Started By
Message

re: 2007 - Someone Please Explain

Posted on 11/27/22 at 5:34 pm to
Posted by MOS0311
Member since Sep 2022
1042 posts
Posted on 11/27/22 at 5:34 pm to
I know you're trolling and frick LSU but bro, LSU was head and shoulders better than Kansas and Ohio State. The computers got it right.
Posted by swinetime
Member since Apr 2013
4371 posts
Posted on 11/27/22 at 5:37 pm to
quote:

Kansas didn’t win its conference or division, weak schedule. They took the teams with the best resumes.


Best resumes = losing to two unranked teams, including the last game on the schedule at home???
Posted by lsusa
Doing Missionary work for LSU
Member since Oct 2005
4508 posts
Posted on 11/27/22 at 6:02 pm to
quote:

In the final BCS standings after the conference championship games in 2007... 11-1 Kansas finished 8th. Shouldn't the ONLY two 1 lose teams in the nation, Ohio State and Kansas, have played for the National Championship??? Please explain why the one lose Power 5 team finished 8th instead of 2nd. Looks to me like 2007 should be an *.


Simple minded thinking that 1-loss automatically better than 2-loss. Yes, it’s a factor, but not the only factor. LSU had the best overall resume of any team in the country in 2007 enter the BCS National Championship game - that includes Ohio State.

As for 2017, Alabama’s “resume” did not justify their selection into the playoff. They (once again) benefitted by a loss that kept them from
playing in their conference championship
Game. Ohio State and Wisconsin were both more deserving. Hell, you can’t put Alabama head to head against Auburn and justify the Gumps getting in.


Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter