Started By
Message
re: An Oregon fan wants Alabama (to the tune of Sweet Home Alabama)
Posted on 10/9/12 at 4:42 pm to bisonduck
Posted on 10/9/12 at 4:42 pm to bisonduck
quote:
and Bama hasn't either. Have you stopped to think that we've face Nuss several times?
Nuss may be the OC, but it is Saban's Offense. How many times have ya played him?
1
Posted on 10/9/12 at 4:42 pm to bhart99
quote:
Clear evidence that you don't actually stay up to watch Oregon play. They run between the tackles way more than they hit the edge.
Did I say that they didn't?
Posted on 10/9/12 at 4:43 pm to bhart99
quote:
Their defensive team speed certainly helped them slow down Cam Newton like no SEC team could.
First half of the Bama game. Second half was complacency against the best college player of all time. If you think your D has anything on an SEC D....lol
Posted on 10/9/12 at 4:44 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
quote:
How many times have ya played him?
I believe two times. Can't remember when Nuss arrived.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 4:45 pm to bisonduck
We don't run Sarkisian's offense.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 4:47 pm to TideSatchel
quote:
We don't run Sarkisian's offense.
I know.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 4:48 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
quote:
Yeah, we still win. Maybe by even more points. We spent the entire time game planning for everything McCoy did.
dont care who you are......that's funny!!!
Posted on 10/9/12 at 4:48 pm to bhart99
quote:
dont care who you are......that's funny!!!
I agree.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 4:48 pm to bhart99
quote:
dont care who you are......that's funny!!!
yeah, no shite. Advantage to Texas I guess when the #1 qb goes down.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 4:49 pm to bisonduck
quote:
believe two times. Can't remember when Nuss arrived.
Saban...
Posted on 10/9/12 at 4:49 pm to bisonduck
Then what does how many times you played Washington have to do with anything? 
And no one is in here talking about how "Alabama's offense is different this year." You guys are in here pounding your chest about all this progress you've made and how it's different this time, when you have no idea if that's true, because every defense you've played sucks a big fat dick. That's the point.
And no one is in here talking about how "Alabama's offense is different this year." You guys are in here pounding your chest about all this progress you've made and how it's different this time, when you have no idea if that's true, because every defense you've played sucks a big fat dick. That's the point.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 4:49 pm to jatebe
quote:
The uniforms they are so awesome,
I call them the butthole helmets. Looks like someone bending over spreading their cheeks.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 4:50 pm to jatebe
quote:
The SEC does not bother us,
So is that why they've lost their two biggest games against the SEC?
Posted on 10/9/12 at 4:51 pm to Gladius Veritas
Things are different now! Didn't you see the way they ran it up on Washington State?!?
Posted on 10/9/12 at 4:53 pm to bisonduck
quote:
yeah, no shite. Advantage to Texas I guess when the #1 qb goes down.
Imagine if you prepared for over a month for a team to run the option on you, and then they come out and run an air raid. (Not what Texas did, just an example)
Do you think you'd have the same success against that Air Raid as you would against that option?
Posted on 10/9/12 at 4:54 pm to TideSatchel
quote:
And no one is in here talking about how "Alabama's offense is different this year." You guys are in here pounding your chest about all this progress you've made and how it's different this time, when you have no idea if that's true, because every defense you've played sucks a big fat dick. That's the point.
I agree with you. We have to see this line go up against a physical dline. However, Oregon is much more physical in the lines this year. That I can see.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 4:56 pm to bisonduck
Fair enough. I actually agree with that too. I actually like Oregon.
I was more responding to the sentiment in this thread that Oregon "doesn't care about the SEC" and "wants Bama." I guess I viewed your "more phyiscal" comments in that context. You may very wellbeat Alabama; you will not be more physical than Alabama. I'll bet the farm on that. Careful what you wish for...
I was more responding to the sentiment in this thread that Oregon "doesn't care about the SEC" and "wants Bama." I guess I viewed your "more phyiscal" comments in that context. You may very wellbeat Alabama; you will not be more physical than Alabama. I'll bet the farm on that. Careful what you wish for...
Posted on 10/9/12 at 4:56 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
quote:
First half of the Bama game. Second half was complacency against the best college player of all time. If you think your D has anything on an SEC D....lol
An "SEC D" Who exactly is that?
Arkansas who gives up 35 pts a game?
Kentucky who gives up 30 pts a game?
Tenn who gives up 30 pts a game?
Ole miss who gives up 27 pts a game?
UGA, Auburn, Missouri, and Vandy whos in the mid 20's
Seriously you really only have 4 defenses who can really claim to be good... LSU, SC, Bama, and UF. And the reason those teams have gaudy stats is because the conference is full of offensive mediocrity.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 4:59 pm to Gladius Veritas
quote:
So is that why they've lost their two biggest games against the SEC?
Id say the Rose bowl loss against OSU a couple of years ago was bigger than the opener last season.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 5:00 pm to bhart99
quote:
conference is full of offensive mediocrity.
:rotflmao: Wow...you really don't know shite, do you?
Bama, LSU, UF, and UGA. They may not just be good Ds, they're probably 5 of the top 10 Defenses in the country. Think the SEC is full of offensive mediocrity?
Lattimore
Hamilton
Johnny Football
Driskell
Gilly
Hunter
Patterson
Bray
McCarron
Yeldon
Lacy
Hilliard
Perkins
Lutz
Blake
Wallace
Stacy
Gurshall
Murray
Reed
Burton
The list goes on and on and on and on and on. I didn't even name all of the talented OL in the conference.
Page 3 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News