Started By
Message
re: Cadillac & Brown vs. Ingram & TR
Posted on 12/21/09 at 4:04 pm to Turbeauxdog
Posted on 12/21/09 at 4:04 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
Not even close. Caddy and Brown are better.
TR is a freshman and MI is a sophmore. Lets see what they can do with an extra year under their belt.
1
Posted on 12/21/09 at 4:05 pm to piggidyphish
Dude didnt Ark murder the shite out of Auburn this year? 
Posted on 12/21/09 at 4:05 pm to FleshEatingSalsa
cant say they wont be better but CW and RB were both top 10 picks in the draft.. so right now I go with them easily
Posted on 12/21/09 at 4:06 pm to TruLsu
I'm just going off of college production, not draft status.
Posted on 12/21/09 at 4:07 pm to TruLsu
quote:
cant say they wont be better but CW and RB were both top 10 picks in the draft.. so right now I go with them easily
And if TR and MI were draft-eligible and didn't go as high, I'd give your post some credit, but as it stands:
FAIL.
Posted on 12/21/09 at 4:07 pm to danfraz
Cecil Collins>Caddy, Brown, Jacobs>Ingram TR
Posted on 12/21/09 at 4:07 pm to FleshEatingSalsa
quote:
I'll bet you're a hit with the farm animals.
Stupid post get a stupid reply...we were even...but I suppose now I'm obligated to reply to this one.
This post was edited on 12/21/09 at 4:09 pm
Posted on 12/21/09 at 4:08 pm to FleshEatingSalsa
quote:if you really think right now ingram and TR would both go top 10 youre an idiot.. they are good no doubt but come on
And if TR and MI were draft-eligible and didn't go as high
Posted on 12/21/09 at 4:08 pm to FleshEatingSalsa
I am enjoying this thread... actually any thread of Bama vs The Barn I find amusing
Posted on 12/21/09 at 4:08 pm to FleshEatingSalsa
They won't.. Maybe Trent, not Mark.
Posted on 12/21/09 at 4:09 pm to TruLsu
I just don't get what the draft has to do with this discussion. Are we not discussing who the better "college" duo is?
Posted on 12/21/09 at 4:10 pm to ACL11190
quote:nothing wrong with looking at it like this
I'm just going off of college production, not draft status.
Posted on 12/21/09 at 4:10 pm to TruLsu
quote:
if you really think right now ingram and TR would both go top 10 youre an idiot.. they are good no doubt but come on
Ultimately, it doesn't even apply to this discussion. This is about production at the college football level and MI has already smacked the shite out of anything CW or RB EVER did.
Posted on 12/21/09 at 4:11 pm to ACL11190
quote:if this said in college then i would say the draft has nothing to do with this.
A Barn homer posted on a recent thread that Cadillac and Brown were better and it's "not even close yet"
Posted on 12/21/09 at 4:11 pm to TruLsu
quote:
nothing wrong with looking at it like this
We aren't talking about who is the better pro prospect duo.
Posted on 12/21/09 at 4:12 pm to hehatedrew
I liked Caddy and Brown but I certainly don't worship them. Ingram and Richardson are going to be productive NFL backs and they will put up better numbers than Caddy and Brown did.
Ronnie Brown and Caddy were looked at so highly because of how much better they were than the rest of the backs in the SEC at that time. Comparing now and then is pointless because things change.
Ronnie Brown and Caddy were looked at so highly because of how much better they were than the rest of the backs in the SEC at that time. Comparing now and then is pointless because things change.
Posted on 12/21/09 at 4:14 pm to ACL11190
quote:i read who is better out of the 2, the OP didnt say who was better in college. For that to be determined we will have to see how MI and TR do next year and the year after, you have to take the full body of work, not just one individual year
We aren't talking about who is the better pro prospect duo.
ETA: just my 2 cents on the argument
This post was edited on 12/21/09 at 4:16 pm
Posted on 12/21/09 at 4:15 pm to TruLsu
quote:
the OP didnt say who was better in college
I was hoping all those college stats I posted might clue you in.
Posted on 12/21/09 at 4:17 pm to TruLsu
quote:
For that to be determined we will have to see how MI and TR do next year and the year after, you have to take the full body of work, not just one individual year
I never even said they were better, i just said this.
quote:
Ingram is 19 and Richardson is 18. Ingram is just as good NOW as either of them were in college. If Richardson makes the same improvment from his fr to soph year that Ingram did then watch out.
Posted on 12/21/09 at 4:19 pm to ACL11190
just stating my opinion on determining who was better
Page 3 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News