Started By
Message
re: Brooooooooks Story - Bama
Posted on 4/7/11 at 9:13 pm to Robot Santa
Posted on 4/7/11 at 9:13 pm to Robot Santa
quote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but hasn't it been said that this guy is a longtime friend of Calloway's dad? If he is, the rules are a bit different I believe
True, if there's an established relationship, the rules are different. I'm sure the timing of the payments and the fact Peaches was obviously hell bent on BC going to Bama will play a part.
The relationship angle might be the angle Bama has to play. I'm starting to wonder since Peaches hasn't denied this yet, JLee might be on to something.
This post was edited on 4/7/11 at 9:14 pm
1
Posted on 4/7/11 at 9:15 pm to Bryant34
Funny how you bammers idiots can't read and understand the story. By definition this guy is a booster. I don't know if any of the claims are true, but he is a booster. JLee not coming out and saying that? Choosing his words carefully. That's not exactly proof the claims are false. Besides, Lee isn't making the claims...it's more of the same "sources say" crap that drove the Newton story.
Posted on 4/7/11 at 9:16 pm to CFBFAN1121
Jlee is on something not onto something,biggest homer in the history of sports,just tryin to throw shite at the wall and see if it sticks cause Auburn hires players...
Posted on 4/7/11 at 9:21 pm to Buck Sweep
quote:
Funny how you bammers idiots can't read and understand the story. By definition this guy is a booster. I don't know if any of the claims are true, but he is a booster. JLee not coming out and saying that? Choosing his words carefully. That's not exactly proof the claims are false. Besides, Lee isn't making the claims...it's more of the same "sources say" crap that drove the Newton story.
You're an idiot. Just because Jeff Lee says he has a source doesn't mean he really has a source. The source could be himself making shite up. And no "sources" drove the Cam Newton story. Cecil Newton came out and admitted that he tried to get money from Mississippi State.
Posted on 4/7/11 at 9:23 pm to Buck Sweep
quote:
Funny how you bammers idiots can't read and understand the story.
Whose story? Jeff Lee? Or every other sportwriter/commentator calling bullshite?
quote:
By definition this guy is a booster.
Then does that mean Jeff Lee has the world's worst prose, by repeatedly calling him a supporter, or is he just an idiot?
quote:
I don't know if any of the claims are true,
Probably should have stopped here.
quote:
but he is a booster.
But you didn't, now you're spouting off things you have no idea about. Congratulations!
quote:
JLee not coming out and saying that?
No, he's not. Six or seven times he said "supporter" rather than "booster." Can you not read?
quote:
Choosing his words carefully.
No, a "supporter" and a "booster" in the context of what he is talking about (ncaa regs) are two different concepts with two different meanings. If he meant one, he would say it.
quote:
That's not exactly proof the claims are false.
No, its proof he heard a rumor and ran with it, while fully admitting he has zero evidence to back it up.
quote:
Besides, Lee isn't making the claims...it's more of the same "sources say" crap that drove the Newton story.
Yeah, except NEwton came out and admittted he talked pay for play. Kinda of a BIG difference.
Posted on 4/7/11 at 9:25 pm to RollTide1987
Some of these Cow fans are the very definition of homers,hell one of em could be the failed abortion that is J.Lee.. 
This post was edited on 4/7/11 at 9:27 pm
Posted on 4/7/11 at 9:27 pm to Buck Sweep
quote:
Funny how you bammers idiots can't read and understand the story
This, it's funny how bammers are
this article but don't realize the clarification SBB makes makes this situation much WORSE for Bama. Ok, so JLee called him a supporter and not a booster...wouldn't be the first time JLee was wrong.
If you're a bammer, you want this dude to be a supporter and not a booster.
Posted on 4/7/11 at 9:29 pm to TT9
quote:
Jlee is on something not onto something,biggest homer in the history of sports,just tryin to throw shite at the wall and see if it sticks cause Auburn hires players...
In your opinion, why hasn't Peaches denied this very serious allegation?
Posted on 4/7/11 at 9:29 pm to secfan123
You stupid frick. It matters not what JLee calls the guy, supporter, fig, whatever. To the NCAA, he's a fricking booster you dick wad.
This post was edited on 4/7/11 at 9:34 pm
Posted on 4/7/11 at 9:30 pm to CFBFAN1121
quote:
If you're a bammer, you want this dude to be a supporter and not a booster.
Neither is good. We'd be MUCH safer if he were on our Board of Trustees.
Posted on 4/7/11 at 9:31 pm to secfan123
quote:
Yeah, except NEwton came out and admittted he talked pay for play. Kinda of a BIG difference.
You're right. Talking pay for play isn't against the rules. Getting paid is where the shite hits the fan.
Posted on 4/7/11 at 9:32 pm to CFBFAN1121
quote:
This, it's funny how bammers are this article but don't realize the clarification SBB makes makes this situation much WORSE for Bama.
Of course it does. Except that Brooks isnt sure either. He's pointing out that Lee danced around the topic b/c he had zero evidence of what he was spouting. We know this because Brooks called bullshite on the whole thing. Realy, if Brooks wont run with something, you KNOW there's nothing there.
quote:
Ok, so JLee called him a supporter and not a booster...wouldn't be the first time JLee was wrong.
So he's too stupid to figure out he should have written "booster" rather than "supporter" yet he has the goods to take a football program down? REALLY? Do you pull your head out of your arse BEFORE you write this stuff?
quote:
If you're a bammer, you want this dude to be a supporter and not a booster.
And Brooks wasnt saying he was a booster. MErely pointing out that Lee was trying to paint him as a booster without having the sack to call him one. Why would Lee do this? Because, as Brooks pointed out, he's.....Surprise! Surprise! Full of shite!
Posted on 4/7/11 at 9:33 pm to Buck Sweep
quote:
You stupid frick. It mattes not what JLee calls the guy, supporter, fig, whatever. To the NCAA, he's a fricking booster you dick wad.
LOL
Bammer: "See, Jlee was wrong! He's not a supporter, he's a BOOSTER"
Posted on 4/7/11 at 9:33 pm to CFBFAN1121
quote:
In your opinion, why hasn't Peaches denied this very serious allegation?
Silence is preferred to being caught in a lie.
Posted on 4/7/11 at 9:38 pm to Buck Sweep
quote:
You're right. Talking pay for play isn't against the rules. Getting paid is where the shite hits the fan.
Actually, it is. See, if you didnt have the mental capacity of a syphylitic orangutan, you would know I was referring to Daddy Newton. If Cam knew his dad was seeking money (and he either did or he's the most naive laptop thief in the history of the United States) then that would make him inelgible. Don't you remember (bad question, there's no way your brain retains memories longer than a day or so) then the whole reason Cam remained eligible was because they couldnt prove to their satisfaction that Cam knew about the solicitations. Do you REALLY not remember this? (I know, I know, dumb question- you're probably hazy on what you had for breakfast this morning.)
Posted on 4/7/11 at 9:39 pm to Buck Sweep
quote:
You stupid frick. It matters not what JLee calls the guy, supporter, fig, whatever. To the NCAA, he's a fricking booster you dick wad.
Really? There's a very specific ncaa definition on what constitutes a booster. Please post it and show me where that guy meets the criteria. Im waiting.
Posted on 4/7/11 at 9:40 pm to CFBFAN1121
quote:
LOL
Bammer: "See, Jlee was wrong! He's not a supporter, he's a BOOSTER"
Please, same question to you Einstein. Show me the ncaa definition of a booster, and how he meets the qualifications. I'll wait.
Posted on 4/7/11 at 9:41 pm to secfan123
quote:
Actually, it is. See, if you didnt have the mental capacity of a syphylitic orangutan, you would know I was referring to Daddy Newton. If Cam knew his dad was seeking money (and he either did or he's the most naive laptop thief in the history of the United States) then that would make him inelgible. Don't you remember (bad question, there's no way your brain retains memories longer than a day or so) then the whole reason Cam remained eligible was because they couldnt prove to their satisfaction that Cam knew about the solicitations. Do you REALLY not remember this? (I know, I know, dumb question- you're probably hazy on what you had for breakfast this morning.)
No, it's not. Says the Pres of the NCAA, Mark Emmert.
LINK
Read the 5th paragraph.
And no, that wasn't the whole reason.
This post was edited on 4/7/11 at 9:43 pm
Posted on 4/7/11 at 9:47 pm to secfan123
Lee has problem trying to explain how he found out that Peaches asked for the payoff of his mtg if true that info had to come from inside the bank . You can't discuss peoples account status with anyone other then the account holder. Lee just discussed it over the airwaves. If true or not this is a lawsuit if Peaches wanted to sue.
Posted on 4/7/11 at 9:57 pm to Crimson Mafia IIIX
quote:
Lee has problem trying to explain how he found out that Peaches asked for the payoff of his mtg if true that info had to come from inside the bank . You can't discuss peoples account status with anyone other then the account holder. Lee just discussed it over the airwaves. If true or not this is a lawsuit if Peaches wanted to sue.
Armchair lawyers are stupid. If such information was divulged improperly, the reporter has no liability, it's the person that divulged it that has the problem. The only way Lee would have a problem is if he hacked the banks computers to get it.
This post was edited on 4/7/11 at 9:58 pm
Page 6 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News