Started By
Message

re: Sacks... or lack there of

Posted on 10/8/14 at 5:39 pm to
Posted by BalladofBradSowell
Member since Nov 2012
842 posts
Posted on 10/8/14 at 5:39 pm to
Agree with these dudes. We're 3rd in the country with 10 INT's (behind Boise), and we've dropped about 4. We're getting enough pressure with 4 to make the QB make rushed decisions with everyone else in coverage. I'll take INT's over sacks all day.
Posted by Chawboy
Texas
Member since Feb 2013
1013 posts
Posted on 10/8/14 at 5:44 pm to
Keep in mind that Boise State, Vanderbilt & ULL all game planned for our rush by calling mostly short drops and roll outs to buy their quarterbacks more time. None of those had many true drop backs where the quarterback tried to hold the ball for a few seconds. They basically conceded up front that they couldn't protect their QBs.
Posted by Billy Mays
Member since Jan 2009
25743 posts
Posted on 10/9/14 at 2:35 pm to
Saw on Twitter where we only rushed 5 or more players on 6 out of 31 of Bama's designed pass plays.
Posted by Wanderin Reb
Gallifrey
Member since Jun 2013
10738 posts
Posted on 10/9/14 at 2:59 pm to
And Blake was still throwing scared a lot of the time.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter