Started By
Message
re: Question for A&M fans
Posted on 1/24/14 at 3:00 pm to texashorn
Posted on 1/24/14 at 3:00 pm to texashorn
quote:
texashorn
Member since May 2008
I have posted here since before you migrated over from Malfunction Junction, and likely will continue once you scurry back into your holes.
I missed your initial date, my mistake. That doesn't answer the question, though. Why? To me this is equivalent to signing in on a B1G board to tell B1G fans how much their teams suck. I don't get it.
0
Posted on 1/24/14 at 3:01 pm to texashorn
quote:
Eligibility-restoration requests and infractions matters are not handled by the panel.
Do you know what the frick that actually means? How is that statement inconsistent with this statement, which is more relevant to the general point that t.u. can only win with built-in advantages, a point you are so desperate to rebut:
quote:
Proposed by the NCAA Council as a result of recommendations by the Special Committee to Review NCAA Legislative Procedures, the panel was created to review appeals by member institutions of decisions made by an NCAA committee or the NCAA staff regarding application of legislation to a particular situation.
The panel doesn't restore eligibility (the Eligibility Committee does) of a player and does not handle infraction matters (Committee on Infractions does). But, it does review appeals of how the NCAA staff or committee APPLIES LEGISLATION TO A PARTICULAR INSTITUTION!!!!
Please, keep talking sip. It's so much fun to beat your arse like this.
Posted on 1/24/14 at 3:01 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
What's wrong with a little comic relief?
I've learned from passing through occasionally that your bunch has become almost as big a joke as you were for the 100 years previously among Longhorns, Bears, Owls, Horned Frogs, et al.
I've learned from passing through occasionally that your bunch has become almost as big a joke as you were for the 100 years previously among Longhorns, Bears, Owls, Horned Frogs, et al.
Posted on 1/24/14 at 3:03 pm to texashorn
quote:
What's wrong with a little comic relief?
Comic relief requires actual humor.
Funny = 90's SNL
You = Seth Myers and Jimmy Fallon
Posted on 1/24/14 at 3:03 pm to KaiserSoze99
Good grief, Charlie Brown. Learn how to read.
Yes, the NCAA passed legislation to put A&M on probation. NOT.
Yes, the NCAA passed legislation to put A&M on probation. NOT.
Posted on 1/24/14 at 3:04 pm to texashorn
quote:
I've learned from passing through occasionally that your bunch has become almost as big a joke as you were for the 100 years previously among Longhorns, Bears, Owls, Horned Frogs, et al.
Which is almost but not as big a joke that y'all are to the bible schools that you must now wet nurse and get beat by.
Posted on 1/24/14 at 3:04 pm to texashorn
quote:
almost as big a joke as you were for the 100 years previously among Longhorns, Bears, Owls, Horned Frogs, et al.
...and NONE of those you listed have ANY room to laugh...AT ANYONE....EVER...
Posted on 1/24/14 at 3:06 pm to texashorn
quote:
Yes, the NCAA passed legislation to put A&M on probation. NOT.
If your dumb arse thinks that's what the NCAA statement says, this conversation will be suspended, and will resume after you have completed some reading comprehension classes.
Posted on 1/24/14 at 3:08 pm to KaiserSoze99
You poor soul.
Here, I'll help you. Let's make this simple.
But, it does review appeals of how the NCAA staff or committee APPLIES LEGISLATION TO A PARTICULAR INSTITUTION! EXCEPT INFRACTIONS or PLAYER ELIGIBILITY!
Here, I'll help you. Let's make this simple.
But, it does review appeals of how the NCAA staff or committee APPLIES LEGISLATION TO A PARTICULAR INSTITUTION! EXCEPT INFRACTIONS or PLAYER ELIGIBILITY!
Posted on 1/24/14 at 3:10 pm to texashorn
quote:
Bears, Owls, Horned Frogs, et al.
Losses to Baylor, Rice, and TCU in the last 25 years:
A&M - 2 (2004, 2008)
t.u. - 10 (1989, 1991, 1992, 1992, 1997, 1997, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013)
Posted on 1/24/14 at 3:11 pm to texashorn
Tell me, cocksmoke. What does this statement mean to you:
...and how does that jibe with the meaning and application of the "lack of institutional control" ruling A&M got in 1994?
quote:
application of legislation to a particular situation.
...and how does that jibe with the meaning and application of the "lack of institutional control" ruling A&M got in 1994?
Posted on 1/24/14 at 3:13 pm to texashorn
quote:
I have posted here since before you migrated over from Malfunction Junction...
Turning off the vitriol for a moment, I assume you're talking about texags. That's a pretty good description, at least for the forums there. But I've never posted there and wasn't even aware of it before my A&M roommate (who is a horrible person) recommended it a few years ago. I thought there simply had to be something better, and I was right.
Back to regularly scheduled programming: frick tu.
Posted on 1/24/14 at 3:14 pm to texashorn
Yeah I bet you lurk on our team specific board too. Reading all our threads. So pathetic
Posted on 1/24/14 at 3:14 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
Losses to Baylor, Rice, and TCU in the last 25 years:
A&M - 2 (2004, 2008)
t.u. - 10 (1989, 1991, 1992, 1992, 1997, 1997, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013)
I think this calls for a Boom.
Boom!
Posted on 1/24/14 at 3:14 pm to KaiserSoze99
Because that "lack of institutional control" was applied by the infractions committee, and that decision is beyond the purview of the Administrative Review Panel.
If you think the Administrative Review Panel fiddled with the actual LEGISLATION to "get" A&M, you are a bigger fool than I thought.
If you think the Administrative Review Panel fiddled with the actual LEGISLATION to "get" A&M, you are a bigger fool than I thought.
Posted on 1/24/14 at 3:15 pm to texashorn
To hammer home this point even more:
But, then the paragraph continues with this:
But, as far as I can tell, A&M was the only institution to EVER receive a TV ban for lack of institutional control.
I'll wait for your response.....
quote:
In reaching a decision, the panel considers the purpose and intent of the involved legislation, the welfare of the student-athlete, possible competitive or recruiting advantages and other factors it considers relevant.
But, then the paragraph continues with this:
quote:
The panel strives for consistency in treating issues involving similar circumstances.
But, as far as I can tell, A&M was the only institution to EVER receive a TV ban for lack of institutional control.
I'll wait for your response.....
Posted on 1/24/14 at 3:18 pm to Wishnitwas1998
quote:
I'm sure this is beating a dead horse...
I'm guessing this didn't turn out quite like you expected.
Posted on 1/24/14 at 3:22 pm to KaiserSoze99
quote:
But, as far as I can tell, A&M was the only institution to EVER receive a TV ban for lack of institutional control.
Maryland basketball, 1990.
Maine hockey, 1996.
Ole Miss football, 1986 (later abated).
This post was edited on 1/24/14 at 3:25 pm
Posted on 1/24/14 at 3:22 pm to finestfirst79
No the first 3 or 4 pages were fine.......then the Texas fan showed up 
Posted on 1/24/14 at 3:24 pm to texashorn
quote:
Maryland basketball, 1990.
For "lack of institutional control"?
Page 9 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News