Started By
Message
Posted on 10/14/13 at 2:19 pm to Tds & Beer
we do this every year. we play like absolute shite against a shitty team and barely win.
we aren't losing to kentucky.
we aren't losing to kentucky.
Posted on 10/14/13 at 2:21 pm to Tds & Beer
quote:
no there's no point in answering your stupid posts
No, You can't answer because he has not produced. That's why.
You can't answer because they are stopping him because he does not pass the ball well.
You know as well as I do, the SEC is only going to continue that pattern. You just won't admit it.
Posted on 10/14/13 at 2:24 pm to darkhorse
quote:
You can't answer because they are stopping him because he does not pass the ball well.
Dak was 7/10 Saturday night
His 2 2nd half drives were a missed FG and then Mullen not kicking a FG for some stupid reason from the 8 yr line.
BG didnt stop him- we just cant kick. The only thing BG stopped Saturday night in the 2nd half was Russell- who went 3 and out on 3 passes because he is one-dimensional
Posted on 10/14/13 at 2:34 pm to CoonassBulldog
quote:
Dak was 7/10 Saturday night
His 2 2nd half drives were a missed FG and then Mullen not kicking a FG for some stupid reason from the 8 yr line.
BG didnt stop him- we just cant kick. The only thing BG stopped Saturday night in the 2nd half was Russell- who went 3 and out on 3 passes because he is one-dimensional
He had a whopping 32 yards rushing in the second half! Now, Are you about to tell me that BG is up there with the SEC defenses we are about to face? BG is made up of mainly 2 star players. DAK with that HIGH PERCENTAGE against BG, TROY, and the MIGHTY ALCORN WORLD BEATERS is still only 54%. Remove those chump arse teams and he is below 50%
Are you trying to ARGUE AGAIN that his passing numbers verses a ALCORN and TROY type team is comparable to the SEC or ranked teams?
So again. Please answer the questions or I will get the picture that you just don't want to admit that you are wrong.
Posted on 10/14/13 at 2:43 pm to darkhorse
quote:
No, You can't answer because he has not produced. That's why.
I won't answer you because you will just ignore my logic. Plus coonass is pushing your shite in without my help.
Posted on 10/14/13 at 3:11 pm to darkhorse
He's not going to throw for a high percentage...but he will still complete some big passes.
What he gives us in the run game > 10% lower pass completion rate
What he gives us in the run game > 10% lower pass completion rate
Posted on 10/14/13 at 3:31 pm to darkhorse
DH, you cannot find one analysts or fan from another team that thinks that Russell gives us our best chance to win.
We get your point. Prescott could do better with pass completion percentage, but even with what he is doing, he is better than Russell. When he starts passing better, he is going to be unstoppable.
Prescott puts up good offensive totals now. He is only going to get better.
We get your point. Prescott could do better with pass completion percentage, but even with what he is doing, he is better than Russell. When he starts passing better, he is going to be unstoppable.
Prescott puts up good offensive totals now. He is only going to get better.
Posted on 10/14/13 at 3:32 pm to jumbo
quote:
we do this every year. we play like absolute shite against a shitty team and barely win.
we aren't losing to kentucky.
Been saying this since Saturday night.
Thank god finally someone agrees.
Posted on 10/14/13 at 3:35 pm to darkhorse
Why the frick are you so hung up on completion percentage?
I believe Coonass stated earlier that in one of Russell's drives he was 2/3 passing and went 3 and out. What does that tell you about your beloved completion percentage?
I believe Coonass stated earlier that in one of Russell's drives he was 2/3 passing and went 3 and out. What does that tell you about your beloved completion percentage?
Posted on 10/14/13 at 4:09 pm to DynastyDawg
Ignorance is bliss...
If you think it doesn't matter then there is no need in having this conversation because it explains why you think that 47% is just fine!
If you think it doesn't matter then there is no need in having this conversation because it explains why you think that 47% is just fine!
Posted on 10/14/13 at 4:12 pm to CoonassBulldog
Then please explain why he is not producing in the second half.
Again, you won't answer the questions because you are a typical fan who calls for the back up no matter what is right in front of your face.
Again, you won't answer the questions because you are a typical fan who calls for the back up no matter what is right in front of your face.
Posted on 10/14/13 at 4:24 pm to DynastyDawg
quote:
we do this every year. we play like absolute shite against a shitty team and barely win.
we aren't losing to kentucky.
Been saying this since Saturday night.
Thank god finally someone agrees
I agree too, but I'm still disappointed in our performance and am rightfully pissed. I mean we should have beaten Auburn, but we also should have lost to BG.
Posted on 10/14/13 at 4:29 pm to darkhorse
quote:
Then please explain why he is not producing in the second half.
A) He only had 2 drives in the 2nd half. TWO. Dos
B) Bell missed the FG on one and Mullen didnt kick the FG on the 2nd one.
Dakota was 5-7 passing for 65 yards in the 2nd half. That's 71.4% for those scoring at home- and we still didnt produce points. Has it donned on you yet that completion percentage is not nearly as important as you make it out to be?
This post was edited on 10/14/13 at 4:30 pm
Posted on 10/14/13 at 5:27 pm to CoonassBulldog
quote:
A) He only had 2 drives in the 2nd half. TWO. Dos
No, he had 3 in the Bowling Green game. He did not produce but 22 yards in the 4th quarter on 6 attempts at rushing.
Now answer that for the rest of the games he has been in. After all that was the question.
quote:
Then please explain why he is not producing in the second half.
quote:
Dakota was 5-7
No... He threw it 8 times completed 5 against the mighty super duper bowling green of kentucky.
Now again, the question was how is he being productive in the 2nd half?
You have yet to answer because you can't really find a way to twist the facts.
quote:
Has it donned on you yet that completion percentage is not nearly as important as you make it out to be?
Well I'm sure it's not important to some because they keep insisting that completing 47% is friggin Cam newtonish and Manziel like.
So back to the questions that you can't seem to answer...
This post was edited on 10/14/13 at 5:28 pm
Posted on 10/15/13 at 8:26 am to darkhorse
quote:
the mighty super duper bowling green of kentucky
WTF? Kentucky?
Posted on 10/15/13 at 9:00 am to Allyn McKeen
Don't stop him. He's on a roll.
Posted on 10/15/13 at 9:03 am to Allyn McKeen
Maybe because Bowling Green is in Kentucky?
This post was edited on 10/15/13 at 9:04 am
Posted on 10/15/13 at 9:12 am to DynastyDawg
quote:
Maybe because Bowling Green is in Kentucky?
Yes, KY has a city called Bowling Green. OH does as well. The difference is that the OH city also has a university called Bowling Green.
... and FWIW, the Washington Huskies do not play in DC.
Popular
Back to top



2



