Started By
Message
re: Schools with the toughest SOS
Posted on 9/26/18 at 3:40 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Posted on 9/26/18 at 3:40 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
come back! I want to unpack this a little further, it's not every day you get gold like this on here
You made your point. Now move on.
0
Posted on 9/26/18 at 3:43 pm to Torch
quote:
You could mention how our low SOS doesn't seem to help us out, and we are a shitty team regardless of SOS.
As Torch alludes, Tennessee is a bit of an anomaly in a lot of ways.
I've never understood. Tennessee folks are some of the best you'll ever meet.
I think it starts with karma. Let me spell it out here:
Fat Phil shite
SOS shite
Team shite
Fans deserve better though.
Posted on 9/26/18 at 3:44 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Colo seems to be gone though, the man does not appear dedicated to his craft
Unlike some of you, I have to work.
Posted on 9/26/18 at 3:45 pm to ColoBama
Unlike you. I can multitask
Posted on 9/26/18 at 3:48 pm to lsufball19
quote:
LSU, in 2011, going into the BCS title game, was the #1 team in the country AND had the #1 SOS. So, you're wrong
No he is not wrong he just said if you’re a top five program in contention for NC then this usually doesn’t apply. The idea is that the top teams normally schedule a team that has a great name such as Notre Dame, Michigan or Miami but not necessarily a true top ten team like Ohio State, Oklahoma, Bama Georgia Clemson and Auburn. For a true top ten competing for Nc at the end of the season teams like SC, USC, Florida State are great resume builders. It also helps when usually the sec has two or three teams in the top ten at varying pints in the season. So Alabama Auburn or Georgia don’t need to open with an Ohio State who they will likely see in the playoffs anyway.
Posted on 9/26/18 at 3:50 pm to ColoBama
the bigger concern should be is when will Bama play a team with a pulse?
Posted on 9/26/18 at 3:57 pm to countrytiger60
What about scheduling a home game with Syracuse?
Posted on 9/26/18 at 4:01 pm to Korin
#1 it was a home and home, not just a home game
#2 Syracuse has had good teams in the past, they could have gotten good
#3 LSU has a very good record of OOC scheduling & also somehow seems to draw the better teams in the East most years.
#2 Syracuse has had good teams in the past, they could have gotten good
#3 LSU has a very good record of OOC scheduling & also somehow seems to draw the better teams in the East most years.
Posted on 9/26/18 at 4:07 pm to Draconian Sanctions
And Duke is playing a neutral site game because Alabama played there last time.
Duke has had good teams in the past too, certainly more recently than Syracuse (who hasn't had a winning season since 2013).
Duke has had good teams in the past too, certainly more recently than Syracuse (who hasn't had a winning season since 2013).
This post was edited on 9/26/18 at 4:08 pm
Posted on 9/26/18 at 5:15 pm to Korin
Syracuse all time winning percentage: .578
Duke all time winning percentage: .490
Syracuse is about to win their 700’th game, Duke has yet to win 500. Also you mentioned 2013? After that season was when LSU scheduled the game bc it looked like they were strong good again. Alabama scheduling Duke is pathetic and you know it.
You’re embarrassing yourself.
Duke all time winning percentage: .490
Syracuse is about to win their 700’th game, Duke has yet to win 500. Also you mentioned 2013? After that season was when LSU scheduled the game bc it looked like they were strong good again. Alabama scheduling Duke is pathetic and you know it.
You’re embarrassing yourself.
This post was edited on 9/26/18 at 5:20 pm
Posted on 9/26/18 at 5:19 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Oh, we're going by all-time stuff now? Interesting. Minnesota > LSU using your logic. 
Syracuse went 7-6 in 2013 by the way. Real strong.
Syracuse went 7-6 in 2013 by the way. Real strong.
This post was edited on 9/26/18 at 5:20 pm
Posted on 9/26/18 at 5:20 pm to Korin
LSU has over 100 more wins than Minnesota
Posted on 9/26/18 at 5:21 pm to Draconian Sanctions
But more titles. Can't have it both ways.
And Alabama scheduled Duke when they were coming off of an 8-5 season. D'oh!
And Alabama scheduled Duke when they were coming off of an 8-5 season. D'oh!
This post was edited on 9/26/18 at 5:22 pm
Posted on 9/26/18 at 5:22 pm to Korin
quote:
Syracuse went 7-6 in 2013 by the way. Real strong
It wasn’t that long ago in the grand scheme of things that Syracuse was rolling out Donovan Mcnabb and Dwight Freeney. They are a much much much better program than Duke and could get legitimate good at any time. That we’re even having this conversation is a testament to how asnine some of you clowns are
This post was edited on 9/26/18 at 5:23 pm
Posted on 9/26/18 at 5:22 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Donovan Mcnabb
You just went full Vol. That's 1998.
Posted on 9/26/18 at 5:24 pm to Korin
quote:
But more titles. Can't have it both ways.
And Alabama scheduled Duke when they were coming off of an 8-5 season. D'oh!
You’re struggling brah. I’d like to give you credit for a half decent troll but I’m afraid you really are this dense.
Posted on 9/26/18 at 5:24 pm to Korin
quote:
You just went full Vol. That's 1998
As opposed to 1955 dragging out the gophers?
Posted on 9/26/18 at 5:24 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Alabama scheduled Duke after they went 8-5.
LSU schedules Syracuse after they went 7-6.
LSU schedules Syracuse after they went 7-6.
Posted on 9/26/18 at 5:25 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
As opposed to 1955 dragging out the gophers?
You criticized me for bringing up 2013 and then you went back to 98. Can't have it both ways.
This post was edited on 9/26/18 at 5:25 pm
Posted on 9/26/18 at 5:25 pm to Korin
quote:
Can't have it both ways
I don’t need to
LSU >>>> Minnesota
Syracuse >>>> Duke
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News