Started By
Message
0
Posted on 9/7/09 at 9:34 pm to inelishaitrust
quote:
goes out to all Arky fans talking trash about the Ole Miss game.
Why don't you give us your expert analysis of the game?
Posted on 9/7/09 at 9:39 pm to Choctaw Hog
quote:
Why don't you give us your expert analysis of the game?
I'm no expert, but I know a little bit.
In short, Arkansas played a team that is bad for an FCS team. They beat them pretty bad. The quarterbacks threw a bunch of easy passes to a bunch of open recievers. The WR's look good. I feel sorry London Crawford. Alex Tejada is apparently going to be a super senior because he's working on a second sophomore slump.
Arkansas has a deep backfield. Michael Smith is still a beast. Arkansas defense was lacking as was the offensive line.
Posted on 9/7/09 at 9:40 pm to inelishaitrust
quote:
As good as always. Just recovering today
I got a test tomorrow. Schools blows more than Gene Chizik.
Posted on 9/7/09 at 9:43 pm to mmjones87
The first two drives took 6 and 4 plays.
The second drive was 74 yds in 4 plays.
After that point we were up 3 tds, you saw us rotate in basically our entire second string, minus the center.
We could have scored at will on them all night. After we were up 21-3, it became a scrimmage.
We dominated that shitty FCS opponent completely.
The second drive was 74 yds in 4 plays.
After that point we were up 3 tds, you saw us rotate in basically our entire second string, minus the center.
We could have scored at will on them all night. After we were up 21-3, it became a scrimmage.
We dominated that shitty FCS opponent completely.
Posted on 9/7/09 at 9:47 pm to wmr
quote:
We dominated that shitty FCS opponent completely.
Shitty is an understatement.
I'm not playing down Arkansas' victory.
I'm just trying to say that any Arkansas fan talking trash about the Ole Miss game has absolutely nothing to back him up.
Posted on 9/7/09 at 9:50 pm to wmr
wmr, I disagree. We didn't dominate them completely.
They made about 200 yards. when you kick it out of bounds 3 times and start at the 40 you can say for arguments sake 200 yards should have or could have been good for about 3 scores had a few things gone their way.
Arkansas also could not run the ball very well on that team. I think if you take away the fluke k.o return to open the game and a few more things go Mo. States way we only won that game by about 28. I only thought we were 4 touchdowns better but I don't think you realize how weak that program is. I'd compare it to a bad Uca team or a good arkasnas tech team.
They made about 200 yards. when you kick it out of bounds 3 times and start at the 40 you can say for arguments sake 200 yards should have or could have been good for about 3 scores had a few things gone their way.
Arkansas also could not run the ball very well on that team. I think if you take away the fluke k.o return to open the game and a few more things go Mo. States way we only won that game by about 28. I only thought we were 4 touchdowns better but I don't think you realize how weak that program is. I'd compare it to a bad Uca team or a good arkasnas tech team.
Posted on 9/7/09 at 9:53 pm to wildrebeltime
quote:
Arkansas also could not run the ball very well on that team.
I figured that Arkansas would do a better job of running on the worst FCS run Defense last year.
That's why I figured the Offensive line was a failure.
Posted on 9/7/09 at 9:54 pm to inelishaitrust
We dominated our opponent thoroughly within 5 minutes of kick-off.
Ole Miss struggled to put the game away until the 4th Qtr.
There really isn't a lot of similarity between the two games.
Unless I'm supposed to believe that Memphis is good just because Ole Miss couldn't put them away.
Memphis looked terrible. They had no offense. They couldn't even hold onto the ball in the first quarter because they were so unprepared.
Missouri State sucks. But we couldn't have jumped on them much harder than we did.
We could have put 70 on them. It wouldn't have proven anything.
Mallett looks fundamentally better than Snead, IMO. Snead throws off his back foot. He made some poor decisions. Mallett had as good of a game as he could be expected to have.
Watch it again and see him throw 30 and 40 yd frozen ropes.
I've never seen Snead make throws like that. He throws rainbows if its over 10 yds.
I watched our game twice and I don't really get the point of your O post.
Ole Miss struggled to put the game away until the 4th Qtr.
There really isn't a lot of similarity between the two games.
Unless I'm supposed to believe that Memphis is good just because Ole Miss couldn't put them away.
Memphis looked terrible. They had no offense. They couldn't even hold onto the ball in the first quarter because they were so unprepared.
Missouri State sucks. But we couldn't have jumped on them much harder than we did.
We could have put 70 on them. It wouldn't have proven anything.
Mallett looks fundamentally better than Snead, IMO. Snead throws off his back foot. He made some poor decisions. Mallett had as good of a game as he could be expected to have.
Watch it again and see him throw 30 and 40 yd frozen ropes.
I've never seen Snead make throws like that. He throws rainbows if its over 10 yds.
I watched our game twice and I don't really get the point of your O post.
Posted on 9/7/09 at 9:59 pm to wmr
memphis looked terrible and had no offense b/c Ole miss has a great defense. They are fast in the secondary and powerful at the LOS.
If memphis were to play mo. state I think they'd Memphis would win by about 5 touchdowns. I think Memphis vs Arkansas would actually be a good game. Alot of that Memphis team was transfers from SEC and other bcs programs that the broadcasters were admiting they were taking chances on.
Mallett has a better arm than Snead but it's not that much better. Snead can throw about 70 yards which is well above average for college and Mallett can throw 80. Big deal. Snead has had the flu and was playing a much better team. also, Mallett has scrimmaged for weaks against a much more lackluster defense and faced on saturday.
Snead is much more mobile and that is the QB I would want. all I see out of Mallett so far is arm strength.
If memphis were to play mo. state I think they'd Memphis would win by about 5 touchdowns. I think Memphis vs Arkansas would actually be a good game. Alot of that Memphis team was transfers from SEC and other bcs programs that the broadcasters were admiting they were taking chances on.
Mallett has a better arm than Snead but it's not that much better. Snead can throw about 70 yards which is well above average for college and Mallett can throw 80. Big deal. Snead has had the flu and was playing a much better team. also, Mallett has scrimmaged for weaks against a much more lackluster defense and faced on saturday.
Snead is much more mobile and that is the QB I would want. all I see out of Mallett so far is arm strength.
This post was edited on 9/7/09 at 10:01 pm
Posted on 9/7/09 at 10:00 pm to inelishaitrust
quote:
Arkansas defense was lacking as was the offensive line.
Petrino stated that there were several run plays he called that he shouldn’t have because he knew they weren't going to work because of the defense the Bears were running. He called them anyway just to see what would happen.
Rest assured that Petrino won't be doing that in tough games. This will be an Arkansas team that will be able to run and pass with great efficiency depending on what the defense gives us. We've haven't had that capability in over a decade.
Posted on 9/7/09 at 10:00 pm to wmr
quote:
Unless I'm supposed to believe that Memphis is good just because Ole Miss couldn't put them away.
Memphis looked terrible. They had no offense. They couldn't even hold onto the ball in the first quarter because they were so unprepared.
You're supposed to believe that Memphis is pretty good because they were a bowl team that returned 14 starters. We held them to half of their yard total from last year and held them to 3.6 yards per rush and 3.7 yards yards per pass They are good for a CUSA team. They'll be in another bowl. We also have a at least 14 players who have swine flu.
quote:
There really isn't a lot of similarity between the two games.
This wasn't what I was trying to say. The point is that Arkansas proved nothing in their victory over Mizzou State because they beat a team that had no business being in the game to begin with. It's another thing if Arkansas had done that to a mid tier CUSA team or hell at least a good 1AA team.
Posted on 9/7/09 at 10:02 pm to inelishaitrust
Petrino mentioned in his presser...we didnt run as much as we wanted because they stacked nine in the box.
The idea that you can stack the box against this team is dead....Mallet and/or Wilson will pick you apart in the secondary.
OH and Zero sacks last year we gave up 4 to West Illi.
The idea that you can stack the box against this team is dead....Mallet and/or Wilson will pick you apart in the secondary.
OH and Zero sacks last year we gave up 4 to West Illi.
Posted on 9/7/09 at 10:04 pm to wildrebeltime
quote:
I think Memphis vs Arkansas would actually be a good game. Alot of that Memphis team was transfers from SEC and other bcs programs that the broadcasters were admiting they were taking chances on.
I do not agree with this.
I do think that Memphis would be able to move the ball on Arkansas alot better.
Arkansas would score more points.
We started rusty. It happens.
Posted on 9/7/09 at 10:06 pm to wildrebeltime
quote:
Mallett has a better arm than Snead but it's not that much better. Snead can throw about 70 yards which is well above average for college and Mallett can throw 80.
Mallet can also throw the across the field deep out...Snead cant...as it almost led to a Pick6 for Memphis yesterday. Mallets one deep out was to the outside shoulder of his receiver who was right at the sideline. Umm additionally Wildfailuretime Mallet was extremely accurate, Snead not so much.
Posted on 9/7/09 at 10:07 pm to Cruiserhog
quote:
Mallet can also throw the across the field deep out...Snead cant
Posted on 9/7/09 at 10:07 pm to mmjones87
quote:
Nice win for the coward though.
talk about obsessed.
:obsessed:
Posted on 9/7/09 at 10:08 pm to Billy Mays
Why are you laughing, the one Snead threw yesterday damn near got took to the house by the Blue team. Hell look at the replays. The Sec digital network is there for all to see.
Posted on 9/7/09 at 10:09 pm to Cruiserhog
Mallett nor Wilson is going to pick apart a well coached SEC secondary. They'll be lucky to complete half their passes. I think what you saw out of Arkansas vs Bama last year is what you are going to see alot more of. Casey dick was better his last 2 years here than Mallett or Wilson is going to be this year. Maybe in the future Mallett will be better but not this year.
Certainly Lsu and Georiga are 2 teams on the schedule that have been chronically underacheiving lately so it might not be as bad but Ole Miss, Bama and Florida will throttle them
Certainly Lsu and Georiga are 2 teams on the schedule that have been chronically underacheiving lately so it might not be as bad but Ole Miss, Bama and Florida will throttle them
Posted on 9/7/09 at 10:10 pm to Cruiserhog
quote:
Mallet can also throw the across the field deep out...Snead cant...as it almost led to a Pick6 for Memphis yesterday.
Umm. Snead didn't hit it yesterday.
He hit it last year, though. He doesn't have Mallet's arm but he has a #1 draft pick arm.
quote:
Umm additionally Wildfailuretime Mallet was extremely accurate, Snead not so much.
Mallet was throwing to open recievers with no pressure from the D-line the entire game. He completed 41% of his passes at Michigan. Please save the trash talk for when you guys play a team that is in the top league of the game. I don't think you see Manchester United talk trash about beating Coca Cola championship teams.
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News