Started By
Message
re: Auburn has the best team in the SEC
Posted on 3/24/17 at 8:36 pm to nc14
Posted on 3/24/17 at 8:36 pm to nc14
quote:
Uh, no,but hope reigns enternal right? Going conference case now? I can cover white boy, dig your spike in and pivot, quick remedial tiger.
no i'm just confused why a person in Cali is posting on this forum. i live amongst SEC school fans.
i guess i don't really want to argue with a UCLA fan over Clemson vs SEC. lol
This post was edited on 3/24/17 at 8:37 pm
2
Posted on 3/24/17 at 8:37 pm to Tillman
Louisiana or Alabama?
Posted on 3/24/17 at 8:42 pm to Tillman
quote:
Clemson's certainly not going to win it all or be in playoffs every season, just like every other program.
uhh, there is in fact one program that has been in the playoffs every year.
And before you try to spin away from it, your comment was "win it all or be in the playoffs every year.
Posted on 3/24/17 at 8:44 pm to Tillman
quote:
no i'm just confused why a person in Cali is posting on this forum.
Irony is ironical.
Posted on 3/24/17 at 8:44 pm to Huddie Leadbetter
that's only due to SEC being historically down as a conference tho.
Posted on 3/24/17 at 8:45 pm to Huddie Leadbetter
quote:
Irony is ironical.
i'm actually discussing my program tho, he's not discussing UCLA. and obviously UCLA not playing SEC teams as much. lol
he's whiteknighting for various SEC teams against a Clemson fan. lol pretty weird.
This post was edited on 3/24/17 at 8:47 pm
Posted on 3/24/17 at 8:46 pm to Tillman
quote:
that's only due to SEC being historically down as a conference tho.
Oh yeah. That's also why Alabama has won 4 national titles in 8 years. Well, except for the fact the opposition in those games didn't play in the SEC.
Posted on 3/24/17 at 8:47 pm to Huddie Leadbetter
you won 4 national ti tles b/c it was easy to get there, although 1 of them they shouldn't have been let in.
if bama is basically an automatic bid out of the SEC every year, you can't say it is a competitve conference right now.
if bama is basically an automatic bid out of the SEC every year, you can't say it is a competitve conference right now.
This post was edited on 3/24/17 at 8:49 pm
Posted on 3/24/17 at 8:49 pm to Tillman
quote:
you won 4 national ti tles b/c it was easy to get there, although 1 of them they shouldn't have been let in.
Oh but you just said back on another page that winning national titles is a program accomplishment, and not due to the lack of strength of the conference you play in.
gooney goo goo
Posted on 3/24/17 at 8:50 pm to Huddie Leadbetter
quote:
Oh but you just said back on another page that winning national titles is a program accomplishment, and not due to the lack of strength of the conference you play in.
gooney goo goo
that's right, nothing i said contradicts that.
you the one who keeps making it about conference. my point has always been the best team may play in a weaker conference.
This post was edited on 3/24/17 at 8:51 pm
Posted on 3/24/17 at 8:53 pm to Tillman
I don't keep making it about conference. You said every other team (though you meant "no other team") has made the playoffs every year, and I reminded you that one team has.
Posted on 3/24/17 at 9:00 pm to Huddie Leadbetter
my point was in general no team makes the playoffs or wins the natty every year.
this is in response to the premise that Clemson must basically win it all every year or it is a 'flash in the pan', etc. there are a lot of programs competing in football.
u'll see posts on here depicting Clemson as a loser program if it has 3 or 4 losses next year, even 2.
this is in response to the premise that Clemson must basically win it all every year or it is a 'flash in the pan', etc. there are a lot of programs competing in football.
u'll see posts on here depicting Clemson as a loser program if it has 3 or 4 losses next year, even 2.
This post was edited on 3/24/17 at 9:02 pm
Posted on 3/24/17 at 9:40 pm to Tillman
quote:
Clemson has 6 straight seasons of 10 wins or more homey since Boyd's first season.
They're in the shifty ACC. There is a reason why the term "clemsoning" existed for a long damn time... lol
Posted on 3/24/17 at 10:01 pm to Tillman
quote:
u'll see posts on here depicting Clemson as a loser program if it has 3 or 4 losses next year, even 2.
Other than the last handful of years, Clemson has been a loser program.
Posted on 3/24/17 at 10:08 pm to jangalang
quote:
hey're in the shifty ACC. There is a reason why the term "clemsoning" existed for a long damn time... lol
ok, you guys have narratives. the clemsoning thing was actually started by gamecocks.
Posted on 3/24/17 at 10:08 pm to jangalang
quote:
ther than the last handful of years, Clemson has been a loser program.
doesn't make much sense given it has the most ACC titles, and a national title in 1981 and was very good in 80s and early 90s.
you don't know much about clemson, u prob a teenager.
auburn has had several losing and mediocrer seasons recently.
This post was edited on 3/24/17 at 10:10 pm
Posted on 3/24/17 at 10:19 pm to Tillman
quote:
doesn't make much sense given it has the most ACC titles, and a national title in 1981 and was very good in 80s and early 90s.
Clemson wasn't "very good" in the 1980's or the 90s. Nobody gives a shite about ACC titles either.
Posted on 3/24/17 at 10:20 pm to Tillman
quote:
ok, you guys have narratives. the clemsoning thing was actually started by gamecocks.
And the narrative fit.
Posted on 3/24/17 at 10:35 pm to jangalang
quote:
Clemson wasn't "very good" in the 1980's or the 90s. Nobody gives a shite about ACC titles either.
fact don't back that up. a top 10 winniest program in the 80s.
correction, you don't care about ACC titles b/c u are a SEC fanboy. lol
your team is not automatically awesome b/c it plays in the SEC as u seem to believe
This post was edited on 3/24/17 at 10:36 pm
Posted on 3/24/17 at 10:36 pm to jangalang
the def. of Clemsoning appears to be simply losing a game. obviously every teams loses sometimes.
Page 8 of 16
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News