Started By
Message
The ACC should be banned from the playoff
Posted on 11/30/19 at 6:47 am
Posted on 11/30/19 at 6:47 am
Until they can prove themselves to be better than the AAC.
5
Posted on 11/30/19 at 7:07 am to ghusbhus
You make an excellent point. AAC>ACC.
Posted on 11/30/19 at 7:17 am to ghusbhus
Yeah. ACC championship has Clem’s Son vs unranked UVA. Haha
Posted on 11/30/19 at 7:26 am to AvidLSUfan
Every time I look up somebody is complaining about the ACC. Remember we have won 3 of the last 6 national championships and about to be 4 out of the last 7 championships. We have a winning record against the Sec since the College Football Playoffs begin also. Beat us on the field then talk. I never seen a group of fans cry so much. Grow some balls and win it on the field then talk.
Posted on 11/30/19 at 7:29 am to Rawanduncut
Easier to win when you can spend the full year prepping for playoff opponents.
This post was edited on 11/30/19 at 7:29 am
Posted on 11/30/19 at 7:31 am to Fats
What does UGA know about making the playoffs and/or winning championships?
Posted on 11/30/19 at 7:36 am to Fats
That's a copout. That's just an excuse. Sec fans like to say irons sharpen iron and you will be more battle tested so you expect to win when you play other conferences and the other teams are not tested. Then win you lose you find another excuse. Sometimes it is plain and simple you are not the best team. Just because you play in the Sec don't make you the best team Every year. Other people play football too.
Posted on 11/30/19 at 7:38 am to ghusbhus
Two SEC teams with a combined 7-9 conference record are the toughest games on Clemson’s schedule
Posted on 11/30/19 at 7:44 am to Glorious
It don't matter. If you are the best then beat them. Until then you are just whining and crying.
Posted on 11/30/19 at 7:46 am to ghusbhus
Clemson is going to wind up drubbing everyone now.
Posted on 11/30/19 at 7:51 am to ghusbhus
quote:
Until they can prove themselves to be better than the AAC.
When they start giving out National Titles for Conferences then maybe you could make a case but the Playoffs are still about individual teams. Also there is this pesky problem with the ACC's best team winning 2 of the last 4 nationals titles against the SEC's best team...
If you want to stop the ACC then do it the old fashioned way and beat Clemson on the field rather than braying like a donkey wanting some type of rule to omit a team...You must be a Democrat.
Posted on 11/30/19 at 8:16 am to Rawanduncut
quote:
Every time I look up somebody is complaining about the ACC. Remember we have won 3 of the last 6 national championships and about to be 4 out of the last 7 championships.
I doubt Clemson wins it this year. That said, name one viable team outside of Clemson. When you play your championship game you will have gone an entire season without playing an single ranked team. (At the end of the season) Think about that. I'm not sure if any other conference champion in the history of rankings could make that claim.
ETA
The AAC has more ranked teams.
This post was edited on 11/30/19 at 8:18 am
Posted on 11/30/19 at 8:20 am to DawgsLife
quote:
I doubt Clemson wins it this year. That said, name one viable team outside of Clemson. When you play your championship game you will have gone an entire season without beating an single ranked team. Think about that. I'm not sure if any other conference champion in the history of rankings could make that claim.
When idiots like you finally get off the conference high-horse and come to the realization that the BCS era is over where conference favoritism was the key to access then team like UGA will quit choking when it matters...Sit back and Clemson will show you how to properly beat down South Carolina...
Posted on 11/30/19 at 8:21 am to CU_Tigers4life
quote:
When they start giving out National Titles for Conferences then maybe you could make a case but the Playoffs are still about individual teams.
Hard to blame you for wanting to distance yourself from that conference.
quote:Wait. Didn't the SEC's top team win the last 2 out of 4? I'm pretty sure thta happened, too. Then let's add thta SEC teams have won 9 of the last 13 NC's. So, when the ACC manages to match that you can join the big boy table.
Also there is this pesky problem with the ACC's best team winning 2 of the last 4 nationals titles against the SEC's best team...
Until then....? Not so much.
Posted on 11/30/19 at 8:24 am to CU_Tigers4life
quote:
When idiots like you finally get off the conference high-horse and come to the realization that the BCS era is over where conference favoritism was the key to access then team like UGA will quit choking when it matters...Sit back and Clemson will show you how to properly beat down South Carolina..
You just wait till Clemson has to play a top tier SEC team in the playoffs. Then it’ll be apparent that Clemson is just a pretender....
Wait, never mind.
Posted on 11/30/19 at 8:25 am to CU_Tigers4life
quote:
When idiots like you finally get off the conference high-horse and come to the realization that the BCS era is over where conference favoritism was the key to access then team like UGA will quit choking when it matters...Sit back and Clemson will show you how to properly beat down South Carolina..
Georgia choking?
They don't call it Clemsoning for nothing. And, don't forget the team we "choked" against was another SEC team. We seem to beat ACC teams with regularity.
Conference favoritism? I could buy that if the SEC had not won 7 straight NCs and did it with 4 different teams.
Obviously the only way the SEC won 7 straight was because of conference favoritism. I mean, any conference could have done that, right?
Posted on 11/30/19 at 8:26 am to Rules
quote:
You just wait till Clemson has to play a top tier SEC team in the playoffs. Then it’ll be apparent that Clemson is just a pretender....
Wait, never mind.
Riding Clemson's coat tailes are we, Rules? The ACC has 0 ranked teams outside of Clemson. Zero. Nada. And your champions will have played zero ranked teams. Zero.
Posted on 11/30/19 at 8:28 am to DawgsLife
quote:
Wait. Didn't the SEC's top team win the last 2 out of 4? I'm pretty sure thta happened, too. Then let's add thta SEC teams have won 9 of the last 13 NC's. So, when the ACC manages to match that you can join the big boy table.
Until then....? Not so much.
Okay slick...you are shitting on yourself. If you want to include the BCS ERA that's fine..You want to slant the numbers to satisfy your bullshite fine..
Okay, the ACC has won 3 or the last 6 titles..so what?
He's one unequivocal truth Mr. UGA fan...How many Natty's has the ACC won since UGA won their last in 1980?..Clemson is good for 3...You can play the silly numbers game all you want...UGA is still a Brides Maid and a Choke artist.
BTW..Even GT has a Natty since UGa last won one...
This post was edited on 11/30/19 at 8:33 am
Posted on 11/30/19 at 8:33 am to CU_Tigers4life
quote:
Okay slick...you are shitting on yourself. If you want to include the BCS ERA that's fine..You want to slant the numbers to satisfy your bull shite fine..
Dude. What? You want to cut out a portion of history just to make you look better?
quote:Congrats? When you get to 7 straight or 9 out of 13 let us know, will you...slick?
Okay, the ACC has won 3 or the last 6 titles..so what?
quote:A whole conference against one team? Nice. That'll show us! Your argument is the ACC has won more NC than Georgia has!
He's one unequivocal truth Mr. UGA fan...How many Natty's has the ACC won since UGA won their last in 1980?..
You can't make this up!
Dude. nobody is arguing that Clemson is not good. We are saying the ACC is not good. Do you really want to argue that point? Seriously?
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News