Started By
Message
re: So how many quarterbacks do we have?
Posted on 2/14/11 at 10:24 pm to fillmoregandt
Posted on 2/14/11 at 10:24 pm to fillmoregandt
Mackey, Stoudt and Stanley are the only ones in the battle to start. I imagine Mackey is the leader but it depends on what kind of offense we decide to run. If Nutt wants to stay with the same offense as last year Mackey will start for sure. If he wants to go to more of a pro style of passing game then Stoudt and Stanley have the edge. It all depends on which QB works the best with which offense in the spring.
We will have a good running game with Markuson + whole 2 deep back on the offense line with Jeff Scott and Brandon Bolden. It might come down to which QB makes the least mistakes in the passing game. If that is the case then Stanley probably gets the starting nod. This will be one of the most important springs for us on both sides of the ball in a long time.
CB, LB, DT and weather Shack plays mainly DE or LB need to all be answered before 2 a days. We shall see if that is the case.
We will have a good running game with Markuson + whole 2 deep back on the offense line with Jeff Scott and Brandon Bolden. It might come down to which QB makes the least mistakes in the passing game. If that is the case then Stanley probably gets the starting nod. This will be one of the most important springs for us on both sides of the ball in a long time.
CB, LB, DT and weather Shack plays mainly DE or LB need to all be answered before 2 a days. We shall see if that is the case.
2
Posted on 2/14/11 at 11:52 pm to HottyToddy7
quote:
CB, LB, DT and weather Shack plays mainly DE or LB need to all be answered before 2 a days. We shall see if that is the case.
If DT isnt put at SLB full time. Then Nix deserves to be fired IMO
Posted on 2/14/11 at 11:54 pm to HottyToddy7
quote:
We will have a good running game with Markuson + whole 2 deep back on the offense line with Jeff Scott and Brandon Bolden. It might come down to which QB makes the least mistakes in the passing game. If that is the case then Stanley probably gets the starting nod. This will be one of the most important springs for us on both sides of the ball in a long time.
I dont see Stanley beating out Mackey unless he still cant call the plays in the huddle
Posted on 2/14/11 at 11:55 pm to mmjones87
quote:
If DT isnt put at SLB full time. Then Nix deserves to be fired IMO
IMO if C. Jackson and Marry are as advertised then the need is more at DE opposite Lockett. We need all the help we can get on the D-line with the lack of experience at DT.
quote:
I dont see Stanley beating out Mackey unless he still cant call the plays in the huddle
I agree but if our running game is good and Mackey has the Sneed/Favre complex of trying to force throws and Stanley is more protective of the ball I would have no problem with Stanley playing. This is all based on the fact we have no idea what Mackey is going to do in game type situations.
This post was edited on 2/14/11 at 11:57 pm
Posted on 2/14/11 at 11:57 pm to HottyToddy7
quote:
C. Jackson
How is he still on the team?
quote:
the need is more at DE opposite Lockett
This will cost DT a shot at playing on Sundays, and isnt needed especially if Clos and Jones are ready. Dorsey can sit down, imo.
quote:
We need all the help we can get on the D-line with the lack of experience at DT.
I know we need help, but isnt that why we signed 2 juco DTs?
quote:
This is all based on the fact we have no idea what Mackey is going to do in game type situations.
When in doubt tuck it and run
This post was edited on 2/14/11 at 11:59 pm
Posted on 2/15/11 at 12:00 am to sorantable
Whats pathetic is that all of them suck.
Posted on 2/15/11 at 12:01 am to mmjones87
quote:
How is he still on the team?
Nutt gave him a list of things to do to get back on the team and last I heard he was all squared away with Nutt for spring practice.
quote:
This will cost DT a shot at playing on Sundays
IMO he is a 3 -4 OLB/DE anyway. It won't hurt his stock that much.
quote:
I know we need help, but isnt that why we signed 2 juco DTs?
Well I would feel much better with 2 all conference ends out there to be honest.
Posted on 2/15/11 at 12:05 am to HottyToddy7
quote:
Nutt gave him a list of things to do to get back on the team and last I heard he was all squared away with Nutt for spring practice.
I dont know what to make of that. I dont wanna recruit kids from bible camp not named Tebow, but we have to draw the line somewhere
quote:
IMO he is a 3 -4 OLB/DE anyway. It won't hurt his stock that much.
Putting him at SLB is the best way to use him imo. Nix's defense isnt exactly rocket science and he is our best LB
quote:
Well I would feel much better with 2 all conference ends out there to be honest.
Didnt Lockett play in a All Star game thus forfeiting his eligibility?
This post was edited on 2/15/11 at 12:06 am
Posted on 2/15/11 at 12:14 am to mmjones87
quote:
Didnt Lockett play in a All Star game thus forfeiting his eligibility?
Not that I am aware of. I follow him on twitter and he is still rehabbing and waiting on his word from the NCAA. He should get his 5th year. The line is 4 games and he got hurt in the 4th game last year and didn't play against JSU because of an injury.
This post was edited on 2/15/11 at 12:15 am
Posted on 2/15/11 at 1:15 am to mmjones87
What I don't like is that almost 20% of our current roster is made up of QB's...
Posted on 2/15/11 at 1:45 am to sorantable
The upcoming year for Ole Miss will be interesting.
Hootie does have a habit of overcompensating in certain positions when recruiting, but what gets my attention is the appearance of putting more emphasis on a passing game. Of course, we have seen that when he was at Arkansas too. This next year might actually turn out better for Ole Miss than I had initially expected...but who can confidently say what will happen? The coaching changes could make a big difference but who knows?
Hootie does have a habit of overcompensating in certain positions when recruiting, but what gets my attention is the appearance of putting more emphasis on a passing game. Of course, we have seen that when he was at Arkansas too. This next year might actually turn out better for Ole Miss than I had initially expected...but who can confidently say what will happen? The coaching changes could make a big difference but who knows?
This post was edited on 2/15/11 at 3:37 am
Posted on 2/15/11 at 2:05 am to ztucke2
quote:
I'm always surprised to see OM win 7-8 games any year
FIFY
Posted on 2/15/11 at 7:20 am to HottyToddy7
quote:
Not that I am aware of. I follow him on twitter and he is still rehabbing and waiting on his word from the NCAA. He should get his 5th year. The line is 4 games and he got hurt in the 4th game last year and didn't play against JSU because of an injury.
I thought the deal was that he had already redshirted once, and now he is applying for a 6th year of eligibility. I thought I read that he was invited to the NFL combine, so Im not sure if he is coming back considering the need for sports for your new recruits due to Nutt oversigning.
Posted on 2/15/11 at 7:58 am to sorantable
quote:
What I don't like is that almost 20% of our current roster is made up of QB's...
What?
You're allowed to have 85 guys on scholarship (I have no idea what the limit for walk-on players is, and if you're counting the walk-ons in this calculation then your entire premise is flawed anyway). Out of that 85, we have four quarterbacks on scholarship. 4/85 = 4.7%
4.7% < 20%
Posted on 2/15/11 at 8:00 am to Al Bundy Bulldog
quote:
I thought I read that he was invited to the NFL combine, so Im not sure if he is coming back considering the need for sports for your new recruits due to Nutt oversigning.
He was invited, but that doesn't mean anything.
And Nutt didn't oversign this year. The SEC imposed limit (or the "Nutt Rule," as you may know it) is 28. Ole Miss signed 27.
27 < 28
There are a lot of people who can't count or do rudimentary mathematics on the Rant this morning. I'll assume you're all in need of that second cup of coffee.
Posted on 2/15/11 at 8:21 am to Porky
WOW I cant believe he has that many on campus, I still remember the year he pulled the QB off of the intermural field and played him in a game. GOOD LUCK OM 
Posted on 2/15/11 at 8:24 am to sorantable
quote:
Barry Brunetti- we'll see-scholly
Parks Frazier- walkon-never heard of him
Chris Garrett- walkon
Evan Ingram -walk-on
Randall Mackey- scholly
Robert Ratliff- walkon -never heard of him.
Nathan Stanley- chump
Zach Stoudt- we'll see -scholly
Clayton Moore- inked with akron
This post was edited on 2/15/11 at 8:25 am
Posted on 2/15/11 at 9:23 am to Music City Hog
So what we haven't had a qb in 3 years. 
Posted on 2/15/11 at 9:31 am to RebFeBrees
quote:
Nathan Stanley- chump
Why all the hate for Stanley? What has he done wrong at Ole Miss? I mean the guy was days away from being your #1 QB after they didnt clear Masoli at first. Its amazing how you guys think that he is a chump and has no chance of starting next year.
Posted on 2/15/11 at 9:31 am to cajunjj
Dont forget Witt Haggard . walk on quaterback from lamar school in meridian
Page 2 of 3
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News