Started By
Message
1
Posted on 8/3/09 at 3:56 pm to GoHoGsGo06
there's a whole lot of stupid in this thread. having an opinion is one thing but basing that opinion on stupid is another.
Posted on 8/3/09 at 3:57 pm to The Ramp
This post was edited on 8/3/09 at 3:59 pm
Posted on 8/3/09 at 3:58 pm to GoHoGsGo06
quote:
there's a whole lot of stupid in this thread. having an opinion is one thing but basing that opinion on stupid is another.
I've used facts to back my opinion, you?
Posted on 8/3/09 at 4:00 pm to GoHoGsGo06
facts: selective games and an appalacian state corner back?
i'll take the opinion of sportswriters and sec coaches thank you.
i'm not saying he's even better than michael smith but to say some of those other tomato cans are better and calling him "fat" reeks of the stupid.
i'll take the opinion of sportswriters and sec coaches thank you.
i'm not saying he's even better than michael smith but to say some of those other tomato cans are better and calling him "fat" reeks of the stupid.
Posted on 8/3/09 at 4:01 pm to GoHoGsGo06
quote:
3) For probably the 3 toughest SEC teams, for each both Ark and LSU, to play last year (Florida, Ole Miss, Bama)
Michael Smith = 353 yards (6.09 yards/carry)
Charles Scott = 137 yards (2.98 yards/carry)
In 2 of the 3 well fell behind and pretty much had to abandon the run in the second half. That may have something to do with it...Posted on 8/3/09 at 4:07 pm to The Ramp
quote:
facts: selective games and an appalacian state corner back?
Scott getting caught from behind, 1st play of video
Good RBs dont get caught with that kind of lead
quote:
i'll take the opinion of sportswriters and sec coaches thank you.
ok, i dont care. The media picked Auburn to win the west last year too
quote:
i'm not saying he's even better than michael smith but to say some of those other tomato cans are better and calling him "fat" reeks of the stupid.
Sorry, if someone is slow, then in my opinion they are considered fat if they look the part, and he does look the part. 5'11 233 lbs He is pretty pudgy.
Posted on 8/3/09 at 4:11 pm to XbengalTiger
quote:
In those 3 games:
LSU combined rushes = 92
Arkansas combined rushes:= 81
Try again please
Posted on 8/3/09 at 4:13 pm to GoHoGsGo06
quote:
Good RBs dont get caught with that kind of lead
"When I see a defense, especially a good one, I'm going to bring it to you all night until you get tired of it," Scott said. "It's going to be me and you and me and you all night, and we're going to see who quits first."
Posted on 8/3/09 at 4:13 pm to The Ramp
quote:
facts: selective games
Of course i am using selective games, trying to find common opponents. I'm comparing them to the same competition
Posted on 8/3/09 at 4:13 pm to TheDoc
great I can't think of any better 3backs
Posted on 8/3/09 at 4:15 pm to GoHoGsGo06
pudgy?
This post was edited on 8/3/09 at 4:16 pm
Posted on 8/3/09 at 4:18 pm to GoHoGsGo06
quote:
Good RBs dont get caught with that kind of lead
it's common knowledge that a cornerback is faster than a 233 lb running back
quote:
ok, i dont care. The media picked Auburn to win the west last year too
they're pretty dead on with all-sec selections
quote:
Sorry, if someone is slow, then in my opinion they are considered fat if they look the part, and he does look the part. 5'11 233 lbs He is pretty pudgy.
dude. i doubt you've ever seen him play if you think he's "pudgy". i guess peyton hillis was a lard arse too
Posted on 8/3/09 at 4:18 pm to TheDoc
quote:
pudgy?
He is. He isnt ripped.
But back to the best runningback debate, do you not agree Michael Smith is a better back, in terms of production?
Posted on 8/3/09 at 4:20 pm to The Ramp
quote:
it's common knowledge that a cornerback is faster than a 233 lb running back
Not with that kind of a lead, if he is really "All SEC"
quote:
they're pretty dead on with all-sec selections
says Auburn and Ole Miss last year
quote:
dude. i doubt you've ever seen him play if you think he's "pudgy". i guess peyton hillis was a lard arse too
i have seen him play, as i said earlier i have. Hillis was kind of pudgy, but of course he is playing an FB/RB hybrid in the NFL now, as he looks like.
This post was edited on 8/3/09 at 4:22 pm
Posted on 8/3/09 at 4:21 pm to GoHoGsGo06
quote:
He is. He isnt ripped.
you really are losing this badly
quote:
But back to the best runningback debate, do you not agree Michael Smith is a better back, in terms of production?
i agree. but CS is still one of the better returning backs in the league.
seriously, you base your opinion on someone being "fat", one play, and three games? that's why no one takes you seriously.
Posted on 8/3/09 at 4:24 pm to The Ramp
i'm done. i can't argue the stupid. Hillis is pudgy? my gawd. CS prolly runs a 4.7 and the ASU corner runs a 4.5. so yeah, he will catch him as he would most big RBs. it was nice talking to you. i think i'll go argue with a 3 year old over santa claus now. might be more interesting.
btw-CS plays FB as well
btw-CS plays FB as well
Posted on 8/3/09 at 4:24 pm to The Ramp
quote:
seriously, you base your opinion on someone being "fat", one play, and three games? that's why no one takes you seriously.
no im not basing my comparison on 3 games.
Im basing it on the season, and using common teams played for stats, simple as that.
LINK
LINK
I have already said he is one of the bette backs in the league, but just that he is not the top like most people/media make him out to be. He will end up 3-5 in my opinion. To get to my opinion, i use facts, not homerism.
Posted on 8/3/09 at 4:24 pm to GoHoGsGo06
quote:
says Auburn and Ole Miss last year
i didn't know auburn and ole miss were all sec players
Posted on 8/3/09 at 4:24 pm to The Ramp
quote:
i'm done. i can't argue the stupid. Hillis is pudgy? my gawd. CS prolly runs a 4.7
thanks, case closed. Good RBs dont run 4.7
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News