Started By
Message
re: The underachiever tiers of college football
Posted on 8/9/21 at 3:24 pm to Champs
Posted on 8/9/21 at 3:24 pm to Champs
The entire UGA AD underachieved.
Forget the Nattys in football for a moment, it's almost inconceivable for UGA to continually suck as bad as they do at basketball.
I'm also unclear on why Notre Dame, USC and Oklahoma don't appear on that list. If losing in the playoffs is failure, then ND and OK are failures right along with UGA. USC is also a long way removed from the ultimate success.
Forget the Nattys in football for a moment, it's almost inconceivable for UGA to continually suck as bad as they do at basketball.
I'm also unclear on why Notre Dame, USC and Oklahoma don't appear on that list. If losing in the playoffs is failure, then ND and OK are failures right along with UGA. USC is also a long way removed from the ultimate success.
1
Posted on 8/9/21 at 3:50 pm to TN Dawg2
quote:Not 1980 long. USC? Really? You're comparing USC's gazillion national titles and heisman trophy winners to Georgia?
I'm also unclear on why Notre Dame, USC and Oklahoma don't appear on that list. If losing in the playoffs is failure, then ND and OK are failures right along with UGA. USC is also a long way removed from the ultimate success.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News