEC would be ranked higher than Okie and USC teams of 2004? Jeebus Posted on 12/28/09 at 11:08 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
we jump like 6 teams after the final week ONLY because of the respect LSU had based on UF slaughtering OSU in 2006
No...we jumped a few of those teams because we had one more win (SECCG)
We jumped UGA because of the SECCG
We jumped VT because we crushed them earlier in the year.
Posted on 12/28/09 at 11:09 am to danfraz
quote:
Overall record vs Top 25 teams in 07 did that.
when the frick has a team ever jumped 3-4 other teams with similar records (who did notlose) in teh final week?
has this EVER happened before?
in 2004 or 2005 LSU would not have been ranked ahead of OU or USC in a similar situation
quote:
where was UGA, which the media constantly touted as the hottest team.
we were the preseason pimp daddies. that matters to sports writers with over-inflated opinions of themselves
quote:
so your saying a 8-5 SEC would be ranked higher than Okie and USC teams of 2004?
reading comprehension is not your strong suit
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News