Started By
Message
re: Is Penn State on the hook for Vandy's upgrades?
Posted on 1/10/14 at 7:32 am to SquirrelyBama
Posted on 1/10/14 at 7:32 am to SquirrelyBama
quote:
Great leverage tool by both parties Franklin asked for a commitment and Vandy did the same. This holding up in court could be a problem, but this contract clause will old serious weight in negotiations.
People keep saying this, but why would it not hold up? He agreed to it.
0
Posted on 1/10/14 at 8:23 am to smash williams
quote:
This seems like bad press for trying to find a replacement.
Indeed
Posted on 1/10/14 at 8:24 am to beaver
absolutely
Posted on 1/10/14 at 8:26 am to SquirrelyBama
quote:
Franklin asked for a commitment and Vandy did the same. This holding up in court could be a problem, but this contract clause will old serious weight in negotiations.
I don't see how vandy can force penn state to pay it directly, but they can have the buyout be the cost of the facility that franklin has to pay, and obviously he wouldn't go to penn state unless they paid it, becuase he's not going to pay it out of his pocket (so just like a typical buyout at that point)
Posted on 1/10/14 at 9:42 am to piggidyphish
It's like contracts don't exist to sports fans. Franklin would owe money to Vandy. Penn State would owe salary to Franklin. Vandy then gets money straight from State.
Page 2 of 2
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News