Started By
Message
Posted on 3/11/19 at 8:02 pm to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
Hey now I showed a Big 2 ranking too.
I know. I was just saying.
Posted on 3/11/19 at 8:05 pm to Prof
LOLOL you my man Prof
I'm gonna come up with some football stuff. STAY TUNED.
I'm gonna come up with some football stuff. STAY TUNED.
Posted on 3/11/19 at 8:06 pm to SummerOfGeorge
I look forward to it brother. I'll probably still be a nitpicker tho.

Posted on 3/11/19 at 8:12 pm to SummerOfGeorge
Solid info Summer of George. Good work and accurate 
Posted on 3/11/19 at 8:29 pm to SummerOfGeorge
Basketball and Baseball should be weighted more, since it is determined by the "on the field" performances. Football has always been a beauty contest.
Posted on 3/11/19 at 8:45 pm to Irons Puppet
quote:
Basketball and Baseball should be weighted more, since it is determined by the "on the field" performances. Football has always been a beauty contest.
Or you could just do it by records in games vs other SEC teams. Seems pretty on the field performancish to me.
Posted on 3/11/19 at 8:50 pm to SummerOfGeorge
Put the scores next to the teams so we can see how close they are to the team above them. 
This post was edited on 3/11/19 at 9:13 pm
Posted on 3/11/19 at 8:58 pm to ZeusStamos
quote:
ZeusStamos
Quit bitching and make your own list.
Posted on 3/11/19 at 9:00 pm to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
Why? Because it hurts Georgia? Making the tournament is a widely agreed upon general sign of low level success in a season. It would be dumb as hell to ignore that.
I agree
Posted on 3/11/19 at 9:05 pm to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
BIG 3 AVERAGE SEC RANK
T1. Florida
T1. LSU
3. Arkansas
Posted on 3/11/19 at 9:20 pm to hawgfaninc
Updated with totals for each sport and with a new ranking system for football.
Posted on 3/11/19 at 9:21 pm to SummerOfGeorge
That's some strong arse research, as usual

Posted on 3/11/19 at 9:22 pm to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
Coming up brahs
Muh man!
Posted on 3/11/19 at 9:22 pm to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
Or you could just do it by records in games vs other SEC teams. Seems pretty on the field performancish to me.
You used: Football All-time AP Rankings
With the Bowl tie-ins, the final rankings many times had a boost by playing subpar teams from weaker Conferences. Many times SEC teams were matched up against teams from the ACC, Big 10 or non-P5 teams. Teams final records and rankings depended more on TV matchups vs quality of the opponent. Again, a beauty contest.
Posted on 3/11/19 at 9:22 pm to SummerOfGeorge
I used CFB Warehouse Recognized Titles because most seem to think it is a pretty good list and it covers titles back to the 1900s that everyone fights over but doesn't just give it to whoever "claims it". It also picks some that may be AP and gives it to others (Arkansas/Bama in 1964 for example).
Their totals
1. Alabama (15)
2. LSU (4)
2. Tennessee (4)
4. Auburn (3)
4. Florida (3)
6. Georgia (2)
6. Ole Miss (2)
6. Texas A&M (2)
9. Arkansas (1)
10-14. Kentucky, State, Missouri, South Carolina, Vandy (0)
Their totals
1. Alabama (15)
2. LSU (4)
2. Tennessee (4)
4. Auburn (3)
4. Florida (3)
6. Georgia (2)
6. Ole Miss (2)
6. Texas A&M (2)
9. Arkansas (1)
10-14. Kentucky, State, Missouri, South Carolina, Vandy (0)
Posted on 3/11/19 at 9:24 pm to SummerOfGeorge
That's funny. Georgia Fans bitched for there to be a change in the point system and Florida fans get screwed. 
This post was edited on 3/11/19 at 9:27 pm
Popular
Back to top



1






