Started By
Message
re: James Franklin v. Dan Mullen v. Gene Chizik
Posted on 7/18/12 at 7:53 pm to NIH
Posted on 7/18/12 at 7:53 pm to NIH
quote:
along with a 37-11 record over the past three years, and a 41-13 record if you include the playoffs.
Oh, so we are comparing a 6 year career at the same place to a 3 year career?
Sounds reasonable.
Posted on 7/18/12 at 7:54 pm to NIH
Posted on 7/18/12 at 7:54 pm to NIH
quote:
Brees has had an all star supporting cast pretty much every year outside of 07 & '08. Multiple All-Pro OL, Will Smith at DE, Vilma at LB, Porter and Greer at the corners, Jenkins at safety, Graham who is the best TE in football, Colston, McAllister in '06, Sproles, PT, etc.
So New Orleans would have won the Super Bowl even without Brees?
Posted on 7/18/12 at 7:55 pm to joeyb147
Do you see Chizik having some kind of future like that? I don't.
Posted on 7/18/12 at 7:55 pm to NorthGwinnettTiger
Nope, but he wouldn't have won one without us. Unlike Cam and MSU or a bunch of other teams.
Posted on 7/18/12 at 7:55 pm to NIH
quote:
a 37-11 record
Chizik has a 30-10 record
Posted on 7/18/12 at 7:56 pm to Mullen3:16
Mullen.
Mullen is very very underrated. He will do great once he gets out of Starkville. Miss St. is one of the hardest places to win in the SEC.
Mullen is very very underrated. He will do great once he gets out of Starkville. Miss St. is one of the hardest places to win in the SEC.
Posted on 7/18/12 at 7:56 pm to NorthGwinnettTiger
Outside of 2010 he is 14-10 in the regular season. Congrats.
Posted on 7/18/12 at 7:57 pm to NIH
quote:
Nope, but he wouldn't have won one without us. Unlike Cam and MSU or a bunch of other teams.
And Cam wouldn't have won one without the senior offensive line, Lutzenkirchen, Dyer and Fairley.
Posted on 7/18/12 at 7:57 pm to NIH
quote:
Do you see Chizik having some kind of future like that? I don't.
Ah, the good ole knowledgeable, future card reading strategy.
I really don't give a shite what your future predictions are. They are as meaningful to me as my morning bowel movements.
Posted on 7/18/12 at 7:59 pm to NIH
quote:
Outside of 2010 he is 14-10 in the regular season. Congrats.
In Belichick's first 3 seasons at NE, you take away the 2001 SB, he's 14-18.
What a shitty coach.
Posted on 7/18/12 at 7:59 pm to NIH
quote:
Outside of 2010 he is 14-10 in the regular season. Congrats.
Outside of 2010, Mullen is 11-13 in the regular season. Congrats.
Posted on 7/18/12 at 8:00 pm to NorthGwinnettTiger
quote:
And Cam wouldn't have won one without the senior offensive line, Lutzenkirchen, Dyer and Fairley.
True statement.
Posted on 7/18/12 at 8:10 pm to NIH
quote:
damn good record
Just about par for the course for the .483 winning percentage of MSU over the lifetime of their school. I can see why you all are okay with him.
Posted on 7/18/12 at 8:39 pm to NIH
Winning at AU is obviously a lot easier than winning at State. Could Chizik have success at State? Plenty of coaches have AU won at AU. Besides Jackie, only Mullen has won at State.
Posted on 7/18/12 at 8:43 pm to Requiem For A Dawg
quote:
only Mullen has won at State.
What's he won? Besides the egg bowl?
And the billboard/rhetoric war?
This post was edited on 7/18/12 at 8:44 pm
Posted on 7/18/12 at 8:47 pm to joeyb147
quote:
I really don't give a shite what your future predictions are. They are as meaningful to me as my morning bowel movements.
I wouldn't even give his predictions that much credit. My morning shites are very important and if I don't get one in before work I'm usually in a bad mood all day.
Posted on 7/18/12 at 8:48 pm to NorthGwinnettTiger
quote:
What's he won?
Um, more games than we're used to winning.
Popular
Back to top


1







