Started By
Message
re: Future of CFB
Posted on 12/26/21 at 4:28 pm to winston1970
Posted on 12/26/21 at 4:28 pm to winston1970
Who is Moo U? I'd guess Mississippi State.
1
Posted on 12/26/21 at 4:33 pm to NEOJoe
The integrity of the sport is something that I'm worried about.
Could it be good for the sport to have 2 giant monopolies, each as rich as can be, with everybody else as essentially a lower division? I don't think so.
But is there any way to better balance money among 4 or 5 'Power' conferences?
Could it be good for the sport to have 2 giant monopolies, each as rich as can be, with everybody else as essentially a lower division? I don't think so.
But is there any way to better balance money among 4 or 5 'Power' conferences?
Posted on 12/26/21 at 5:00 pm to VACane
I read the title as "The future of CNB" and thought SC had lost another poster.....
Posted on 12/26/21 at 5:06 pm to VACane
quote:
Who is Moo U? I'd guess Mississippi State.
You’d be gosh dang right, brother!
Posted on 12/27/21 at 10:48 am to cbi8
Given those cowbells, shouldn't Mississippi State be the Bulls rather than Bulldogs?
Posted on 12/27/21 at 12:14 pm to VACane
There will eventually be 2 leagues: An "affiliated" league, a pro minor league seperate from the schools, but paying to use the associated school logo and facilities. Then there will be a scholarship league where non NFL prospects can play for an education.
This post was edited on 12/27/21 at 12:16 pm
Posted on 12/27/21 at 12:47 pm to VACane
I believe there are still currently 65 teams in the Power Five.
I'm currently of the opinion that in conjunction with moving to an eight-team playoff (or more), we seem to be going the super-conference route, with four conferences of 16 teams (top 64).
You'd have to somehow otherwise equalize the schedules, IMO, and have divisional champions perhaps with wildcards, like the NFL.
One would assume that those outside of the 64 could have their own structure, or still play somewhere in the bowl system.
There's a chance that none of this will actually happen, or that the numbers could be altered (like top 32, for example), but I feel like this is at least the impetus for what we've been seeing in general.
I'm currently of the opinion that in conjunction with moving to an eight-team playoff (or more), we seem to be going the super-conference route, with four conferences of 16 teams (top 64).
You'd have to somehow otherwise equalize the schedules, IMO, and have divisional champions perhaps with wildcards, like the NFL.
One would assume that those outside of the 64 could have their own structure, or still play somewhere in the bowl system.
There's a chance that none of this will actually happen, or that the numbers could be altered (like top 32, for example), but I feel like this is at least the impetus for what we've been seeing in general.
Posted on 12/27/21 at 12:49 pm to VACane
quote:
He expects both the Big ten and the SEC to expand to 20 or maybe even 24 members.
The all-SEC schedule last season did it for me.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 2:52 pm to Drydock
Which schools will be in each grouping, and how will that be decided?
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News