Started By
Message

re: Board Opinion Vote: Starting QB and RB Dak-15 TR -2

Posted on 9/18/13 at 9:54 am to
Posted by dawgM2
MS
Member since Jan 2013
4265 posts
Posted on 9/18/13 at 9:54 am to
I say we change QB's and RB's every offensive play
Posted by McRebel42
North Mississippi Hollywood
Member since Oct 2012
11606 posts
Posted on 9/18/13 at 10:15 am to
BOOM!
Posted by Allyn McKeen
Key West, FL
Member since Jun 2012
4699 posts
Posted on 9/18/13 at 10:20 am to
I actually like our 2 back set. I would love to see JR and AS start.

That Josh fumble play was going to be a Dak/Ashton option play, but Josh grabbed the football that Dak was trying to pull back out. I think it would have been a big play.
Posted by TaxmanMSU
a glasscase of emotion
Member since Oct 2012
4217 posts
Posted on 9/18/13 at 10:47 am to
We killed Auburn with the play action, I love it. It was a thing of beauty to see them bite so hard on the fake handoffs, only to have Dak pull the ball and throw out a solid pass on target. What we did before going up 3 points and shitting the bed should be what Mississippi State Football looks like for the entire game, every game..

Posted by jackiewayne
Member since Nov 2012
195 posts
Posted on 9/18/13 at 11:02 am to
Dak

Perk/Shump situational switching
Posted by darkhorse
Member since Aug 2012
7701 posts
Posted on 9/18/13 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

Yeah the guy who adds a third threat and doesn't stand still in the pocket.


What 3rd threat? No passing game with him, No run game outside of him. That's called one dimensional.

quote:

The guy that moved the ball well against an SEC defense before our coaches got scared to score. Yeah that guy.


What?? You mean against the 92nd ranked defense in the nation? I don't care if it's an SEC defense or not. They suck, and we only put up 20 points.

Keep in mind that TR did more last year when their defense was actually better. Ranked 79th. 3 TDs and our RBs didn't suffer.. 182 yards.

Posted by Tds & Beer
TOT DAT MOFAN~DRIP DRIP~Bunty Pls
Member since Sep 2009
23877 posts
Posted on 9/18/13 at 1:26 pm to
Your argument is that auburn's defense was better last year?

Do you read the shite that you post?
Posted by slidog
Tampa, FL
Member since Sep 2011
1046 posts
Posted on 9/18/13 at 1:28 pm to
Posted by darkhorse
Member since Aug 2012
7701 posts
Posted on 9/18/13 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

throw out a solid pass on target.








Posted by darkhorse
Member since Aug 2012
7701 posts
Posted on 9/18/13 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

Your argument is that auburn's defense was better last year?


My argument is that Dak under performed against the 92nd ranked defense in the country. Yet you want to tout it being an SEC defense as if that makes a difference.


I then kept with your logic and compared TR's performance vs Dak's against the defenses of Auburn. A sort of Apples to Apples. If you would rather not do that then fine.


DAK UNDER PERFORMED AGAINST THE 92ND RANKED DEFENSE IN THE NATION. 52.5% COMPLETION... SUCKS arse. NOT GOOD. PISS POOR. He made us 1 dimensional! Proven by the LACK of a passing THREAT against the 92 RANKED defense in the Nation. Proven by the fact that he did not make the option read very well at all against the 92nd ranked defense in the nation.

Now follow this. They are the worst SEC defense we are GOING to face down the stretch.

Posted by Tds & Beer
TOT DAT MOFAN~DRIP DRIP~Bunty Pls
Member since Sep 2009
23877 posts
Posted on 9/18/13 at 1:45 pm to
Darkhorse Darkhorse Darkhorse
Posted by 17theBears
Member since Apr 2012
6990 posts
Posted on 9/18/13 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

92ND RANKED DEFENSE IN THE NATION


link?
Posted by bullpup01
Utopia
Member since Jan 2013
566 posts
Posted on 9/18/13 at 2:16 pm to
Your avi is right on the money.
Posted by Allyn McKeen
Key West, FL
Member since Jun 2012
4699 posts
Posted on 9/18/13 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

My argument is that Dak under performed against the 92nd ranked defense in the country.


You and your stats. AU is the 32nd ranked scoring defense. We did better than average. Dak over performed. See how that works?
Posted by SECROCKS!
Member since Jun 2013
540 posts
Posted on 9/18/13 at 3:02 pm to
Why not T.R. and Dak at the same time
2 qb's back there helping each other out. Would be hell for defenses never knowing who was getting the snap, or when they would hand off to the other qb or qb/rb (dak).
Posted by dawgM2
MS
Member since Jan 2013
4265 posts
Posted on 9/18/13 at 8:35 pm to
quote:

Why not T.R. and Dak at the same time
2 qb's back there helping each other out. Would be hell for defenses never knowing who was getting the snap, or when they would hand off to the other qb or qb/rb (dak).



Posted by slidog
Tampa, FL
Member since Sep 2011
1046 posts
Posted on 9/18/13 at 8:59 pm to
Posted by CoonassBulldog
Member since Sep 2008
6913 posts
Posted on 9/18/13 at 9:29 pm to
quote:

No passing game with him


He threw for over 200 yards...we had over 400 yards of offense.

Russell has accomplished 400 yards in an SEC or BCS game 3 times in 12 starts- Dakota is 1 for 1

Against shitty UPig 4-8
Against shitty Tennessee 5-7
Against shitty Kentucky 2-10

And he had Sr WR's...Dakota did it with inexperienced WR's ON THE ROAD

This post was edited on 9/18/13 at 9:33 pm
Posted by UMRealist
Member since Feb 2013
35906 posts
Posted on 9/18/13 at 9:45 pm to
Posted by dawgM2
MS
Member since Jan 2013
4265 posts
Posted on 9/18/13 at 9:49 pm to
quote:

He threw for over 200 yards...we had over 400 yards of offense.

Russell has accomplished 400 yards in an SEC or BCS game 3 times in 12 starts- Dakota is 1 for 1

Against shitty UPig 4-8
Against shitty Tennessee 5-7
Against shitty Kentucky 2-10

And he had Sr WR's...Dakota did it with inexperienced WR's ON THE ROAD



first pageprev pagePage 2 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter