Started By
Message
0
Posted on 8/24/24 at 1:23 pm to Smokeyone
quote:
reckless driving is a game 2nd offense is 6 games.
So reckless driving is a game and felony assault is two games?
Posted on 8/24/24 at 2:04 pm to Smokeyone
quote:
Street racing 1st offense is a game. After the UGA player street racing killed 2 it should be reckless driving is a game 2nd offense is 6 games. DUI 3 games 2nd is gone Speeding 1 st offense 1/2 a game 2nd offense 2 games Speeding with a wreck 2 games 2nd 6 games A reasonable response after 2 deaths in the program.
No one cares what some loser on a coach claims he would do. Not a single successful coach would resort to any of your nonsense.
Posted on 8/24/24 at 2:35 pm to DrewDawg13
quote:
Stop avoiding the question lil smokey, why the obsession with UGA?
Having to explain simple concepts over and over to y’all because y’all are too simplistic to see beyond the “my team” nonsense isn’t an obsession with UGA.
As for the “go into Vols threads and talk about assaults”, it would discussion on the past with nothing approaching the issues at UGA. Because at most schools the petty nonsense isn’t allowed to get to the point of killing people and suing newspapers to cover up stuff.
Posted on 8/24/24 at 2:42 pm to DrewDawg13
quote:
Now answer my question, don't run away lil Smokey
He is obsessed because all of the smart kids went to uga and he had to go to a small middle ga college.
He runs from threads because he thinks it’s easier to be a coward than a man. I think he knows what happens in garbage time.
Posted on 8/24/24 at 2:48 pm to Smokeyone
Maybe you missed this question?
So reckless driving is a game and felony assault is two games?
That is what you are advocating?
So reckless driving is a game and felony assault is two games?
That is what you are advocating?
Posted on 8/24/24 at 3:07 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
So reckless driving is a game and felony assault is two games?
You know the circumstances for the “assault” don’t be stupid. And reckless drive AFTER THE STREET RACING CULTURE AT UGA KILLED A PLAYER AND A MEMBER OF THE AD STAFF. Why is that so hard of a concept for you to grasp. The steps taken AFTER THE STREET RACING CULTURE KILLED 2, are different than before you had a problem.
Posted on 8/24/24 at 3:20 pm to Smokeyone
quote:
Having to explain simple concepts over and over to y’all because y’all are too simplistic to see beyond the “my team” nonsense isn’t an obsession with UGA.
As for the “go into Vols threads and talk about assaults”, it would discussion on the past with nothing approaching the issues at UGA. Because at most schools the petty nonsense isn’t allowed to get to the point of killing people and suing newspapers to cover up stuff.
Still didn't answer the question, typical.
Posted on 8/24/24 at 3:29 pm to DrewDawg13
quote:
Still didn't answer the question, typical.
Y’all might as well be one poster, what question did you ask that you feel hasn’t been addressed.
Posted on 8/24/24 at 3:31 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Yes, and then I saw your homer spin of the story, so I had to correct you. Now run away coward.
The only spin was you leaving out the the dude breaking and entering was drunk and belligerent.
Posted on 8/24/24 at 3:46 pm to Smokeyone
quote:
The only spin was you leaving out the the dude breaking and entering was drunk and belligerent.
Yes, that’s your spin, not what really happened. Only a homer vol would spin it that way.
There is an obvious reason he wasn’t charged with breaking and entering, but your small middle Georgia college education isn’t helping you see it.
Posted on 8/24/24 at 4:28 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Yes, that’s your spin, not what really happened
Read the testimony kid. Even the “victim” stated he was drunk and belligerent.
Posted on 8/24/24 at 4:33 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
Well, You did say that a two game suspension was being proactive and about the right punishment while the law said a 3-15 year sentence was appropriate.
Do you believe he got a 3-15 year sentence? For 1 punch.
quote:
But he didn't escalate it
Refusing to leave, threatening violence when he was forced to leave? Is escalate too big of a word and you don’t understand what it means? I know the GA public education is a failure but this one shouldn’t be that hard.
Your nonsense has already been addressed.
Posted on 8/24/24 at 4:48 pm to Smokeyone
quote:
Read the testimony kid. Even the “victim” stated he was drunk and belligerent.
Irrelevant. We are talking about your “he broke into a locked apartment, so it was okay to punch him a few times” spin. You are proven wrong because he wasn’t charged with breaking and entering. Why? Thats not what happened.
This post was edited on 8/24/24 at 4:49 pm
Posted on 8/24/24 at 4:53 pm to djsdawg
Being drunk and belligerent didn’t play a role in the response? God you are dense.
Posted on 8/24/24 at 5:00 pm to Smokeyone
quote:
Being drunk and belligerent didn’t play a role in the response? God you are dense.
Why is reading so hard for you? We are talking about you spinning opening an unlocked door into BREAKING into a locked apartment. Pure nonsense on your part.
Posted on 8/24/24 at 5:01 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
Dude. Didn't LSU have a RB that was arrested for statutory rape while in high school, have two students accuse him of rape while at LSU, then was named for sexual harassment of a 74 year old woman?
That’s a week at UGA
Posted on 8/24/24 at 5:05 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Why is reading so hard for you? We are talking about you spinning opening an unlocked door into BREAKING into a locked apartment. Pure nonsense on your part.
Read the report. Maybe if you had attended college you would understand what it means to have to remove a belligerent drunk from your dorm/apartment.
Posted on 8/24/24 at 5:11 pm to Smokeyone
quote:
Read the report. Maybe if you had attended college you would understand what it means to have to remove a belligerent drunk from your dorm/apartment.
The report says he “opened the unlocked door and started to walk in”. You said he “broke in”. You were wrong.
Posted on 8/24/24 at 6:51 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Yes, it is still considered breaking and entering if the door is unlocked. The legal definition of breaking and entering does not require physical force to be used to gain entry. Simply entering a property without the owner's permission, even if the door is unlocked, meets the criteria for the crime of breaking and entering. The lack of forced entry does not make it any less unlawful to enter a property you do not have permission to access.
Here you go DJ. I know you like to just copy and paste answers. Hopefully this puts it a format you can grasp.
Page 10 of 20
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News