Started By
Message

re: Auburn will not lose more than 4 games

Posted on 8/10/17 at 12:05 am to
Posted by BowlJackson
Birmingham, AL
Member since Sep 2013
52881 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 12:05 am to
quote:

I am just curious with what depth? 1 or 2 injuries on the offensive and defensive line and two quarterbacks that are known to be injury prone. I just don't see it. Auburn problem is they don't have depth. So no if auburn has any injuries in the secondary, d line, o line or quaterback they will be average to below average.


This is easily the most ignorant thing I've read in months
Posted by zacthatassup
Lake Charles
Member since Oct 2016
67 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 4:38 am to
quote:

@ LSwho - W, beat them easily last year when they had Fournette and a good defense. All we have to do is kick field goals.


Did we watch the same game? I wouldn't consider an 18-13 win beating anyone "easily". Especially considering the way that one ended?? Combined, Johnson and Pettway carried 39 times for 154 yards and 0 TD's. White didn't throw a TD either.

- Guice = 62 yards on 3 carries.
- Pettway = 61 yards on 17 carries
(one more rushing attempt the LF7 had)
* Fournette 16 carries for 101 yards*

Etling would have thrown his second TD of the game and beaten you in your own stadium had there been one second left on the clock. With marginal improvement in QB play, LSU would have won by 14+ . Also, despite a very lousy passing game and an incredibly predictable offensive scheme, our running backs still had a significantly better game than yours.
Our defense may not be quite as talented as last year but the drop off is minimal and they will be well coached. Our offense was 3-14 on 3rd down-- they can't be any worse than that this year.

You're going to have to do more than kick field goals to beat LSU in Death Valley, darsh.



This post was edited on 8/10/17 at 5:41 am
Posted by Tigerman97
Member since Jun 2014
10354 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 5:57 am to
quote:

With marginal improvement in QB play, LSU would have won by 14+ .


Same could be said of Auburn's Oline and QB. With marginal improvement in red zone play Auburn wins by 3 TD's. FYI...these arguments are pointless.
Posted by CrimsonBoz
Member since Sep 2014
16996 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 7:27 am to
quote:

quote:
I am just curious with what depth? 1 or 2 injuries on the offensive and defensive line and two quarterbacks that are known to be injury prone. I just don't see it. Auburn problem is they don't have depth. So no if auburn has any injuries in the secondary, d line, o line or quaterback they will be average to below average.


This is easily the most ignorant thing I've read in months


Not really, you don't have depth.
Posted by JamalSanders
On a boat
Member since Jul 2015
12135 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 8:47 am to
We have a legitimate 9 guys deep on the OL and plenty of guys with playing time on the front half of the defense. On top of the best QB depth in conference.
Posted by AU_251
Your dads room
Member since Feb 2013
11559 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 9:35 am to
quote:

rmnldr



this dude is still melting? Man, someone might wanna check on his well being in real life. This is historic for tRant
Posted by BoomNation
wetumpka. alabama
Member since Feb 2015
2099 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 10:48 am to
Another loss to Georgia and Gus is gone if we lose to LSU this year he doesn't even deserve to be on the same bus ride back home it'll be on the same level as losing to John L. and Arkansas
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 7Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter