Started By
Message
re: does bama really want a rematch with LSU?
Posted on 11/8/11 at 6:52 pm to heartbreakTiger
Posted on 11/8/11 at 6:52 pm to heartbreakTiger
Bama is "undefeated in regulation" - worked in 07? (after two OT losses)
If Stanford and Ok state lose and the voters want Bama/LSU as a rematch in NO...seems fair (thinks LSU should get a 3pt advantage to start the game...) Home game for LSU basically. Colleague was stating it would be "unfair' for LSU to have to play Bama twice - Bama would be able to scheme better...well, that works both ways, and Bama would have "extra motivation" - which, I contend LSU wouldn't really be worried about that. If the voters don't want the rematch..well, we (Bama) should have figured out how to get players in/out of the huddle a little better (or not committed anyone of a myriad of errors)
If the voters say no, I at least hope Bama gets Boise St. That match up really appeals to me. I think Boise gets 8 maybe 9 quality possessions and has to score on 5 of them.
If Stanford and Ok state lose and the voters want Bama/LSU as a rematch in NO...seems fair (thinks LSU should get a 3pt advantage to start the game...) Home game for LSU basically. Colleague was stating it would be "unfair' for LSU to have to play Bama twice - Bama would be able to scheme better...well, that works both ways, and Bama would have "extra motivation" - which, I contend LSU wouldn't really be worried about that. If the voters don't want the rematch..well, we (Bama) should have figured out how to get players in/out of the huddle a little better (or not committed anyone of a myriad of errors)
If the voters say no, I at least hope Bama gets Boise St. That match up really appeals to me. I think Boise gets 8 maybe 9 quality possessions and has to score on 5 of them.
Popular
Back to top

0




