Started By
Message
Can I get a ruling on why the anchor?
Posted on 10/11/16 at 11:58 am
Posted on 10/11/16 at 11:58 am
LINK
The thread about Tim Williams, comparing him to other UA players.
Because the same players kept being mentioned?
Because it wasn't a troll or about LSU/UF?
Some whiney posters kept RA'ing because it was discussing a Bama player?
Just wondering so I can help do my part to MTDGA.
Thanks in advance.
The thread about Tim Williams, comparing him to other UA players.
Because the same players kept being mentioned?
Because it wasn't a troll or about LSU/UF?
Some whiney posters kept RA'ing because it was discussing a Bama player?
Just wondering so I can help do my part to MTDGA.
Thanks in advance.

Posted on 10/11/16 at 12:17 pm to Titus Pullo
Don't know for sure but it might be the quoted reason below. It's a little gray IMO. I can see your thread title being descriptive enough, but it's can also be considered a slight cliffhanger.
quote:
2. The subject of the thread is cut off. This is also referred to as "Cliffhanger Subjects". This is a problem that has been popping up a lot lately. A user will post a subject such as:
"The key to winning the game is..."
or
"I am about to get torn to shreds but I think that"
For whatever reasons, the user cut the subject off and is requiring that the reader click on the thread to find out what the point of the thread is. We would rather the main idea of the thread to be inside the subject.
Posted on 10/11/16 at 12:50 pm to LewDawg
I thought about that. I guess I should have put "....since who?" Instead of "....since....".
No big deal. Just wondering so I could avoid it going forward.
Thanks.
No big deal. Just wondering so I could avoid it going forward.
Thanks.

Posted on 10/11/16 at 1:35 pm to LewDawg
Nah, no big deal. I was mainly just wondering for future reference.
It's about cashed at this point anyway.
It's about cashed at this point anyway.
Popular
Back to top
