Started By
Message
re: 9/11 Was A Conspiracy!
Posted on 6/27/14 at 7:27 pm to TbirdSpur2010
Posted on 6/27/14 at 7:27 pm to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
Oh, but you have, old sport
Okay, you're free to link.
1
Posted on 6/27/14 at 7:27 pm to Sleeping Tiger
You're free to read the dang thread.
Posted on 6/27/14 at 7:28 pm to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
Says insane things.
Calls others immature for calling him insane.
Is this real life?
I wonder if he'll address his posts regarding planes hitting buildings being irrelevant in conversations where planes hit buildings.
Posted on 6/27/14 at 7:29 pm to StrawsDrawnAtRandom
quote:
wonder if he'll address his posts regarding planes hitting buildings being irrelevant in conversations where planes hit buildings
What? He said nothing of the kind. You're wrong :)
Posted on 6/27/14 at 7:31 pm to StrawsDrawnAtRandom
quote:
I wonder if he'll address his posts regarding planes hitting buildings being irrelevant in conversations where planes hit buildings.
What are you talking about?
When Vols was being this obtuse earlier I knew he was doing it deliberately and he admitted it.
I'm not so sure in this case.
I said - this isn't really relevant (obviously because there are differing factors) but planes have hit skyscrapers resulting in no collapse.
I'm not sure how this has tickled your fancy so much.
Posted on 6/27/14 at 7:31 pm to TbirdSpur2010
Kinda like Pete Carroll's views are legitimate and add value, but aren't relevant.
Posted on 6/27/14 at 7:32 pm to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
You're wrong :)
If anything can be said about this thread it's that I didn't behave this way, but proceed with doin your thing.
Posted on 6/27/14 at 7:33 pm to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
What? He said nothing of the kind. You're wrong :)
I didn't even get that.
And that's another tactic of his. If he says something wrong, or the conversation shifts he suddenly ignores it, the tunnel vision takes over and he takes the Misericordia route.
Posted on 6/27/14 at 7:35 pm to UMTigerRebel
quote:
Kinda like Pete Carroll's views are legitimate and add value, but aren't relevant.
You do know Vols understood what was being said, he was just being an arse for the fun of it.
If you can't see the noteworthiness in a guy like Pete Carroll being in the conspiracy camp as a way to counter the 'tin foil in moms basement' stereotype while also recognizing that what Pete thinks can't be used in a significant way in the actual debate, then I don't know what to tell you.
This post was edited on 6/27/14 at 7:36 pm
Posted on 6/27/14 at 7:35 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
If anything can be said about this thread it's that I didn't behave this way
Actually anyone who has read any of this thread would conclude exactly the opposite of that
Posted on 6/27/14 at 7:36 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
What are you talking about?
This isn't entirely relevant because there were different factors in play, but a B25 bomber hit the Empire State building and a C45 hit 40 Wall Street, neither building collapsed. - Sleeping Tiger
This is called having your cake and eating it too.
It's called trying to slither your argument in.
Didn't ya papi ever tell you that you can't have it both ways?
Posted on 6/27/14 at 7:37 pm to StrawsDrawnAtRandom
quote:
If he says something wrong, or the conversation shifts he suddenly ignores it, the tunnel vision takes over and he takes the Misericordia route.
He also skipped the whole part about how I shouldn't be posting from work because I'm paid by tax dollars.
Just drops little nuggets of lunacy around threads like the Easter Bunny hiding eggs
Posted on 6/27/14 at 7:39 pm to StrawsDrawnAtRandom
quote:
This isn't entirely relevant because there were different factors in play, but a B25 bomber hit the Empire State building and a C45 hit 40 Wall Street, neither building collapsed. - Sleeping Tiger
This is called having your cake and eating it too.
It's called trying to slither your argument in.
Didn't ya papi ever tell you that you can't have it both ways?
I guess so, man.
I was having my cake and eating it too.
Or I was just injecting into the pool of discussion that planes have hit buildings resulting in no collapse, while also recognizing that the differing factors involved make it impossible to totally apply those examples to this case.
Posted on 6/27/14 at 7:40 pm to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
He also skipped the whole part about how I shouldn't be posting from work because I'm paid by tax dollars.
I'm not sure what you're talking about, what did I ignore?
And, I've said a number of things that get ignored, just in the last couple pages I've made points that get totally passed over.
Posted on 6/27/14 at 7:42 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
I was just injecting into the pool of discussion that planes have hit buildings resulting in no collapse, while also recognizing that the differing factors involved make it impossible to totally apply those examples to this case.
That was stupid of you.
If you can't apply the examples to the matter at hand, they cease to be examples.
You're just babbling at that point.
Posted on 6/27/14 at 7:43 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
Or I was just injecting into the pool of discussion that planes have hit buildings resulting in no collapse, while also recognizing that the differing factors involved make it impossible to totally apply those examples to this case.
Let me fix this for you.
quote:
Or I was just injecting into the pool of discussion that planes have hit buildings resulting in no collapse, while arguing that the Twin Towers didn't fall down due to planes.
This is extremely relevant and you fricking know it, especially to this conversation. There is no way to snake out of this one.
Wriggle as you may, you literally said planes hitting buildings and them not falling is impertinent to a conversation where you were arguing just that.
Unbelievable blindness.
Posted on 6/27/14 at 7:44 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
not sure what you're talking about
Per par for you.
quote:
what did I ignore?
You literally just quoted it.
quote:
just in the last couple pages I've made points
Because they were idiotic.
A diarrhea of idiocy flows from your fingers.
Please continue
Posted on 6/27/14 at 7:45 pm to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
not sure what you're talking about
Should seriously be your signature, ST.
Posted on 6/27/14 at 7:48 pm to StrawsDrawnAtRandom
That last post was bad, even for this site.
What are you even talking about?
I clearly said I realize this isn't entirely relevant because of differing factors, but planes have hit buildings resulting in no collapse.
I'm not trying to wiggle out of anything, because there is nothing to wiggle out of.
How do you interpret that I'm saying the towers didn't fall because of planes?
And then this, no idea what to even say besides -- 'whaaat'?
You're going to have to reel it back in for this conversation to continue.
What are you even talking about?
I clearly said I realize this isn't entirely relevant because of differing factors, but planes have hit buildings resulting in no collapse.
I'm not trying to wiggle out of anything, because there is nothing to wiggle out of.
How do you interpret that I'm saying the towers didn't fall because of planes?
quote:
you literally said planes hitting buildings and them not falling is impertinent to a conversation where you were arguing just that.
And then this, no idea what to even say besides -- 'whaaat'?
You're going to have to reel it back in for this conversation to continue.
Posted on 6/27/14 at 7:50 pm to Sleeping Tiger
In my experience, if something adds value, it's usually relevant to the topic at hand.
Page 28 of 48
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News