Started By
Message
re: 2013 Mississippi State football recruiting/commitments thread
Posted on 6/13/12 at 10:22 am to Slippery Slope
Posted on 6/13/12 at 10:22 am to Slippery Slope
quote:
Slippery Slope
What is your name on SPS? There is no one on there with the same humor/posting style that you have.
Posted on 6/13/12 at 10:32 am to Requiem For A Dawg
quote:
What is your name on SPS? There is no one on there with the same humor/posting style that you have.
Mutt the hoople(sp?)
Posted on 6/13/12 at 10:54 am to OBReb6
I think I remember seeing a slippery slope.
Posted on 6/13/12 at 11:00 am to Tds & Beer
If he posted there significantly he would be accused of being a rebel troll (like TheSECWest does to him here).
Posted on 6/13/12 at 11:02 am to OBReb6
sixpack is just hard to read. half the posts over there are people talking shite to each other or the BEARS!!!11
Posted on 6/13/12 at 11:05 am to NIH
I can't tell who's replying to who unless viewing the thread from the outside (maybe I'm a dubmass and have been missing something).
Posted on 6/13/12 at 11:09 am to OBReb6
yeah the format alone makes it almost unreadable.
Posted on 6/13/12 at 11:12 am to Tds & Beer
Yeah and NAFOOM is so dead it's not worth going to
Posted on 6/13/12 at 11:13 am to OBReb6
yeah, TD spoiled me so it's not even worth it to sift through that format.
Posted on 6/13/12 at 11:31 am to Requiem For A Dawg
It's the same as here. I only have like 4 posts.
Posted on 6/13/12 at 11:47 am to NIH
Last year Dawgstudent was thinking about leaving yuku and people were throwing around suggestions. Someone suggested a TD style board and most everyone over there went nuts. They said NOOOO don't take away the threaded view!!!!! And I hate TDs setup etc etc etc. So it stayed the same shitty layout.
Posted on 6/13/12 at 11:50 am to Requiem For A Dawg
It's better than mizzou's board at least. Have you ever seen that garbage?
BYU's is pretty terrible too. I lurked there a little before we played them last year.
BYU's is pretty terrible too. I lurked there a little before we played them last year.
Posted on 6/13/12 at 11:57 am to Requiem For A Dawg
dear god. i don't understand how anyone can like that.
Posted on 6/13/12 at 11:59 am to Slippery Slope
quote:
It's the same as here. I only have like 4 posts.
Wish you could say the same Re:This site.
Posted on 6/13/12 at 12:10 pm to NIH
quote:
Posted by NIH sixpack is just hard to read. half the posts over there are people talking shite to each other or the BEARS!!!11
I agree with this 100%. They have really gone downhill in the last year or so. A lot of good info over there but also a lot of stuff that makes me cringe too.
Posted on 6/13/12 at 12:29 pm to Requiem For A Dawg
I don't know why dawgstudent allows alot of that shite, wasn't that board started for the very reason of getting away from those types?
Posted on 6/13/12 at 12:31 pm to OBReb6
I think boards just get overwhelmed past a certain point.
Posted on 6/13/12 at 12:41 pm to OBReb6
Yes it was, but the influx of Genespagesque posters over there in the past year has been unreal.
Posted on 6/13/12 at 12:52 pm to OBReb6
quote:
I don't know why dawgstudent allows alot of that shite, wasn't that board started for the very reason of getting away from those types?
Sixpack was formed to get away from constant sunshine pumping from jeanspage and Jean's Gestapo techniques.
At that time, football had fallen off of a cliff- we went from being one of the best in the West to awful literally overnight.
Also, Stansbury had nearly been fired for the way he was running the program- but then he started his run from 2002-2005 that he lived off of until being fired last March. And you had me bashing him , pointing out what he didnt do well- which gave them plenty of fodder to post about.
And to top it off, we hired Polk back and it was not an all that popular decision by people that kept up with baseball.
Sixpack is not as good when we are winning. There are less things to argue about. Just the way it is. SECRant provides some info- but it is mostly a trollfest- so I dont see how you can act like this board is great either.
As to the format- I prefer SPS to this one because I can look at the thread and see what people reply to. This format just allows you to see the name to reply- but if the person posts multiple times or doesnt quote- you have no idea what someone is replying to. Just my view
This post was edited on 6/13/12 at 12:53 pm
Popular
Back to top



2





