Started By
Message
re: So is it pretty much established that Arky and Auburn aren't "elite programs"
Posted on 9/15/12 at 6:05 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Posted on 9/15/12 at 6:05 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Don't get me wrong, I despise auburn...but drac, you're an idiot. Lsu is Johnny come lately. Historically speaking AU is = Lsu
Posted on 9/15/12 at 6:07 pm to Riseupfromtherubble
quote:
Historically speaking AU is = Lsu
In what way? As I said before we have them beat on NCs, SEC titles, wins, top tens, top 25's, bowls, major bowls and series record.
Where exactly are they our equal?
This post was edited on 9/15/12 at 6:08 pm
Posted on 9/15/12 at 6:14 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
bowls
Your bowl record is almost .500. Not exactly something to crow about.
Posted on 9/15/12 at 6:20 pm to DeuceisLoose
Going to a bowl and losing is better than not being good enough to make a bowl game in the first place.
Posted on 9/15/12 at 6:21 pm to DeuceisLoose
You AU guys are seriously ill if you think people regard Auburn as being an elite program. They have never (except for the one Cam year) been thought of as anything more than a Clemson/West Virginia-type program. Very good at times . . . but never elite.
You have to string together championships (heck, great teams) for that. LSU and Bama have.
You have to string together championships (heck, great teams) for that. LSU and Bama have.
Posted on 9/15/12 at 6:24 pm to Bham4Tide
quote:
Going to a bowl and losing is better than not being good enough to make a bowl game in the first place.
Sure. But when you've won 22 out of your 43 bowl games in history, it takes some of that luster off.
Posted on 9/15/12 at 6:25 pm to Draconian Sanctions
I'm too drunk to look all that shite up, but I bet eery category you brought up is very very close
Posted on 9/15/12 at 6:29 pm to Riseupfromtherubble
Auburn has won 15 less games them historically. Bowl victories are the same.
Posted on 9/15/12 at 6:30 pm to Riseupfromtherubble
quote:
I'm too drunk to look all that shite up, but I bet eery category you brought up is very very close
We don't destroy them or anything but it's not as close as you would think. If I remember correctly we lead them in top ten finishes 25-17.
This post was edited on 9/15/12 at 6:31 pm
Posted on 9/15/12 at 6:31 pm to DeuceisLoose
quote:
Bowl victories are the same.
But we have 8 or 9 more appearances. Plus we've played in more big 4 bowls thus better competition.
Posted on 9/15/12 at 6:32 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Nb4 Auburn is blah blah vs top 30 teams random stat
Posted on 9/15/12 at 6:34 pm to hg
I'm not saying Auburn is a bad program or anything, just saying that LSU is better any way you slice it and not equal as riseupfromtherubble tries to claim.
if we were truly equal they would have the lead in some of these stats.
if we were truly equal they would have the lead in some of these stats.
Popular
Back to top


1







