Started By
Message
re: Targeting?
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:08 pm to MikkUGA
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:08 pm to MikkUGA
quote:
was so fricking wrong then why did the entire group of officials look at the replay and say it was not targeting?
Refs messed up. I hope the ASU coach explains what he was told.
quote:
Because you think every helmet to helmet contact should be called. I
No. I do not think that.
0
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:10 pm to MikkUGA
quote:
What part of lowering and forcible contact did you miss in those two rules?
I posted the rule. Do you see the word “lowering”? No. That’s not the rule.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:16 pm to djsdawg
How the frick are you going to launch into someone and hit them with the crown of your helmet without lowering your head? I can literally point out helmet to helmet incidental contact on defenseless players in nearly every play.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:18 pm to djsdawg
Here i will explain it to you really simple so you can understand. You have to lower your head to make forcible contact with the crown of your helmet.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:21 pm to MikkUGA
quote:
You have to lower your head to make forcible contact with the crown of your helmet.
You are wrong. Here is the rule:
Targeting Rule 9-1-4: No player shall target and make forcible contact to the head or neck area of a defenseless opponent with the helmet, forearm, hand, fist, elbow or shoulder.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:21 pm to MikkUGA
No, on a defenseless player there is no lowering or crown of the helmet requirement.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:22 pm to MikkUGA
quote:
How the frick are you going to launch into someone and hit them with the crown of your helmet without lowering your head?
Huh?
He didn’t hit him with his crown.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:24 pm to MikkUGA
quote:
can literally point out helmet to helmet incidental contact on defenseless players in nearly every play.
I bet you can’t. Even if you could, it’s only a foul if it’s forcible contact.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:50 pm to OldCat55
quote:
No, on a defenseless player there is no lowering or crown of the helmet requirement.
I have tried to tell him.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 5:30 pm to djsdawg
It still has to be forcible contact. It was incidental contact. Damn, you all are still on here crying about that? The targeting bs is bad enough to have to deal with , without listening to grown men cry about every little hit being called for targeting. It's people like you all that are destroying this sport.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 6:45 pm to MikkUGA
quote:
still has to be forcible contact. It was incidental contact.
It was a very hard hit as evidenced by how his body reacted to the hit.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 6:46 pm to djsdawg
You reek of fear.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 6:48 pm to bigbopper
Rules are rules.
I would be more in fear if Texas if we didn’t beat Texas twice.
I would be more in fear if Texas if we didn’t beat Texas twice.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 6:48 pm to bigbopper
Georgia will finally get their 3-peat on texASS arse
Posted on 1/2/25 at 6:32 am to MeatRocket879
Posted on 1/2/25 at 6:36 am to Wishbone85
Parody account I believe
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News