Started By
Message
re: BREAKING: NCAA will not change ineligible receiver downfield rule
Posted on 3/6/15 at 9:47 pm to Irons Puppet
Posted on 3/6/15 at 9:47 pm to Irons Puppet
quote:
63 was a yard and a half down field, the FB was being grabbed by a Bama LB, everyone else was within a yard of the LOS. 38 was an eligible Receiver on that play, but was not able to finish his route due to the arm around his shoulder pads. Like I said, even Steve Shaw didn't see a penalty on that play. Keep crying.
Holy shite you can't be serious.
Your fullback went downfield looking for a backer to block and threw a shoulder when he arrived.
Your linemen are both easily over 3 yards. I don't feel like doing another screencap. Just pause it at the 1:05 mark and look at their feet.
This post was edited on 3/6/15 at 9:50 pm
1
Posted on 3/6/15 at 9:50 pm to Irons Puppet
Any bias in that opinion, any?
Sticking to the topic, is 8-5 the goal?
Sticking to the topic, is 8-5 the goal?
Posted on 3/6/15 at 9:50 pm to Tuscaloosa
quote:
quote:63 was a yard and a half down field, the FB was being grabbed by a Bama LB, everyone else was within a yard of the LOS. 38 was an eligible Receiver on that play, but was not able to finish his route due to the arm around his shoulder pads. Like I said, even Steve Shaw didn't see a penalty on that play. Keep crying. Holy shite you can't be serious.
All in the eye of the beholder. Show me where the lineman were beyond three yards. The little blue line is the LOS and 38 is not a lineman.
Posted on 3/6/15 at 9:50 pm to AUbagman
Showing videos from season's before last year is kinda lame for us dude. Stick to this year.
Posted on 3/6/15 at 10:00 pm to nc14
SO lil bro.
Posted on 3/6/15 at 10:08 pm to beatbammer
quote:
SO lil bro.
Have you seen your own handle?
Posted on 3/6/15 at 10:25 pm to TTsTowel
Didn't Bama win the iron bowl this year? Why does this matter?
Page 11 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News