Started By
Message
1
Posted on 5/29/13 at 1:53 am to TupeloReb
Is this turd really arguing over a QB with 3-4 years in a coaches system and experience vs a QB with barely 1 year?
Posted on 5/29/13 at 2:07 am to parkjas2001
quote:
Who is Bo wallace?
No, really? Who is he?
Posted on 5/29/13 at 2:18 am to Hubbhogg
quote:
No, really? Who is he?
A below average SEC QB based on the fact he only completed 78.4% of his passes against Arky last season
Posted on 5/29/13 at 2:31 am to TheNorthPlace
Who didn't throw for that against us last year? John Parker Wilson would have thrown for 85% against our d last year.
Posted on 5/29/13 at 3:16 am to hebronhog42
WOW...either somebody loves them some Blo Wallace or got bored. I'm not sure which one.
Posted on 5/29/13 at 3:31 am to hebronhog42
Your backing up my point, thanks man. Hey, if your up get on the Box holmes.
Posted on 5/29/13 at 3:44 am to pankReb
Isnt the SEC ave arround 30 or close to it?!? Great Expectations. Nevermind trying to hang a half dollar on em. Guess he just plans on avoiding blowouts 
Posted on 5/29/13 at 4:04 am to pankReb
quote:
Cause were going to put 30 up on you!!! ??
He doesn't even seem certain of this...
Posted on 5/29/13 at 5:50 am to gnarkill1529
I left this thread, watched House of Cards, and fell asleep. Prepare to be REPLIED TO LIKE A MOTHERfrickER.
"Good" but "middle of the pack," so he's "good" but just average?
Making him, what, the 8th or 9th best quarterback out of a dozen known starters? That's not "good" nor is it "middle of the pack," so stop being a pussy about it and just say that you (erroneously) don't think he's SEC material at all.
quote:
Wallace is good but he is just middle of the pack.
"Good" but "middle of the pack," so he's "good" but just average?
quote:
I would take 7 or 8 other qbs before Wallace
Making him, what, the 8th or 9th best quarterback out of a dozen known starters? That's not "good" nor is it "middle of the pack," so stop being a pussy about it and just say that you (erroneously) don't think he's SEC material at all.
Posted on 5/29/13 at 5:51 am to gnarkill1529
quote:
I think he's top third
I can agree with this
You JUST said he was "middle of the pack" and that you'd take 8 quarterbacks over him.
Posted on 5/29/13 at 5:53 am to gnarkill1529
quote:
ill give you ole miss fans the benefit of the doubt and say he is top 5 going into the season.
But you'd take eight guys over him?
Posted on 5/29/13 at 5:59 am to MaroonNation
quote:
Hate to bring this up but it was powerhouse Tulane that separated that shoulder.
And? What, you don't think CUSA players get injured? Do you think SEC players are somehow magically invincible when playing outside of the SEC?
Injuries can happen against anyone. shite, he could have literally just tripped and separated his own shoulder walking down the goddamned sidewalk. So, really, what the frick does Tulane have to do with this?
quote:
No one will sleep on OM this year like they did last year
How do I know that you're a dumbass? Because you say stuff like this.
quote:
in 2011
You mean when Randall Mackey was our quarterback and Houston Nutt our head coach?
quote:
The trick is to not have any one particular person stand out That's the Mississippi State way.
CLANGA
Posted on 5/29/13 at 6:01 am to gnarkill1529
quote:
play better defense then.
Yes, because football works that way. You just wave a magic fricking wand and will it into being.
The reason our defense was lacking was because our talent on D was lacking. We're working on fixing that, and did a good job with recruiting defensive talent last year.
Posted on 5/29/13 at 6:01 am to PortCityTiger82
OHHHHH NOOOOOOO Bo Wallace is sooo scary on his 6-5 team.
Posted on 5/29/13 at 6:04 am to MSUbulldogs03
quote:
Bo threw for 2,994 yards and had 22 tds to a 17 interceptions.
Literally the ONLY thing about those stats which are below average are the interception numbers. The yards and touchdown numbers were literally ABOVE AVERAGE in that there were more quarterbacks in the SEC with statistically worse numbers than Bo Wallace than there were with statistically better. So he literally was not below average.
And it's cute of you to bolster your point by taking out the rushing yards and touchdowns of a quarterback in a read-option system. As if the eight rushing touchdowns he scored (the most by an OM quarterback since Archie Manning) were somehow not touchdowns.
Posted on 5/29/13 at 6:06 am to MSUbulldogs03
quote:
I would put Russell's STATS in the "average" qb range. (2,800, 24 tds, 10 ints.)
I sure would love to have played Kentucky, Jackson State, and the Montana School for the Amputated last year.
Russell looked like shite against good teams.
Posted on 5/29/13 at 6:09 am to MSUbulldogs03
quote:
If you would go look at my damn post and stop getting so damn butt hurt so easy you would see that I capitalized STATS because those STATS are what I consider an "average" qb.
You can't just arbitrarily decide what is and isn't average, dumbass. There's a definition of "average" in this context, and it's not "whatever the frick MSUpoorperson03 thinks 'average' is."
Posted on 5/29/13 at 6:11 am to MSUbulldogs03
quote:
If we can continue to take 3/4 then I am fine.
Welp, I hate to break it to you, but...
Posted on 5/29/13 at 6:13 am to Requiem For A Dawg
quote:
Toopellow pls.
no is reckweyum
Page 12 of 16
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News