Started By
Message
re: Joining the SEC - from the Missouri perspective
Posted on 10/21/16 at 9:27 am to Mizzou Mule
Posted on 10/21/16 at 9:27 am to Mizzou Mule
ATM, Mizzou & SEC all three won.
This post was edited on 10/21/16 at 9:29 am
Posted on 10/21/16 at 9:43 am to CGSC Lobotomy
As I said when I first read the article on the Mizzou forum, you can really lay the death spiral the Big 12 is locked in at the feet of Texas and Oklahoma.
But for the sheer petulant arrogance and greed of those schools I think Colorado might have been the only school to leave the conference and that only because they have steadily identified more and more with the Pacific Coast over middle America.
But for the sheer petulant arrogance and greed of those schools I think Colorado might have been the only school to leave the conference and that only because they have steadily identified more and more with the Pacific Coast over middle America.
Posted on 10/21/16 at 9:51 am to Arksulli
Out of place but I wish ne was playing in the pac12.
Posted on 10/21/16 at 10:18 am to BHMKyle
I agree with you. In hindsight, adding the Texas schools to the Big Eight was disastrous. But the Big Eight had a real problem in the midst of the power conference arms race: tiny population base. Colorado, Missouri, Nebraska, Iowa, Kansas, and Oklahoma. Compared to the population bases of the other conferences, it was screwed in the long run. Especially when you consider that Colorado, the only school that brought a truly large metro following, wanted to bolt for the PAC as far back as I can remember.
Back to top
