Started By
Message

re: Shane Beamer is kind of a tool and completely in the wrong in his spat with Bert

Posted on 1/2/25 at 10:07 am to
Posted by Buryl
Member since Sep 2016
979 posts
Posted on 1/2/25 at 10:07 am to
quote:

Notice nobody got hurt. In fact, the whole "Player safety" conversation that Bert raised is a red herring. Because when a player makes the "T-bar" signal, what do the opposing players do? Slow down. The only thing that was endangered of being hurt on that play was Bielema's ego.


Nobody got hurt THIS TIME. The issue is that, moving forward, players won’t trust the t-bar signal. So now you’ll have players blowing each other up full speed on fair catches.
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
28914 posts
Posted on 1/2/25 at 10:08 am to
quote:

The issue is that, moving forward, players won’t trust the t-bar signal.


That's why there's the fair catch signal.
Posted by Jdillard343434
Greenville sc
Member since Dec 2020
1400 posts
Posted on 1/2/25 at 10:10 am to
I agree he does but hey he fits in with usuk
Posted by Buryl
Member since Sep 2016
979 posts
Posted on 1/2/25 at 10:10 am to
quote:

That's why there's the fair catch signal.


Which isn’t always visible to every player… this isn’t difficult. I don’t understand why yall are going so hard on this one. It was a shitty play. Not illegal, but wouldn’t be surprised if we see a rule change.
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
28914 posts
Posted on 1/2/25 at 10:13 am to
quote:

Which isn’t always visible to every player


So they can see a T bar signal but can't see the fair catch signal?
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
28914 posts
Posted on 1/2/25 at 10:14 am to
quote:

I don’t understand why yall are going so hard on this one.


Because of the ethics of it.

Optically, did Beamer make an @$$ of himself? Yes. Was it a bad look? Yes. Was he wrong (like fat bert said)? No.
Posted by Jdillard343434
Greenville sc
Member since Dec 2020
1400 posts
Posted on 1/2/25 at 10:16 am to
So you cherry picked someone's opinions who l8ned up with yours that's lame as hell
Posted by Nasty_Canasta
Your Mom’s house
Member since Dec 2024
540 posts
Posted on 1/2/25 at 10:17 am to
Big Bert won with deception. Hard to imagine but the guy is a decent ball coach. Surprised a lot of people in the ILLini community. Most had this one chalked up as a big loss
Posted by NickPapageorgio
Yuma, AZ
Member since Oct 2014
849 posts
Posted on 1/2/25 at 10:19 am to
quote:

Because of the ethics of it.

Optically, did Beamer make an @$$ of himself? Yes. Was it a bad look? Yes. Was he wrong (like fat bert said)? No.


Well, you've confused two things. Legality and Ethics. Top search result....

***********************************************

An unethical deed may be against morality but not against the law. An illegal deed is always unethical while an unethical action may or may not be illegal.

**********************************************

Some more.....

Illegal and unethical are two distinct concepts, although they can sometimes overlap. Illegal refers to actions that are prohibited by law and can result in legal consequences if committed. These actions are deemed unlawful and are typically defined and enforced by the government or legal system. On the other hand, unethical actions are those that are morally wrong or go against accepted principles of conduct.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I hope this helps you understand the two concepts. You can be acting with low morals and bad ethics while still doing nothing illegal.

Posted by Jdillard343434
Greenville sc
Member since Dec 2020
1400 posts
Posted on 1/2/25 at 10:21 am to
It wasn't illegal was he wrong yes he was wrong
Posted by Buryl
Member since Sep 2016
979 posts
Posted on 1/2/25 at 10:27 am to
quote:

So they can see a T bar signal but can't see the fair catch signal?


It’s likely more visible - and increases the probability that the opposing players see at least one of the signals.
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
28914 posts
Posted on 1/2/25 at 10:49 am to
quote:

may be against morality


Ok then. Who gets to say what's moral or ethical and what isn't? Since everyone has their own moral code, doesn't that default us back to what's LEGAL and what isn't? Isn't that why we have rules to begin with?

And FWIW, I knew this play was coming before they even kicked off Tuesday. Why? Because they ran basically this same play vs Clemson and Dabo didn't say 1 word about it.
This post was edited on 1/2/25 at 10:54 am
Posted by NickPapageorgio
Yuma, AZ
Member since Oct 2014
849 posts
Posted on 1/2/25 at 10:54 am to
It's subjective.

For instance, to an atheist there may be nothing that is immoral or unethical.

Yet, to a thinking adult.....lying or going against accepted norms like using a signal common between coaches that indicates an agreement to limit injuries and then injuring a player....would be considered unethical and a trashy, no class move.

Posted by Bengalbio
Tampa, FL
Member since Feb 2017
1800 posts
Posted on 1/2/25 at 10:59 am to
quote:

Nobody got hurt THIS TIME. The issue is that, moving forward, players won’t trust the t-bar signal.


This.

Bigger question is why Beamer went nuts after getting called out on designed play using a signal that communicates you are giving up on the play.
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
28914 posts
Posted on 1/2/25 at 10:59 am to
quote:

It's subjective.


Ahh. So, Beamer thought it was an ethical. Bert did not. So therefore, what do we have to fall back on. The rulebook.

Just because Bert didn't like it, didn't mean it was wrong. He just got his feelings hurt.
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
28914 posts
Posted on 1/2/25 at 11:01 am to
quote:

using a signal that communicates you are giving up on the play.


That would be the fair catch signal, not the "T-bar" signal (which has no official status).
Posted by NickPapageorgio
Yuma, AZ
Member since Oct 2014
849 posts
Posted on 1/2/25 at 11:06 am to
quote:

He just got his feelings hurt.


Actually, a player got hurt.

And you still haven't grasp the two distinct concepts.
Posted by ummagumma
Member since Aug 2012
268 posts
Posted on 1/2/25 at 11:08 am to
If Beamer is perfectly okay directing his players to fake an unofficial player safety signal for the sole purpose to deceive an opponent, he should man up and accept being called out on it. All he had to do was just smile and shrug his shoulders. Instead he blew a freaking fuse like a psycho. He’s an embarrassment to himself and his program.
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
28914 posts
Posted on 1/2/25 at 11:08 am to
quote:

Actually, a player got hurt.


Not on the kickoff. He got hurt later in the game when he was trucked by Sellers.

Here's the kickoff. Notice nobody got hurt. Kinda changes Bert's narrative doesn't it?

This post was edited on 1/2/25 at 11:09 am
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
28914 posts
Posted on 1/2/25 at 11:10 am to
quote:

unofficial player safety signal


Key word highlighted.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter