1
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/15/11 at 9:22 pm to Colonel Flagg
quote:
I am an LSU alum.
I was just stating my opinion after watching Gruden's QB camp.
YEah I know Flagg I just hit respond because you were the last one on there. I was talking to the arky fans because Ive never seen such a fragile collective ego over where their quarterback goes in a draft.
Posted on 4/15/11 at 9:24 pm to GamecockAlum
quote:
He's the best quarterback prospect in this draft imo.
Is that really saying something in this "meh" class of QBs?
It was a great choice to come out this year, because there is way more competition in the 2012 class...
This post was edited on 4/15/11 at 9:25 pm
Posted on 4/15/11 at 9:39 pm to MagillaGuerilla
quote:
me out this year, because there is way more competition in the 2012 class...
Luck and????
Pryor is a future Tight End/WR.
Barkley has no business coming out yet.
Landry Jones is legit, but he's no Sam Bradford.
I know I'm forgetting someone else but whatever.
Posted on 4/15/11 at 9:42 pm to GamecockAlum
Wel I've figured out why Arky fans have such a complex over whether Mallet goes in the first or not- They've only had six first rounders since they joined the SEC! in fact going back to 1990, theyve only had six.
Posted on 4/15/11 at 9:44 pm to secfan123
I'm a USC guy who could give a frick about Mallett and I have mad respeck for the kids talents and have become very impressed with his composure in dealing with the bullshite allegations and accusations being hurled at him.
Meanwhile, anytime someone doesn't kiss Newton's arse he folds like a lawnchair and gets all uppity and mad.
Meanwhile, anytime someone doesn't kiss Newton's arse he folds like a lawnchair and gets all uppity and mad.
Posted on 4/15/11 at 9:59 pm to GamecockAlum
quote:
Pryor is a future Tight End/WR.
I wasn't gonna list Pryor TBH.
quote:
Barkley has no business coming out yet.
The same was said about Mark Sanchez, yet he still went top 10.
Potential Top 2012 Draft Eligible QBs(no order)
A.Luck
M.Barkley
N.Foles
A.Murray
L.Jones
R.Lindley
Then you have your Moores, Griffins, Keenums, Weedens, and Osweilers that could play themselves into the top 2 Rds...
This post was edited on 4/15/11 at 10:05 pm
Posted on 4/15/11 at 10:05 pm to secfan123
quote:
OK seriously pigs, does this guy going in the first round validate something for y'all? does it make that loss to slohio st sting a little less or something? does it make you feel better that he couldnt get yall into the top 10 and choked two winnable games away? is it something tangible to point to and say, "see! we have a good program cause our quarterback got picked in the first round!"really, ive never seen so many threads about where a guy may go, and so many fans so damn worried about it. Jesus, I'd like for Ingram to go in the first but if he doesn't, i'll spend about 5 seconds thinking "that sucks" and then move the frick on. Damn.
Mr. secfan123, what you have just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
ETA: Did not read.
This post was edited on 4/15/11 at 10:06 pm
Posted on 4/15/11 at 10:18 pm to MagillaGuerilla
quote:
A.Luck
M.Barkley
N.Foles
A.Murray
L.Jones
These 5 are the only ones with legit first round potential, but Barkley won't be one until 2013, if at all, same goes for Murray.
quote:
Moores
The best this kid can hope for is a 6th round pity pick from some team looking for a real gym rat.
quote:
Griffins
Vince Young Volume 2.
quote:
Keenums
There's a reason why this cat went back to school.
quote:
Weedens
Chris Weinke Volume 2.
quote:
Osweilers
You silly goose, Back-up quarterbacks who have gone 86-164 aren't second round picks. That's just plain silly talk.
Posted on 4/15/11 at 10:41 pm to GamecockAlum
quote:
These 5 are the only ones with legit first round potential, but Barkley won't be one until 2013, if at all, same goes for Murray.
Money talks, and mine is on Barkley leaving after this season, he literally could not accomplish anything else if he came back.
And I'd say 5 QBs is more than 3 he is competing with this year.
quote:
The best this kid can hope for is a 6th round pity pick from some team looking for a real gym rat.
If he performs well in post season workouts, he'll climb. 2nd is probably best case scenario...
quote:
Vince Young Volume 2.
He's more like Vick than Young. Good agility, nice arm potential.
quote:
There's a reason why this cat went back to school.
He was injured
quote:
Chris Weinke Volume 2.
His former baseball career and age is the only thing that compares to Weinke.
quote:
You silly goose, Back-up quarterbacks who have gone 86-164 aren't second round picks. That's just plain silly talk.
He's now the starter and has impressed so far. He played well against UCLA and Arizona at the tail end of last season.
You can't teach his size, athleticism, or arm strength.
Besides, don't act like top QBs don't come out of nowhere. Very few would have thought Gabbert and Newton would have been the top 2 QBs this time last year...
This post was edited on 4/15/11 at 10:58 pm
Posted on 4/16/11 at 1:06 pm to MagillaGuerilla
quote:
Money talks, and mine is on Barkley leaving after this season, he literally could not accomplish anything else if he came back.
He would have to have an epic Heisman-esque year and I just don't see that happening.
quote:
If he performs well in post season workouts, he'll climb. 2nd is probably best case scenario...
I just don't see Moore being higher than 4th or 5th rounder. He's undersized, he doesn't have a great arm, he plays in a gimmick offense, and he's not some big leadership guy, not to mention he has very little experience playing competition at or above his level. There's no shame in being a career back-up though. Just ask Jim Sorgi.
quote:
He's more like Vick than Young. Good agility, nice arm potential.
The offense he plays in is similar to the one Young excelled in. He's just not as big, and unfortunately not as good of a passer. He is in an Air Raid-esque offense that throws in some options/reads. He is a great athlete, but he is in an offense taylormade for success (his back-up did aight in the same system).
quote:
He was injured
Didn't stop Bradford from coming out. I like Keenum (no homo), but I don't see the guy being a high pick or being more than a spot starter.
quote:
His former baseball career and age is the only thing that compares to Weinke.
And weinke was more proven/better, and he was
quote:
He's now the starter and has impressed so far. He played well against UCLA and Arizona at the tail end of last season.
He did play well against UCLA (who didn't??), however he went 22-49 vs. Arizona. That's not a good game. At best that's a below average game.
I just don't see this guy going from career back-up to potential second round pick in one year. Typically those kind of players don't have to wait until injuries set in to start in college.
quote:
Very few would have thought Gabbert and Newton would have been the top 2 QBs this time last year...
Gabbert was on the radar last year and was a highly rated passer coming out of high school (I wanna say he was a 5-Star but don't quote me on that).
Newton has bust written all over him. The only positive from his passing is that he has a decently strong arm. Ask Michael Vick and Vince Young how long you last as a quarterback when your legs are by far better than your arm.
Posted on 4/16/11 at 1:16 pm to secfan123
quote:
OK seriously pigs, does this guy going in the first round validate something for y'all?
Yes. We've said all along he's a top QB prospect who will go in the first round, and guys like Kiper, McShay, and tons of people on here basically laughed at us. If he goes first round, it validates our analysis and opinion on Mallett and validates the fact we are right and the haters were wrong once again.
quote:
does it make that loss to slohio st sting a little less or something?
What the frick does this discussion have to do with tOSU. You were the only one who brought that game up. Does talking down to Arky's make you feel better about losing to Louisiana Monroe or Utah? GTFO. (I think you're a Bama fan, you're ignorant enough to be one.)
quote:
does it make you feel better that he couldnt get yall into the top 10 and choked two winnable games away?
Does saying this make you feel better that Bama was 5th place in the SEC and your QB isn't half the pro prospect Mallett is?
quote:
is it something tangible to point to and say, "see! we have a good program cause our quarterback got picked in the first round!"
Yes, it is.
quote:
really, ive never seen so many threads about where a guy may go, and so many fans so damn worried about it.
Mallett's draft stock has fluctuated more than anyone else's. I've heard he could go #1, I've heard he could go 3rd round. There is a lot of misinformation and debate about his pro potential, and that leads to a lot of discussion. Get the frick over it you pussy.
This post was edited on 4/16/11 at 1:17 pm
Posted on 4/16/11 at 1:17 pm to adammwilson
quote:
I'm here and I have nothing to add. This is some no name blogger type trying to make a name for himself.
I'm not replying to this thread again.
As opposed to a no name message board poster who wants other posters to think he is some kind of expert in football.
Posted on 4/16/11 at 1:20 pm to theenemy
But he watches a lot of game footage!!!! And that's just in the last couple of seasons! 
Posted on 4/16/11 at 1:32 pm to secfan123
quote:
OK seriously pigs, does this guy going in the first round validate something for y'all?
You really can't understand it?
Ryan Mallett is an Arkansas Razorback.
Razorback fans love their players and support them.
Many threads on this board have been started claiming Mallett will be the next Ryan Leaf.
Those threads have put Hog posters on the defense because they want to support our guy.
Alot on unsubstantiated rumors came out about Mallett that have made Hog posters even more defensive.
It has nothing to do with validating anything. Its about supporting our players and having their backs.
Posted on 4/16/11 at 1:36 pm to theenemy
quote:
As opposed to a no name message board poster who wants other posters to think he is some kind of expert in football.
Exactly, and add to that the drug rumors came from a no name website looking for hits, but he believed that. Nobody has anything on Mallett. They're throwing shite against the wall hoping it sticks.
quote:
But he watches a lot of game footage!!!! And that's just in the last couple of seasons!
All of his credibility goes out the window as he defends Locker as a great QB. Locker is about as accurate as a Musket from The American Revolution.
This post was edited on 4/16/11 at 1:40 pm
Posted on 4/16/11 at 1:44 pm to Woopigsooie20
And Locker hardly ever misses games!!!
Posted on 4/16/11 at 1:46 pm to GamecockAlum
It's ok, it's not his fault. Blame his offensive line. We can make excuses for Locker, and Locker only.
Posted on 4/16/11 at 1:46 pm to Woopigsooie20
Phil Simms isn't a no-name blogger trying to make a name, right?
“@AdamSchefter: Phil Simms with Tim Ryan and Pat Kirwan on QB Ryan Mallett: "If he's not a top 10 player (in this draft), then I quit."”
“@AdamSchefter: Phil Simms with Tim Ryan and Pat Kirwan on QB Ryan Mallett: "If he's not a top 10 player (in this draft), then I quit."”
Posted on 4/16/11 at 1:54 pm to Woopigsooie20
quote:
It's ok, it's not his fault. Blame his offensive line. We can make excuses for Locker, and Locker only.
But he is a such a leader!!!
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News