Started By
Message
re: Looking back....A&M vs Texas in the SEC.........update p 26
Posted on 9/26/19 at 7:00 am to KaiserSoze99
Posted on 9/26/19 at 7:00 am to KaiserSoze99
This
Is why we don’t need your victimy whining. I can read every single one of your posts in Chuck-Schumer’s-‘bout-to-cry voice.
We have a home and home with Texas. We beat them better Than the score indicated. Here came aggies saying, “see, we told you they’d turn up the heat in the locker rooms. They’re dirty. That’s why we opted not to play them”.
You’re just scared, or not an attractive opponent. .....which has been the point of this whole thread.
I’d rather have 7 of 8 victories over Texas and not aggy.....there’s just no notoriety for beating a never-was like atm.
Recognize that, Victim.
quote:
It was you, the fricking Longhorns who would not agree to equal partnership in the network, and proof of that is in subsequent t-sip actions in forming that albatross you have now, which prevents a conference network
Is why we don’t need your victimy whining. I can read every single one of your posts in Chuck-Schumer’s-‘bout-to-cry voice.
We have a home and home with Texas. We beat them better Than the score indicated. Here came aggies saying, “see, we told you they’d turn up the heat in the locker rooms. They’re dirty. That’s why we opted not to play them”.
You’re just scared, or not an attractive opponent. .....which has been the point of this whole thread.
I’d rather have 7 of 8 victories over Texas and not aggy.....there’s just no notoriety for beating a never-was like atm.
Recognize that, Victim.
Posted on 9/26/19 at 7:04 am to dstone12
quote:
I’d rather have
Well you and 3 little horns are the only one that agree with you
This post was edited on 9/26/19 at 7:05 am
Posted on 9/26/19 at 7:05 am to dstone12
Do you enjoy getting your e-arse beat down at this magnitude?
You MUST be a mind-fricked masochist or something.
You MUST be a mind-fricked masochist or something.
Posted on 9/26/19 at 7:08 am to Old Sarge
Sarge, it was fun destroying you. But now you’re hitting submit without even typing anything..........
I feel bad picking on you old man.
Must
Type
Stuff
Before
Submitting
‘Member that, Victim
And run over to B hall and pull cheese grits out of the bed. It’s 8am ET. He was there and we need his account of what happened at the expansion/tv talks.
I feel bad picking on you old man.

Must
Type
Stuff
Before
Submitting
‘Member that, Victim
And run over to B hall and pull cheese grits out of the bed. It’s 8am ET. He was there and we need his account of what happened at the expansion/tv talks.
Posted on 9/26/19 at 7:12 am to dstone12
You’re reaching new levels of mad at Sarge every day, keep going, we are all entertained


Posted on 9/26/19 at 7:12 am to Old Sarge
quote:
10 pages of EVERYONE making fun of you
What makes it even better is that this is the ultimate moot point argument. You either have Missouri, A&M, and Arkansas in the SEC or you have Texas. Since the three that are here have no intention of leaving that pretty well leaves Texas high and dry.
Broyles probably would have held his nose and voted for Texas to join the SEC if they had tried back in the day. With him gone there is zero chance any AD from the group of three would vote to let the Horns in.
Letting Texas into the SEC is like the old parable of the scorpion and the fox. Both want to cross the river but the scorpion can't swim and the fox is afraid the scorpion will sting him. So the scorpion agrees to ride on the fox's back and refrain from stinging him. Halfway across the scorpion stings the fox and they both drown. Why? Because it is the scorpion's nature.
It is the nature of the Texas Longhorns to be lousy conference mates.
Posted on 9/26/19 at 7:14 am to Arksulli
Now dstone12 will respond to you with 700 words describing how he isn’t mad at Old Sarge 

Posted on 9/26/19 at 7:18 am to Arksulli
quote:
You either have Missouri, A&M, and Arkansas in the SEC or you have Texas..
All three combined......combined have 5 legitimate national titles (atm retro-claimed 2) dating back to the 1960s.
All three schools literally not worth a damn.
Now used your head victim, who would the sec rather have?
This post was edited on 9/26/19 at 7:20 am
Posted on 9/26/19 at 7:20 am to Arksulli
quote:
What makes it even better is that this is the ultimate moot point argument. You either have Missouri, A&M, and Arkansas in the SEC or you have Texas. Since the three that are here have no intention of leaving that pretty well leaves Texas high and dry.
Broyles probably would have held his nose and voted for Texas to join the SEC if they had tried back in the day. With him gone there is zero chance any AD from the group of three would vote to let the Horns in.
Letting Texas into the SEC is like the old parable of the scorpion and the fox. Both want to cross the river but the scorpion can't swim and the fox is afraid the scorpion will sting him. So the scorpion agrees to ride on the fox's back and refrain from stinging him. Halfway across the scorpion stings the fox and they both drown. Why? Because it is the scorpion's nature.
It is the nature of the Texas Longhorns to be lousy conference mates.
All those who have ever dealt with the fricking longhorns are screaming "No,No,No" and yet, we get these threads. I can only conclude that this shite is ignorance or the OP is so arse hurt that he would rather cut off his nose to spite his face.
This post was edited on 9/26/19 at 7:21 am
Posted on 9/26/19 at 7:25 am to dstone12
quote:
Now used your head victim, who would the sec rather have?
*snort*
Victim? Yes, tragically Arkansas, A&M, and Missouri are all victims of being in a stable conference with equal revenue sharing and equal rights for every member.
My God, what a tragedy! What a catastrophe it is to be the victim of such a heinous turn of events!
How will we ever console ourselves facing such a terrible fate?
Posted on 9/26/19 at 7:25 am to dstone12

Posted on 9/26/19 at 7:27 am to dstone12
quote:
All three combined......combined have 5 legitimate national titles (atm retro-claimed 2) dating back to the 1960s.
All three schools literally not worth a damn.
Now used your head victim, who would the sec rather have?
And your dumb arse has ZERO understanding of conference partnerships or business in general. You are a child.
You think on-the-field success or championships IN ONE SPORT matters in conference alignment. You and "business" do not belong in the same motherfricking sentence. Again, you are a child.
Now go back to being mad at Sarge.
This post was edited on 9/26/19 at 7:29 am
Posted on 9/26/19 at 7:28 am to dstone12
Look at dstone downvoting all 11 pages while upvoting his own 3. Pathetic. RA RA!!
Posted on 9/26/19 at 7:29 am to KaiserSoze99
quote:
All those who have ever dealt with the fricking longhorns are screaming "No,No,No" and yet, we get these threads. I can only conclude that this shite is ignorance or the OP is so arse hurt that he would rather cut off his nose to spite his face
Yep.......Victim
quote:
You think on-the-field success or championships IN ONE SPORT matters in conference alignment. you in business do not belong in the same motherfricking sentence. Again, you are a child. Now go back to being mad at Sarge.
Yep.....triggered
All three schools not worth a damn.
ATM only has one legit title from the thirties before they retro-claimed 2........pathetic.
LSU has 3 legit. You three were not worth it, but thanks for tv footprint......that was the only thing you were good for.
This post was edited on 9/26/19 at 7:35 am
Posted on 9/26/19 at 7:37 am to dstone12
quote:
Yep.......Victim
Yep....no-business-acumen child who is mad at Sarge.

quote:
Yep.....triggered
Yep....we're here and the pussy sips are not, nor will they ever be, and there's not a goddamn thing you can do about it but continue to cry and be mad at Sarge.

Cry, little bitch. Cry. CRY!!!

This post was edited on 9/26/19 at 7:38 am
Posted on 9/26/19 at 7:40 am to dstone12
quote:
LSU has 3 legit. You three were not worth it, but thanks for tv footprint......that was the only thing you were good fo
And we would be happy to take LSU's share of the TV money, since that means nothing.
Cry bitch.

Posted on 9/26/19 at 7:45 am to KaiserSoze99
And now, a live look at dstone12 in this thread


Posted on 9/26/19 at 7:48 am to KaiserSoze99
Still, you know, he might be on to something about inviting teams with lots of football national titles to join the SEC. Princeton and Yale have a combined 55 nattys maybe we should check and see if they want to join? I mean why let in a minor player like Texas when we can get the best?
Posted on 9/26/19 at 7:49 am to Old Sarge
This dude MUST have some ties to the fricking longhorns. He is repeating all their bullshite from 2011 and demonstrating an equal child-like lack of understanding of what drives conference alignments and the partnership nature of conference affiliation.
Posted on 9/26/19 at 7:51 am to Arksulli
quote:
Still, you know, he might be on to something about inviting teams with lots of football national titles to join the SEC. Princeton and Yale have a combined 55 nattys maybe we should check and see if they want to join? I mean why let in a minor player like Texas when we can get the best
I started to say this very thing, but this dude seems like he's about 15 years old. He has no understanding of the history of college football or what drives business partnerships. He is a child.
And he is still mad at Sarge.
Back to top
