Started By
Message
re: #3 (2-0)Ole Miss-6 vs #1 (1-1)Texas A&M-3 FINAL
Posted on 6/2/12 at 9:21 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
Posted on 6/2/12 at 9:21 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
WHY THE frick DID HE NOT SAC BUNT?
Posted on 6/2/12 at 9:21 pm to Mr Sausage
If huber had longer sideburns, he would be the shite.
Does your coaching staff have cool hair cuts also?
Does your coaching staff have cool hair cuts also?
Posted on 6/2/12 at 9:22 pm to Mr Sausage
Not expecting any runs this inning.
Posted on 6/2/12 at 9:22 pm to Mr Sausage
Looks like Huber got pissed.
Bianco must have called him a cocksucker.
Bianco must have called him a cocksucker.
Posted on 6/2/12 at 9:22 pm to pankReb
quote:
Looks like Huber got pissed.
Nau is a poor hitter.
Posted on 6/2/12 at 9:24 pm to pankReb
quote:
Posted by pankReb Looks like Huber got pissed. Bianco must have called him a cocksucker.
Yeah he's looking better. I still miss Jake Morgan though.
Posted on 6/2/12 at 9:24 pm to Mr Sausage
Bianco made a good defensive sub for once. 
Posted on 6/2/12 at 9:24 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
We are gonna need a queer arse stuffed animal for tomorrow like ole miss has. Anyone in college station have a stuffed razorback?
Posted on 6/2/12 at 9:24 pm to ArHog
Had Childress made Nau sac bunt, it would be 6-4 now. fricking idiot.
Posted on 6/2/12 at 9:25 pm to Mr Sausage
stfu about our stuffed Lady Bug. 
Posted on 6/2/12 at 9:27 pm to pankReb
Huber got pumped after that one.
Posted on 6/2/12 at 9:27 pm to Mr Sausage
Damn we can't ever do anything easy can we. 
Posted on 6/2/12 at 9:27 pm to Mr Sausage
Once again, giant batting fail by A&M. Should have sac bunted Nau...then Stein gets the RBI.
Seriously...why the hell do you not sac bunt with runners on 1st and 2nd and NO OUTS?!
Seriously...why the hell do you not sac bunt with runners on 1st and 2nd and NO OUTS?!
This post was edited on 6/2/12 at 9:28 pm
Popular
Back to top


0




