0
Started By
Message
re: Bama, it's institutional.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 9:28 pm to olddawg26
Posted on 10/11/26 at 9:28 pm to olddawg26
quote:
The calls against Georgia were probably holds. I think the issue is there were more blatant ones NOT being called on bama, on big plays
I have no problem with that take. I didn’t see them, but I’m sure UgA fans feel they did.
This post was edited on 10/11/26 at 9:40 pm
Posted on 10/11/26 at 9:37 pm to Prettyboy Floyd
quote:
Prettyboy Floyd
Three strikes buddy. You are not worth responding to again.
quote:
Projection would imply that you're not doing exactly what I said you would do yet your fans are doing exactly what I said - in this very thread
Projection doesn’t mean that at all. I’m sorry to have confused you with a concept so far over your head.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 9:42 pm to Crimson K
quote:
Projection doesn’t mean that at all. I’m sorry to have confused you with a concept so far over your head.
What have I defended about Georgia or holds that would lead you to define me saying Bama never admits when they hold - as projection.
If you don't even understand your own use of the English language and use words that have no context or basis in reality- maybe you should stick to whining about refs and leave the big words to actual situations of projecting.
This post was edited on 10/11/26 at 9:44 pm
Posted on 10/11/26 at 9:45 pm to Prettyboy Floyd
quote:
Prettyboy Floyd
Good day to you, sir. I think I have made my position clear on continuing this discussion.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 9:47 pm to Crimson K
quote:
Three strikes buddy. You are not worth responding to again.
Oh no- the delusional bama fan gave me a Turkey. How will I live?
Posted on 10/11/26 at 9:58 pm to olddawg26
quote:
As he’s hooking him and pulling him back. Dude just give it up, most bama posters have already agreed it was a missed hold. Who cares? No need to lose AND look dumb
After all the years of Bama players institutionally getting away with holding, their fans would have caught onto what holding is.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 10:02 pm to 3down10
quote:
He's driving his feet into him the entire time and he's never behind the guy until the end and he's let go. As I said earlier, you normally see it on the edge with speed rushes. They keep moving but they aren't allowed to come inside as the blocker blocks them in the side. You realize your defender is also trying to come inside a bit as well right?
It was blatant holding on a critical play, Kamala.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 10:15 pm to olddawg26
quote:
He’s trying to run past him. He’s getting hooked. Why are you dying on the dumbest hill possible? To make bama look perfect? That’s a hold in every fan bases opinion including most bamas posters. Such a dumb thing to debate
They are always trying to run past them.
The lineman hits the defender at about a 45 degree angle. That means hands to the chest is fine.
The lineman feet are constantly moving and driving to the defender to prevent the defender from getting behind him.
In order for it to be a hook, the lineman has to be behind. And he's not until the end when he lets go.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News