Started By
Message
re: SEC Teams Need to Stop Scheduling West Virginia
Posted on 9/26/11 at 10:44 am to SpicyStacy
Posted on 9/26/11 at 10:44 am to SpicyStacy
Mo Jeaux, you think playing internet truth police makes you some sort of genius? So if something is on the internt = false? or just, if something is one the internt = not true? Or maybe we should separate the fecal matter from your brain so you can figure out how to determine if a story is true or false for yourself. For me, it was easy. I read facebook posts from his wife and family. I saw a picture of his face that was posted this morning before being removed. I've read the WVU incident report that something occured on campus and they're actively investigating. You on the other hand employ the tongue in cheek "if it's on the internet it must be true" method. That's some stephen hawking genius level shite right there buddy. Good job.
If you've ever wondered why you're continually arse raped in life, I'll help you out. You're an a-hole who is also stupid. That's hard to overcome.
If you've ever wondered why you're continually arse raped in life, I'll help you out. You're an a-hole who is also stupid. That's hard to overcome.
1
Posted on 9/26/11 at 1:18 pm to Political Hack
Morgantown, WVU Police Investigating Game Day Theft, Random Assault
quote:
Officials said one person was seriously injured and are encouraging anyone who may have been in that area at the time to call the University Police or the Morgantown Police. The Morgantown Police are leading the investigation and the University Police are assisting.
Posted on 9/26/11 at 3:40 pm to CrimsonTideMD
CrimsonTideMD,
I suggest you Wiki a picture of "gluteus maximus" and pay close attention to its close prox to the anus. One big pucker of the lips and you can kiss my arse you condescending prick.
ETA: There was nothing in my post challenging your medical expertise. Get over yourself.
I suggest you Wiki a picture of "gluteus maximus" and pay close attention to its close prox to the anus. One big pucker of the lips and you can kiss my arse you condescending prick.
ETA: There was nothing in my post challenging your medical expertise. Get over yourself.
This post was edited on 9/26/11 at 3:54 pm
Posted on 9/26/11 at 6:16 pm to McChowder
Me: "One good haymaker breaks all of them (frontal and nasal bones). It can look like nothing more than a shiner and a busted nose."
+
You: "Naso-orbital fractures are not <normally> caused by fists"
= you challenging medical expertise
All of which was even funnier as I noticed your signature line for the first time.
+
You: "Naso-orbital fractures are not <normally> caused by fists"
= you challenging medical expertise
All of which was even funnier as I noticed your signature line for the first time.
Posted on 9/26/11 at 7:20 pm to CrimsonTideMD
quote:
Naso-orbital fractures are not <normally> caused by fists
Maybe I should have done this insted.......
****-------->>>>NORMALLY<<<<-----------****
I never claimed it was impossible (see above). My post doesnt even disagree with your assertion as that being a "possibility". Only that one is more likely than the other.
Like I said before, get over yourself and brush up on that reading comp.
Posted on 9/26/11 at 7:31 pm to McChowder
It's not more likely, DQMW
Posted on 9/26/11 at 7:58 pm to CrimsonTideMD
It is more likely. The honeycomb structure of the orbital floor is more suseptable to presure from a direct hit. The orbital rim is much harder to fracture from a strike to the nose. Maybe I should just add an MD by my username on a freak'n message board so I can have your level of cyber cred. 
Posted on 9/27/11 at 7:28 am to McChowder
McChode,
How can I thank you enough for this brilliant dissertation on the anatomy and pathophysiology of the orbit. Alas, it is much easier for me to conceptualize via your description than actually treating these fractures in person.
I suppose that I must inform those dumbasses at the Mayo Clinic and National Trauma Database of the new discoveries uncovered by your genius:
1. Dear Mayo, despite your extensive cavaderic dissections, I hate to be the bearer of bad news. The "honeycombing" is now located in the floor or the orbit; not in the medial wall as you originally suspected. Also, the lamina papyracea (which literally translates to "paper thin layer") of the medial wall is no longer the most commonly fractured portion of the orbit; it is now the floor-mind you, which is "honeycombed" now-because the all-knowing McChode has discovered this.
2. Dear National Trauma Database, I know that you gather data from all of the trauma centers in the US, and it's probably because you're so busy doing this that you overlooked this detail. It seems that you would have us believe that the nasal bones along with the adjacent fragile lacrimal and ethmoid bones are the most commonly encountered fractures of the face, and that the causes in descending order are sports, assaults, falls, and MVA. Well, I have news for you; McChode has had a revelation. Thus, NTDB, you must revise your reports.
While, we're at it could you please elaborate on this mysterious "orbital lobe fracture" to which you have alluded in several of your post, as I cannot find reference to such an entity in the entirety of medical literature.
Thank you McChode for continuing to affirm what a wise man once said, "A stupid man's report of what a clever man says is never accurate because he unconsciously translates what he hears into something he can understand."
ETA: You cannot hit someone "directly in the orbital floor" unless you're fight Sammy Davis Jr and he decides, for some reason, to remove his glass eye, prior to engaging you. There's a friggin eyeball in the way, McDildo.
How can I thank you enough for this brilliant dissertation on the anatomy and pathophysiology of the orbit. Alas, it is much easier for me to conceptualize via your description than actually treating these fractures in person.
I suppose that I must inform those dumbasses at the Mayo Clinic and National Trauma Database of the new discoveries uncovered by your genius:
1. Dear Mayo, despite your extensive cavaderic dissections, I hate to be the bearer of bad news. The "honeycombing" is now located in the floor or the orbit; not in the medial wall as you originally suspected. Also, the lamina papyracea (which literally translates to "paper thin layer") of the medial wall is no longer the most commonly fractured portion of the orbit; it is now the floor-mind you, which is "honeycombed" now-because the all-knowing McChode has discovered this.
2. Dear National Trauma Database, I know that you gather data from all of the trauma centers in the US, and it's probably because you're so busy doing this that you overlooked this detail. It seems that you would have us believe that the nasal bones along with the adjacent fragile lacrimal and ethmoid bones are the most commonly encountered fractures of the face, and that the causes in descending order are sports, assaults, falls, and MVA. Well, I have news for you; McChode has had a revelation. Thus, NTDB, you must revise your reports.
While, we're at it could you please elaborate on this mysterious "orbital lobe fracture" to which you have alluded in several of your post, as I cannot find reference to such an entity in the entirety of medical literature.
Thank you McChode for continuing to affirm what a wise man once said, "A stupid man's report of what a clever man says is never accurate because he unconsciously translates what he hears into something he can understand."
ETA: You cannot hit someone "directly in the orbital floor" unless you're fight Sammy Davis Jr and he decides, for some reason, to remove his glass eye, prior to engaging you. There's a friggin eyeball in the way, McDildo.
This post was edited on 9/27/11 at 7:40 am
Posted on 9/27/11 at 8:55 am to CrimsonTideMD
quote:
You cannot hit someone "directly in the orbital floor" unless you're fight Sammy Davis Jr and he decides, for some reason, to remove his glass eye, prior to engaging you. There's a friggin eyeball in the way, McDildo.
"With blowout fractures, the medial wall is fractured indirectly. When an external force is applied to the orbital cavity from an object whose diameter is larger than that of the orbit, the orbital contents are retropulsed and compressed. The consequent sudden rise in intraorbital pressure is transmitted to the walls of the orbit, which ultimately leads to fractures of the thin medial wall and/or orbital floor. Theoretically, this mechanism should lead to more fractures of the medial wall than the floor, since the medial wall is slightly thinner (0.25 mm vs 0.50 mm). However, it is known that pure blowout fractures most frequently involve the orbital floor."
I misspoke when I said the honeycomb structure made it more susceptible for orbital floor fracture. As you stated it does relate to medial wall but as a justification as to why the wall is less, not more, susceptible to fracture.
1) Blowouts with orbital floor fractures are more common.
2) blowouts with orbital floor fractures are not normally causes by a punch to the nose.
BTW, for whatever reason you are the one that started down this road of personal attack. Is your ego really that fragile? That when someone who doesnt have the lofty credentials of "MD" behind their username on a message board dares try to have a discussion regarding medical issues, Trapper John MD has to swoop in and attack the poster instead of discussing and or elaborating on content? Even if in the end we may not agree, is that really necessary?
One more time..........GET OVER YOURSELF.
This post was edited on 9/27/11 at 9:26 am
Posted on 9/27/11 at 9:15 am to McChowder
Should I add that to your dissertation? My only concern is that its clarity and accurateness would compromise the overarching theme of talking-out-of-your-arse which has characterized all of your previous statements.
Posted on 9/27/11 at 9:23 am to CrimsonTideMD
see above ETA
Posted on 9/27/11 at 10:13 am to McChowder
There is no discussion or disagreement to be had regarding the medical details of this thread; that is the point and the reason for my replies. My original posts spoke to the details in which I have significant experience and training. However, you continued to muddy the waters with haphazard interpretations (please see your expert analysis of the indications for and timing of operations of the orbital floor) of medical lit from google. On the other hand, I am quite over myself, which is why I only speak to the topics I know. You will not find me posting objections to the renderings of other professionals-engineers, CPAs, attorneys, etc. Unfortunately, like me, these professionals usually keep to their lurking, because their posts are buried in garbage by Rantards like you.
BTW: good call on the "BS" of the OP
BTW: good call on the "BS" of the OP
This post was edited on 9/27/11 at 10:31 am
Posted on 9/27/11 at 11:10 am to CrimsonTideMD
quote:
There is no discussion or disagreement to be had regarding the medical details of this thread; that is the point and the reason for my replies.
Glad you cleared that up. For a second I thought the last two pages of chest beating and self adulation actually pertained to content aside from the snide personal attacks.
If I and others take your advice about only contributing to things we are "experts" in, this board would be a ghost town (not everyone here is a football coach or former player). This is an anonymous message board. As such, credibility is usually judged by the content of a post.........not who a person claims to be (Even if he has added MD to the end of his username). I seriously doubt those who had discussed the legal ramifications of the most recent event concerning JJ all had Law licenses, for example.
The rub for you was that you interpreted something I said as a challenge to your supposed expertise and your not-so-little ego caused you to lash out in the form of personal attack.
There really is no point in continuing this conversation. You claim now to be above it but your actions thus far (slinging personal attacks) show differently. You have a fragile ego but that is something you are going to have to deal with, not me..........I've wasted enough of my time stooping to your level.
This post was edited on 9/27/11 at 11:22 am
Posted on 9/27/11 at 6:44 pm to McChowder
McCleverMan,
So let me get this straight:
Sarcasm and banter qualify as lashing out and personal attacks?
And
The guy who ignorantly and unrelentingly proclaims "facts" is NOT egotistical, but the guy who calls him out on his "facts" IS egotistical?
Got it. Both compliment your aforementioned over-arching theme.
So let me get this straight:
Sarcasm and banter qualify as lashing out and personal attacks?
And
The guy who ignorantly and unrelentingly proclaims "facts" is NOT egotistical, but the guy who calls him out on his "facts" IS egotistical?
Got it. Both compliment your aforementioned over-arching theme.
Posted on 9/27/11 at 10:53 pm to CrimsonTideMD
quote:
So let me get this straight:
Sarcasm and banter qualify as lashing out and personal attacks?
Sarcasm and banter? Let's put aside the fact that either was called for and rehash a little. You responded to a post I made about EMTs and protocol regarding head trauma. Up to that point things were civil.
quote:
I know you don't have a dog in the fight, and I'm not trying to be combative.........I just disagree.
Your response...
quote:
McChowderMD..........Had I known you were actually Dr Quinn Medicine Woman masquerading as some know-it-all with internet access...
So yeah, CLEARLY you are lashing out. Again, this is an anonymous message board. You may or may not be an MD. Just because it's in your fcking username on some message board doesn't make it so. Frankly I couldn't give a flip. I'm sure you are a well respected professional whose opinion carries a lot of weight in the real world among people who know you and know what it is you do. I DON'T KNOW YOU. You could be some pimple faced undergrad with a huge superiority complex. Scratch that, you do have a huge superiority complex. The minute someone dared disagree you went on the attack extolling on your own supposed vast knowledge, experience, and credentials.
quote:
...as there is no need for any of my silly, experience-based, surgically-refined, ruminations...... Please provide your contact information so that I may call you today for expert consult should I encounter any problems as I operate.
So excuse me for not automatically bowing down to your self labeled e-cred or daring to have a different opinion (this is a message board after all).
If this isn't about ego, YOUR EGO, why didn't you just simply ignore my post, or agree to disagree? Why did you turn this thread into nasty bickering with snide remarks and name calling?
quote:
McChode
McDildo
DQMW
Please get over yourself. I'm not impressed, not even a little.
<End of conversation>
Posted on 9/28/11 at 8:35 am to McChowder
McCrybaby,
I'm sorry I hurt your feelings, sweet pea.
If you're gonna put on your big girl panties and try to jump into a conversation that's over your head, maybe you should keep them on so you can handle the responses.
If this wasn't about your inferiority complex, why didn't you stop posting your cute little attempts to sound official?
I'm sorry I hurt your feelings, sweet pea.
If you're gonna put on your big girl panties and try to jump into a conversation that's over your head, maybe you should keep them on so you can handle the responses.
If this wasn't about your inferiority complex, why didn't you stop posting your cute little attempts to sound official?
Posted on 9/28/11 at 9:16 am to CrimsonTideMD
Too funny on so many levels.
Anyway, don't let us keep you from your busy surgery schedule. Thanks for the laughs.
Anyway, don't let us keep you from your busy surgery schedule. Thanks for the laughs.
Posted on 9/28/11 at 5:46 pm to McChowder
McChuckles,
Thought it was really funny too. But, I couldn't be certain if it was objectively funny or if that was just my giant ego self-adulating again.
Glad to leave you in better spirits; after all, laughter is the best medicine.
Thought it was really funny too. But, I couldn't be certain if it was objectively funny or if that was just my giant ego self-adulating again.
Glad to leave you in better spirits; after all, laughter is the best medicine.
Page 13 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News