Started By
Message
1
Posted on 4/9/11 at 11:32 pm to NBamaAlum
This is great.
I expect Auburn to clear itself of all allegations made by the HBO 4 no later than Monday.
I expect Auburn to clear itself of all allegations made by the HBO 4 no later than Monday.
Posted on 4/9/11 at 11:34 pm to Buck Sweep
quote:
This is great.
I expect Auburn to clear itself of all allegations made by the HBO 4 no later than Monday.
So....U Mad?
Posted on 4/9/11 at 11:36 pm to Buck Sweep
2+2 =/= 5
Posted on 4/9/11 at 11:37 pm to NBamaAlum
Posted on 4/9/11 at 11:37 pm to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
2+2 =/= 5
bullshite.
4 former AU players saying that they were paid is exactly the same as a AU Rivals writer saying that a UA player was involved in pay for signing.
Posted on 4/9/11 at 11:38 pm to NBamaAlum
quote:
So....U Mad?
So, you an internet goober?
No shite. It sets a great precedence for all to follow. Just announce no violations found regarding allegations of money changing hands. Frankly, I'm sad Auburn didn't come up with that the day after the HBO 4 aired.
Posted on 4/9/11 at 11:38 pm to AMM AU9893
Posted on 4/9/11 at 11:41 pm to Buck Sweep
quote:
Frankly, I'm mad Auburn didn't come up with that the day after the HBO 4 aired.
fify
Posted on 4/9/11 at 11:42 pm to NBamaAlum
This is what someone just posted on AE about Bama clearing themselves:
quote:
Boy are THEY really going to look like idiots and cheaters when J. Lee unveils all of his proof that the violations did occur.
Posted on 4/9/11 at 11:43 pm to NBamaAlum
quote:
NBamaAlum
Throw in a 'butthurt' and you'll be graduated to "internet dickwad 1st degree".
Posted on 4/9/11 at 11:48 pm to NBamaAlum
quote:
4 former AU players saying that they were paid is exactly the same as a AU Rivals writer saying that a UA player was involved in pay for signing.
Classic inability to read and understand. J. Lee made no allegations. He reported that others were making the allegations. The "old 'sources' type reporting".
Bammer clearing itself of allegations of money changing hands is probably funny to bammers...I bet the NCAA takes a different view of it. This screams for them to actually take it seriously.
Posted on 4/9/11 at 11:56 pm to Buck Sweep
Like UA's investigation of allegations in Gadsden that were forwarded to the NCAA as well? You do realize their findings will be forwarded, right?
Posted on 4/10/11 at 12:00 am to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
Like UA's investigation of allegations in Gadsden that were forwarded to the NCAA as well? You do realize their findings will be forwarded, right?
I would love to read a report of the "findings" that were generated in a 48hr investigation of allegations of this nature.
Posted on 4/10/11 at 12:01 am to Buck Sweep
Should they just call it "garbage" and move on?
Posted on 4/10/11 at 12:03 am to Buck Sweep
Posted on 4/10/11 at 12:04 am to ALcapone
quote:
ALcapone
Ah jeez, not another bammer frickwad!
Posted on 4/10/11 at 12:07 am to CapstoneGrad06
"It's pure garbage"
Posted on 4/10/11 at 12:13 am to AMM AU9893
I believe the compliance office states that there was a pre-existing relationship which basically means it doesn't matter what Woodruff did or did not provide to Calloway or Peaches.
Posted on 4/10/11 at 12:13 am to Buck Sweep
quote:
I would love to read a report of the "findings" that were generated in a 48hr investigation of allegations of this nature.
Your buddy Jeff Lee told us in his radio interview and in his little article he posted on the internet everything that Alabama officials should look into. Surely you didn't think it would take that long with the outline he gave them?
Page 5 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News