Started By
Message
Posted on 1/2/14 at 3:26 pm to inelishaitrust
Bo had a completely different surgery. It was an Expermential surgery, in which his arm may never be the same as it was when he first got to om. He really never had time to fully recover, and taking more hits (got hit one time in the mizz game I believe where he grabbed his shoulder and was clearly in pain). He could have benefitted from a red shirt year really just to recover.
Posted on 1/3/14 at 10:00 am to 478rebel
quote:
Bo had a completely different surgery. It was an Expermential surgery, in which his arm may never be the same as it was when he first got to om.
From what I have read, I wouldn't necessarily qualify his surgery as "experimental." To me, "experimental" would suggest that it had never been performed at all - or at least on very few people. But it first approved in the U.S. in 2011. The surgeon who performed the surgery seemed pretty confident in the procedure. Here is a [link=( https://www.umc.edu/News_and_Publications/Centerview/2013-01-28-00_State-of-the-art_device_helps_Ole_Miss_QB_heal_from_shoulder_separation_surgery.aspx)]link[/link] to an article about it.
Personally, I don't know anything about his shoulder beyond what I have read. I'm open to being educated, if you wouldn't mind elaborating on what makes Bo's shoulder surgery "experimental," and why his shoulder may never fully heal. Is there a problem with the way his collarbone healed, or is it related to some connective tissue?
Posted on 1/3/14 at 10:18 am to dtmb
quote:
From what I have read, I wouldn't necessarily qualify his surgery as "experimental." To me, "experimental" would suggest that it had never been performed at all - or at least on very few people. But it first approved in the U.S. in 2011. The surgeon who performed the surgery seemed pretty confident in the procedure. Here is a link to an article about it.
I would say any new, unconventional surgery is "experimental." I think it takes more than just one singular use of a particular method or even just several hundred uses before the entire medical community decides it is either a good or bad surgery and everyone should start doing it or should never do it again.
It's still experimental because they are waiting to see what the long term effects are across a adequate sample population.
This post was edited on 1/3/14 at 10:20 am
Posted on 1/3/14 at 10:35 am to DrunkenStuporMan
quote:
I would say any new, unconventional surgery is "experimental."
That's a fair statement. It just seems like that the only thing that is unconventional about the surgery is the method used to stabilize the clavicle. I'm not part of the medical community, so the idea that a surgeon would choose to regularly apply a procedure that could be classified as "experimental" is foreign to me. I'm not surprised that surgeons would adopt relatively new methods, because nothing would progress if they didn't. It just seems counterintuitive that such a procedure would be considered experimental when it has been approved for use. I understand your point, though.
Latest Ole Miss News
Popular
Back to top

0





