Started By
Message

re: DGB Suspended Indefinitely

Posted on 4/8/14 at 1:51 pm to
Posted by Cockopotamus
Member since Jan 2013
15930 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

South Carolina fans are the one that brought up Copelin, first.



It was a relevant post about Mizzou's depth at WR, which was brought up by a Mizzou fan.

And to correct your previous post, Clowney was doing 100 in a 70. If thats more serious than disturbing the peace, why did Copelin get booked while Clowney drove away?
Posted by kilo
No block, no rock
Member since Oct 2011
29580 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 1:53 pm to
quote:

And to correct your previous post, Clowney was doing 100 in a 70. If thats more serious than disturbing the peace, why did Copelin get booked while Clowney drove away?


Because Colombia PD doesnt SEC like you all yet.


Jadeveon Clowney ticketed for doing 110



This post was edited on 4/8/14 at 1:56 pm
Posted by Cockopotamus
Member since Jan 2013
15930 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 1:58 pm to
In a 70. Not a 60.

You originally had 100 so I just went with that. Nice edit job

eta-
quote:

Just saying brah, you made it about something other than DGB.



Mizzou fans brought up Clowney which is completely unrelated to DGB. Copelin isn't unrelated since someone was talking about WR depth.

I personally just said DGB hasn't done shite at Mizzou unless directly replying to some idiotic Mizzou posters Clowney comment
This post was edited on 4/8/14 at 2:02 pm
Posted by kilo
No block, no rock
Member since Oct 2011
29580 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

In a 70. Not a 60.

You originally had 100 so I just went with that. Nice edit job


Huh?

So 100 in a 60 is somehow better than 110 in a 70?

Do you all even Math in South Carolina?

Posted by MIZ_COU
I'm right here
Member since Oct 2013
13771 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 2:00 pm to
Clowney lazy
Spurrier old
Posted by kilo
No block, no rock
Member since Oct 2011
29580 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

Mizzou fans brought up Clowney which is completely unrelated to DGB. Copelin isn't unrelated since someone was talking about WR depth.


Sure man. Some low level Misdemeanor somehow screws up our depth chart with a guy that may or may not be 3rd in the depth chart at the Y when the year starts....

quote:

I personally just said DGB hasn't done shite at Mizzou


Which is just trolling bull shite yet you all are just here to honestly discuss DGB's arrest.


This post was edited on 4/8/14 at 2:11 pm
Posted by Cockopotamus
Member since Jan 2013
15930 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 2:12 pm to
quote:

Huh?

So 100 in a 60 is somehow better than 110 in a 70?

Do you all even Math in South Carolina?



Jesus Christ.

Posted by Cockopotamus
Member since Jan 2013
15930 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 2:14 pm to
quote:

Which is just trolling bull shite yet you all are just here to honestly discuss DGB's arrest.



If its bullshite then why has nobody provided a proper response?

Instead its all been deflection to and about Clowney
Posted by kilo
No block, no rock
Member since Oct 2011
29580 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 2:20 pm to
quote:

If its bullshite then why has nobody provided a proper response?


True Sophomore:
Catches 59 Yards 883 YPC15.0 LONG 68 TD's 12

Thats 9th in the SEC and better than anything South Carolina had, but he hasnt done shite.

Mizzou is STACKED at WR, the ball got spread around alot in that offense.

So one of two things is happening, you are trolling or you are just dumb. Hard to tell at this point.

Posted by kilo
No block, no rock
Member since Oct 2011
29580 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

Jesus Christ.


I know, I know.

Posted by Cockopotamus
Member since Jan 2013
15930 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 2:25 pm to
Right, but like I said it was all against shite tier defenses.
Posted by kilo
No block, no rock
Member since Oct 2011
29580 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

Right, but like I said it was all against shite tier defenses.


Whatever man. Im not even mad, all I can do is just SMH at your bullshite and obsession.

There is not one team in this conference that wouldnt want DGB, minus the boneheaded off the field issues, on their team next year including you.

Posted by Cockopotamus
Member since Jan 2013
15930 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

There is not one team in this conference that wouldnt want DGB, minus the boneheaded off the field issues, on their team next year including you.



Out of high school? No doubt

Now that hes officially a bust? I'll pass.

quote:

your bullshite and obsession.


How is it obsession to post DGB related thing in a DGB thread?

Those that are obsessed brought up Clowney, who is completely irrelevant to this conversation.
Posted by reedus23
St. Louis
Member since Sep 2011
25492 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 2:49 pm to
I would suspect no one is going to put up monstrous numbers at Mizzou. A shite load of receivers were rotated in and the ball was spread around a lot. Same at RB. Three RB's got similar numbers in terms of carries. So none of them are going to put up huge numbers. But just because you spread the ball around to a number of people doesn't mean the kid is a bust. I don't think he's lived up to the #1 recruit in the nation billing but he's far from a bust. I'd bet his numbers were just about where GP would have liked to have seen them in relation to the other receivers.
Posted by MIZ_COU
I'm right here
Member since Oct 2013
13771 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 2:51 pm to
He's made some great catches and some monster blocks. You have to wonder with that kind of size and speed what's he doing at WR
Posted by JDHLaw
Member since Jun 2013
1040 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

True Sophomore: Catches 59 Yards 883 YPC15.0 LONG 68 TD's 12 Thats 9th in the SEC and better than anything South Carolina had, but he hasnt done shite. Mizzou is STACKED at WR, the ball got spread around alot in that offense. So one of two things is happening, you are trolling or you are just dumb. Hard to tell at this point.


If DGB gets prosecuted for assaulting a girl and is kicked off the team, Missouri returns WR/TE personnel that accounted for 59 receptions, 757 yards receiving and 3 receiving touchdowns from the 2013 totals.

That's approximately 24% of the receptions, 22% of the yards, and 10% of the touchdowns.

I'm not sure how that deserves a "STAKED OMG WTF" exclamation.

Sure, it was spread around a lot among a bunch of kids who, by and large, aren't coming back this year.
Posted by kilo
No block, no rock
Member since Oct 2011
29580 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 2:54 pm to
Anyone calling him a "bust" because of only being 9th in the SEC in yards and tied for first in TD's as a 20 year old true SO just doesnt have a lick of football acumen.

Posted by wstorie44
Farmington
Member since Dec 2012
3193 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 2:54 pm to
Was posed to have a big year Mauks favorite target. That's if his arse can stayout the doghouse long enuff.
Posted by kilo
No block, no rock
Member since Oct 2011
29580 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

I'm not sure how that deserves a "STAKED OMG WTF" exclamation.


Because we were talking about last year and why the numbers were spread out through our WR core because of that depth.

Its really not that hard to follow along.

Posted by JDHLaw
Member since Jun 2013
1040 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

Because we were talking about last year and why the numbers were spread out through our WR core because of that depth. Its really not that hard to follow along.


Ah, so you meant to type was stacked, not is stacked.

Carry on.
Jump to page
Page First 10 11 12 13 14
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 12 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter