Started By
Message
re: US shooting Tomahawk Missles in Syria
Posted on 4/7/17 at 12:05 am to BoddaBoom7
Posted on 4/7/17 at 12:05 am to BoddaBoom7
do you deny chemical weapons were used on civilians in Syria?
1
Posted on 4/7/17 at 12:05 am to Tillman
Nope. You gonna answer me?
Posted on 4/7/17 at 12:07 am to BoddaBoom7
ok. so you are saying a UN member country doesn't have the right to blow out chemical weapons in a rogue nation?
Posted on 4/7/17 at 12:09 am to Tillman
Sure. But what if there is another UN member in the area and we kill their troops? Would that not be considered an act of aggression against another UN member?
Posted on 4/7/17 at 12:10 am to BoddaBoom7
why is the other UN member partnering with a country that uses chemical weapons on civilians?
i've asked you this before.
what business does Russia have in Syria?
i've asked you this before.
what business does Russia have in Syria?
This post was edited on 4/7/17 at 12:11 am
Posted on 4/7/17 at 12:15 am to Tillman
Because their leader is allies with Syria and IRAN. And neither Russia or Iran is very fond of the US. Putin has inerests there just like we do with Israel and the Saudis (also a bunch of bad guys).
I just dont don't think the US needs fo stick its nose in the Middle East aain right now. Especially screwing wih Russia's interests there. From all accounts, Assad and the Russians were starting to turn the tide against the rebels. What do we have to gain?
I just dont don't think the US needs fo stick its nose in the Middle East aain right now. Especially screwing wih Russia's interests there. From all accounts, Assad and the Russians were starting to turn the tide against the rebels. What do we have to gain?
Posted on 4/7/17 at 12:16 am to BoddaBoom7
gassing people is one way to turn the tide, for sure. you seem to be supporitive of this, Russia, and Iran's interests.
This post was edited on 4/7/17 at 12:17 am
Posted on 4/7/17 at 12:17 am to Tillman
Yeah it is and that sucks. Why didn't the UN go in and take them away? They are banned right?
Posted on 4/7/17 at 12:18 am to Tillman
quote:
you seem to be supporitive of this, Russia, and Iran's interests.
Like you voted for Hillary?
Posted on 4/7/17 at 12:23 am to Tillman
You do realize the US is aligned with a group of rebels made up of al nusra (offshoot of al qeada) and isis right? And that they were trying to overthrow a sovereign government
Sounds like you are a leftwing kook that supports anarchy.
Sounds like you are a leftwing kook that supports anarchy.
This post was edited on 4/7/17 at 12:25 am
Posted on 4/7/17 at 12:25 am to BoddaBoom7
The US is the enforcer of most UN rules.
and you are complaining about the strike.
lol at Assad is a sovereign government that sprung up from free elections.
you support the normalization of chemical weapons in warfare.
and you are complaining about the strike.
lol at Assad is a sovereign government that sprung up from free elections.
you support the normalization of chemical weapons in warfare.
This post was edited on 4/7/17 at 12:28 am
Posted on 4/7/17 at 12:27 am to Tillman
quote:
The US is the enforcer of most UN rules.
Why?
Posted on 4/7/17 at 12:28 am to BoddaBoom7
because the UN is a weak mostly liberal group of people. you yourself said they are weak.
Posted on 4/7/17 at 12:28 am to Tillman
quote:
lol at Assad is a sovereign government that sprung up from free elections.
Even if thats true why give weapons and support to a bunch of radical muslim rebels?
Posted on 4/7/17 at 12:30 am to Tillman
They are. You're the one spouting their stance on banned weapons and how they enforce punishment on those bans. If they're really banned why do most members still have them?
Throw NATO in there with the UN. Putin has been puttinf his nuts on their chin for years
Throw NATO in there with the UN. Putin has been puttinf his nuts on their chin for years
This post was edited on 4/7/17 at 12:33 am
Posted on 4/7/17 at 12:33 am to BoddaBoom7
quote:
Even if thats true why give weapons and support to a bunch of radical muslim rebels?
all the strikes did was destroy a weapons stronghold.
Posted on 4/7/17 at 12:34 am to BoddaBoom7
you just making some dumb arguments. most countries are not using chemical weapons on their own people.
Posted on 4/7/17 at 12:35 am to Tillman
That has nothing to do with what you quoted.
And maybe killed troops of another UN member.
quote:
all the strikes did was destroy a weapons stronghold.
And maybe killed troops of another UN member.
Posted on 4/7/17 at 12:36 am to Tillman
quote:
most countries are not using chemical weapons on their own people.
Where did I say they did?
Posted on 4/7/17 at 12:38 am to BoddaBoom7
sounds like you are making excuses for Russia to me.
if they were at this chemical weapons depot, why are you concerned about them being killed?
if they were at this chemical weapons depot, why are you concerned about them being killed?
This post was edited on 4/7/17 at 12:39 am
Page 8 of 11
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News