Started By
Message
re: Masoli denied...
Posted on 9/1/10 at 9:57 pm to Woopigsooie20
Posted on 9/1/10 at 9:57 pm to Woopigsooie20
quote:
I see OM fans are still acting like little bitches.
0
Posted on 9/1/10 at 9:59 pm to TTsTowel
quote:
Pequitto?
Malathion will probably go first.
Posted on 9/1/10 at 10:03 pm to NIH
quote:
antoine dodson
Has 4 years of eligibility left. Someone get their arse to Memphis with a quickness.
Posted on 9/1/10 at 10:16 pm to OPR
quote:
Yes. You are so dumb. You are really dumb... fo real.
Dodson is from Georgia homeboy. Hide your wife, hide your kids, better hide your husbands cause they raping everybody out here.... run and tell that homeboy.
Posted on 9/1/10 at 10:52 pm to HawgAlude
From the NCAA today:
Media reports have portrayed several aspects of this case incorrectly. Current NCAA rules do not allow a football graduate student to participate at a school other than the one from which he earned his undergraduate degree without a waiver being granted. Contrary to recent media reports, the rules do not allow such a transfer to “sit out a year” and play the following academic year.
Questions also were raised about the timing of the decision. The decision was communicated to the school within the generally stated three-week time frame for this type of waiver. The NCAA staff received the waiver request from Ole Miss on Aug. 13 and received the final piece of information from the school in the evening of Aug. 30. After considering that final piece of information, the NCAA staff communicated the decision to the school in the morning of Aug. 31
Media reports have portrayed several aspects of this case incorrectly. Current NCAA rules do not allow a football graduate student to participate at a school other than the one from which he earned his undergraduate degree without a waiver being granted. Contrary to recent media reports, the rules do not allow such a transfer to “sit out a year” and play the following academic year.
Questions also were raised about the timing of the decision. The decision was communicated to the school within the generally stated three-week time frame for this type of waiver. The NCAA staff received the waiver request from Ole Miss on Aug. 13 and received the final piece of information from the school in the evening of Aug. 30. After considering that final piece of information, the NCAA staff communicated the decision to the school in the morning of Aug. 31
Posted on 9/1/10 at 11:49 pm to EasyB
Ole Miss Appeal
To: NCAA
From: Hootie
Re: Hurt Feelings
Please let him play this year b/c Stanley sucks balls
Thank you,
Hootie
To: NCAA
From: Hootie
Re: Hurt Feelings
Please let him play this year b/c Stanley sucks balls
Thank you,
Hootie
Posted on 9/1/10 at 11:53 pm to EasyB
quote:
EasyB
Posted on 9/1/10 at 11:56 pm to RebelNutt48
Nutt, if you want a chuckle go read the last couple pages of the dooley thread
Posted on 9/1/10 at 11:56 pm to RebelNutt48
good luck with Jac St this weekend
Posted on 9/2/10 at 9:11 am to EasyB
Ole Miss Appeal
Hahaha, "all he's done is everything he should
"
Go to Hell
quote:
To: NCAA
From: Hootie
Re: Hurt Feelings
Please let him play this year b/c Stanley sucks balls
Thank you,
Hootie
Hahaha, "all he's done is everything he should
" Go to Hell
Posted on 9/2/10 at 9:37 am to Jaydeaux
quote:
"all he's done is everything he should
And as a butthurt LSU fan, so have you. Flame.
FYM & DIAF
Posted on 9/2/10 at 9:38 am to RebFeBrees
Posted on 9/2/10 at 9:39 am to RebFeBrees
I haven't read a single word of this thread. So, first, frick all you haters. Secondly, let's just move on, Rebel fans. Let's get behind Stanley and get ready for some football. It's better for all of our souls to just relax a little.
Posted on 9/2/10 at 9:40 am to DCRebel
quote:
DCRebel
The exact same attitude I am trying to have.
Posted on 9/2/10 at 9:42 am to RebFeBrees
quote:
RebFeBrees
That's what I'm talking about! Come Saturday, I'll be too full of wings and beer to be bummed out over the NCAA and their bullshite.
And, who knows, Stanley could just ball the frick out of control this year and shock the world... Or, at least he could be a decent SEC qb. (NOT GONNA HAPPEN RABBULS CAUZE HE GOTS dA QuAtReBaCk KiLuR!!!)
This post was edited on 9/2/10 at 9:43 am
Posted on 9/2/10 at 9:45 am to DCRebel
quote:
I haven't read a single word of this thread.
I tried to read a little bit of the thread but I just stopped. Arky fans in this thread have gone batshit over this and are using this event like their own personal victory over us. nearly 3 years of frustrations on their part are flowing out like Niagara at the moment. How can you argue with them when they've lost all remaining sanity?
Posted on 9/2/10 at 9:46 am to DCRebel
quote:
Stanley
As long as he's not Jevan "20 INT" Snead I'll be happy. Our run game should be solid.
Facked.
Posted on 9/2/10 at 9:48 am to Billy Mays
quote:
As long as he's not Jevan "20 INT" Snead I'll be happy. Our run game should be solid.
Facked.
This. As far as Masoli, I am pretty shocked but I'll get over it pretty quickly.
As I said before, worse case scenario is he doesn't play and we're right back where we were post-Cotton and pre-Masoli. Only exception is that Stanley has looked pretty damned good since Masoli stepped on campus.
Hell, IIRC he only has 5-6 incompletions in the two saturday scrimmages combined.
Posted on 9/2/10 at 9:53 am to Billy Mays
So the guy that wrote THIS for the NCAA...
"By Ronnie Ramos
NCAA.org
The case of Jeremiah Masoli, the quarterback who graduated from Oregon and has enrolled at Ole Miss, has brought attention to the NCAA’s waiver process for graduate students.
The NCAA this week granted Masoli a waiver to play at Mississippi but ruled he must wait until the 2011-12 season.
In its decision, the NCAA staff noted Masoli was unable to participate at Oregon based on his dismissal from the team, which is contrary to the intent of the waiver opportunity. The waiver process exists to provide relief to student-athletes who transfer to pursue graduate studies for academic reasons. The staff reasoned that the intent was not for student-athletes to avoid disciplinary measures at another university.
Mississippi is appealing the NCAA decision.
NCAA member institutions, which approve the rules governing the eligibility of graduate student-athletes, have debated the best way to handle such cases.
In 2007, the membership overwhelmingly overrode a rule change that allowed all graduate student transfers to be eligible immediately if they met specific conditions. Instead, the membership supported a waiver process with third-party scrutiny to resolve cases that are academically motivated.
The 2007 override vote drew comments from both sides of the issue. At the end, there was strong support for continuing academically based waivers and for a supporting process.
Student-athletes should be “able to transfer through a waiver process that has quality control, because it is for academic and not athletic reasons,” Carol Iwaoka, associate commissioner for governance at the Big Ten Conference said at the 2007 Convention. The Big Ten argued to have the waiver process “in place so those student-athletes who truly deserve to transfer for financial, academic or personal reasons can still have access in that manner.”
Other groups in favor of the waiver process included the National Association of Basketball Coaches, which was represented by its executive director, James Haney.
Members also cited a concern that without a case-by-case review of waiver requests, there could be a second round of recruiting for players who have graduated and still have eligibility remaining.
“Let’s create new legislation that will provide flexibility for those deserving student-athletes who have the support of their institutions without creating a chaotic free agency,” said Kenneth Kavanagh of Bradley.
Media reports have portrayed several aspects of this case incorrectly. Current NCAA rules do not allow a football graduate student to participate at a school other than the one from which he earned his undergraduate degree without a waiver being granted. Contrary to recent media reports, the rules do not allow such a transfer to “sit out a year” and play the following academic year.
Questions also were raised about the timing of the decision. The decision was communicated to the school within the generally stated three-week time frame for this type of waiver. The NCAA staff received the waiver request from Ole Miss on Aug. 13 and received the final piece of information from the school in the evening of Aug. 30. After considering that final piece of information, the NCAA staff communicated the decision to the school in the morning of Aug. 31"
In defense of their decision, just re-tweeted this...
"dennisdoddcbs Can't compare Ingram to Masoli. Bad break for Ingram. Not much sympathy for free-agent, mercenary law bender Masoli."
Please try to defend the righteousness of the NCAA now. The dislike him, period. That and ONLY that is the reason they are denying him.
If there were no personal bias against Masoli, this tweet would read...
"Can't compare Ingram to Masoli. Bad break for Ingram. Masoli did not follow the intent of the rule."
"By Ronnie Ramos
NCAA.org
The case of Jeremiah Masoli, the quarterback who graduated from Oregon and has enrolled at Ole Miss, has brought attention to the NCAA’s waiver process for graduate students.
The NCAA this week granted Masoli a waiver to play at Mississippi but ruled he must wait until the 2011-12 season.
In its decision, the NCAA staff noted Masoli was unable to participate at Oregon based on his dismissal from the team, which is contrary to the intent of the waiver opportunity. The waiver process exists to provide relief to student-athletes who transfer to pursue graduate studies for academic reasons. The staff reasoned that the intent was not for student-athletes to avoid disciplinary measures at another university.
Mississippi is appealing the NCAA decision.
NCAA member institutions, which approve the rules governing the eligibility of graduate student-athletes, have debated the best way to handle such cases.
In 2007, the membership overwhelmingly overrode a rule change that allowed all graduate student transfers to be eligible immediately if they met specific conditions. Instead, the membership supported a waiver process with third-party scrutiny to resolve cases that are academically motivated.
The 2007 override vote drew comments from both sides of the issue. At the end, there was strong support for continuing academically based waivers and for a supporting process.
Student-athletes should be “able to transfer through a waiver process that has quality control, because it is for academic and not athletic reasons,” Carol Iwaoka, associate commissioner for governance at the Big Ten Conference said at the 2007 Convention. The Big Ten argued to have the waiver process “in place so those student-athletes who truly deserve to transfer for financial, academic or personal reasons can still have access in that manner.”
Other groups in favor of the waiver process included the National Association of Basketball Coaches, which was represented by its executive director, James Haney.
Members also cited a concern that without a case-by-case review of waiver requests, there could be a second round of recruiting for players who have graduated and still have eligibility remaining.
“Let’s create new legislation that will provide flexibility for those deserving student-athletes who have the support of their institutions without creating a chaotic free agency,” said Kenneth Kavanagh of Bradley.
Media reports have portrayed several aspects of this case incorrectly. Current NCAA rules do not allow a football graduate student to participate at a school other than the one from which he earned his undergraduate degree without a waiver being granted. Contrary to recent media reports, the rules do not allow such a transfer to “sit out a year” and play the following academic year.
Questions also were raised about the timing of the decision. The decision was communicated to the school within the generally stated three-week time frame for this type of waiver. The NCAA staff received the waiver request from Ole Miss on Aug. 13 and received the final piece of information from the school in the evening of Aug. 30. After considering that final piece of information, the NCAA staff communicated the decision to the school in the morning of Aug. 31"
In defense of their decision, just re-tweeted this...
"dennisdoddcbs Can't compare Ingram to Masoli. Bad break for Ingram. Not much sympathy for free-agent, mercenary law bender Masoli."
Please try to defend the righteousness of the NCAA now. The dislike him, period. That and ONLY that is the reason they are denying him.
If there were no personal bias against Masoli, this tweet would read...
"Can't compare Ingram to Masoli. Bad break for Ingram. Masoli did not follow the intent of the rule."
Posted on 9/2/10 at 9:59 am to OPR
Page 27 of 32
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News