Started By
Message
re: TU is all hat and no cattle
Posted on 9/2/21 at 3:44 pm to BigBro
Posted on 9/2/21 at 3:44 pm to BigBro
No
And you stretched the truth tremendously in your “summary”
In the playoff and bcs periods half of your “successful moments”. Would not have occurred.
But you danced around whether you consider 4 losses per season or 5 losses per season a successful 10 year period
And you stretched the truth tremendously in your “summary”
In the playoff and bcs periods half of your “successful moments”. Would not have occurred.
But you danced around whether you consider 4 losses per season or 5 losses per season a successful 10 year period
3
Posted on 9/2/21 at 3:50 pm to Old Sarge
Tell me all about A&Ms successful moments during the BCS and playoffs?
Posted on 9/2/21 at 3:56 pm to Old Sarge
quote:
And you stretched the truth tremendously in your “summary”
Where exactly did I stretch the truth in my summary? It was factual. 2 decades were successful.. 1 was decent.. and 2 were not successful.
quote:
But you danced around whether you consider 4 losses per season or 5 losses per season a successful 10 year period
I didn’t dance around it at all. I don’t care about average losses per decade at all. If we win a NC in a decade, it is successful. Outside of that, it takes several CC to be decent.. otherwise it is not successful.
I realize why you define success that way, but average number of losses is meaningless to me.
Posted on 9/2/21 at 3:59 pm to Old Sarge
quote:
In the playoff and bcs periods half of your “successful moments”. Would not have occurred.
This makes no sense to me..
Are you saying that #1 Texas wouldn’t have made the playoffs or BCS in 1970 or 1977?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News