Started By
Message

re: Auburn Shooting Thread (Updated 6-12) Suspect in Custody

Posted on 6/10/12 at 7:00 pm to
Posted by Monticello
Member since Jul 2010
16197 posts
Posted on 6/10/12 at 7:00 pm to
quote:

Isn't it funny that the only ones who are telling people to calm down and defending the shooter's case are Bama fans?


It's just as bad that you are trying to turn this into a Bama/Auburn fight. I assure you no Bama fan is happy that Auburn football players were killed. But you sure seem to revel in the possibility of finding a way to make this a Bama/Auburn issue.
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54836 posts
Posted on 6/10/12 at 7:01 pm to
quote:

Death penalty in AL is more geared towards if the victim is much younger or much older.

There is a whole list of things that can qualify a murder as capital murder. The one most likely in effect here is the murder of two or more persons in same act/course of conduct. However, the fight and potential for some kind of self defense claim may be enough to allow him to plead out of capital murder or get the charges amended to just murder.
Posted by Bellabama
Omnipotent, Omniscient, Omnipresent
Member since Nov 2009
30878 posts
Posted on 6/10/12 at 7:02 pm to
quote:

If they want to recommend stepping back and letting the justice system do its work, I'm OK with that.


To your point, and in Nbama's defense, which he clearly doesn't need, he does this for a living. He's always fair about such points, and I assume he'd be even if he had the misfortune of representing a Tennessee fan.

Posted by REV-S
near tuscaloosa
Member since Feb 2012
2095 posts
Posted on 6/10/12 at 7:03 pm to
moticello have you no heart at all.
Posted by NBamaAlum
Soul Patrolville
Member since Jan 2009
27604 posts
Posted on 6/10/12 at 7:03 pm to
That quote flew way the frick over your head.

Also, DP is based on age? Who knew? Guess the ARCrP were changed over the weekend.
Posted by auburnu008
I am the bagman
Member since Feb 2010
19507 posts
Posted on 6/10/12 at 7:03 pm to
quote:

It's just as bad that you are trying to turn this into a Bama/Auburn fight. I assure you no Bama fan is happy that Auburn football players were killed. But you sure seem to revel in the possibility of finding a way to make this a Bama/Auburn issue.

I just do not see the logic behind trying to justify or defend someone who just shot 6 people. I do not give a shite if the guys mother was beaten up. It does not justify shooting someone over it. Trying to make a case for someone like that is the farthest thing from my mind.
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54836 posts
Posted on 6/10/12 at 7:04 pm to
quote:

Also, DP is based on age?
Well, it can be, but your point is correct.
Posted by Monticello
Member since Jul 2010
16197 posts
Posted on 6/10/12 at 7:04 pm to
quote:

The only person I have a problem with in the latter part of this thread is the guy who has tried to make the case that Auburn football players were involved in the fight even though ZERO sources have stated or even rumored that (even the source he sites never said such a thing, its just that his reading comprehension is so poor that seems to be what he though it said).


Here is the direct quote from the Montgomery Advertiser from an eye-witness that has since been taken down:

quote:

• The party was held at the pool, but was moved into the adjacent clubhouse because of rain. • He saw approximately 7 Auburn football players at the event — along with a few of their close friends. • He said the incident began when an unidentified football player made comments about the alleged gunman’s date for the party. The unidentified player didn’t back down when asked to do so. • The gunman was hit over the head with a pair of bottles.


There is a big gap in this report between where the Auburn player refuses to back down and where the gunnman is hit with a bottle. That gap is where the answers to all this will be found.
Posted by beatbammer
Member since Sep 2010
38718 posts
Posted on 6/10/12 at 7:05 pm to
quote:

To your point, and in Nbama's defense, which he clearly doesn't need, he does this for a living. He's always fair about such points, and I assume he'd be even if he had the misfortune of representing a Tennessee fan.


I didn't have a single problem with what NBamaAlum said. He's likely spot-on about this. No problem at all.

The only person I've had a problem with in the latter part of this thread is Monticello who seems to have concocted some goof theory, not substantiated so far in fact and not even rumored, that Auburn football players started the fight and hit the guy in the head with a bottle.

I suspect a flaw in his deductive reasoning. And, unlike you and NBama, I think there's a reason for that flaw when it comes to him.
Posted by Monticello
Member since Jul 2010
16197 posts
Posted on 6/10/12 at 7:06 pm to
quote:

moticello have you no heart at all.


Where on earth do you get this from? This is a tragic story and no one deserved to die that day. This gunman made a really stupid decision to bring a gun to a party and to fire into a crowd.
Posted by auburnu008
I am the bagman
Member since Feb 2010
19507 posts
Posted on 6/10/12 at 7:06 pm to
quote:

Monticello

I think you need to sign up to be the shooter's (ALLEGEDLY OF COURSE!) attorney.
Posted by beatbammer
Member since Sep 2010
38718 posts
Posted on 6/10/12 at 7:07 pm to
quote:

There is a big gap in this report between where the Auburn player refuses to back down and where the gunnman is hit with a bottle.



Exactly.

That didn't stop you from conveniently filling that gap with "Auburn player hit the shooter in the head with a bottle" though, did it?
Posted by CtotheVrzrbck
WeWaCo
Member since Dec 2007
37538 posts
Posted on 6/10/12 at 7:07 pm to
quote:

The NYT's Pete Thamel and Michael Schwirtz are catching a lot of flack over this article about the shooting.


Guess I don't get why the article is so inflammatory. The other stuff did happen and there's not a direct link to robbery and the point shaving, it does allude that there is a big problem down there. I'm surprised Cam Newton, Lowder, and Macgregor werent' mentioned too.
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54836 posts
Posted on 6/10/12 at 7:08 pm to
quote:

REV-S

Emotionally charged threads like this make it harder to decipher noob trolls from simple noobs, but I am getting a bit of a troll vibe. I hope to God I am misunderstanding and you wouldn't troll this thread.
Posted by Monticello
Member since Jul 2010
16197 posts
Posted on 6/10/12 at 7:09 pm to
quote:

I suspect a flaw in his deductive reasoning. And, unlike you and NBama, I think there's a reason for that flaw when it comes to him.


So I am an evil Bama fan who hates Auburn so much that I wish literal death upon its players? And this is coming from the guy whose name is "beatbammer" If anyone is having trouble taking football out of this story it is you.
Posted by beatbammer
Member since Sep 2010
38718 posts
Posted on 6/10/12 at 7:10 pm to
quote:

So I am an evil Bama fan who hates Auburn so much that I wish literal death upon its players?


You do have a faulty link in your deductive reasoning, don't you? This is the second time in the last four pages you have taken a leap of faith and been wrong.

You gonna try for three?
Posted by Monticello
Member since Jul 2010
16197 posts
Posted on 6/10/12 at 7:11 pm to
quote:

Exactly.

That didn't stop you from conveniently filling that gap with "Auburn player hit the shooter in the head with a bottle" though, did it?





I never filled that gap at all. I said that getting hit by a bottle, in court, will matter a lot, regardless of who hit him, whether it was an Auburn player or not. As even the Auburn attorney in this thread has stated, just the fact that there was a fight will probably keep this from being a death penalty case. I never once said as an affirmative fact that an Auburn player hit him with a bottle.
Posted by Monticello
Member since Jul 2010
16197 posts
Posted on 6/10/12 at 7:12 pm to
quote:

Guess I don't get why the article is so inflammatory. The other stuff did happen and there's not a direct link to robbery and the point shaving, it does allude that there is a big problem down there. I'm surprised Cam Newton, Lowder, and Macgregor werent' mentioned too.


Duck.

There was no reason to talk about any of the point shaving or robbery stuff.
Posted by MrPlanters
Member since Jan 2012
822 posts
Posted on 6/10/12 at 7:13 pm to
Monticello you are a freaking idiot, rot in hell
Posted by jso0003
Member since Jun 2009
5170 posts
Posted on 6/10/12 at 7:14 pm to
quote:

Also, DP is based on age? Who knew? Guess the ARCrP were changed over the weekend.


I was referring to the age of the victim

quote:

(15) Murder when the victim is less than 14 years of age.


LINK
This post was edited on 6/10/12 at 7:15 pm
Jump to page
Page First 36 37 38 39 40 ... 167
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 38 of 167Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter