re: 15 of the Top-100 just signed with 1 school.

quote:

---

So basically you're saying even though everyone has the same number of recruits (25 yearly, with 85 total roster), Alabama should be restricted to how good they collectively are?...Who decides how good each player is?
A "talent cap"!WTF!

---

The concept is this, You take the 24/7 composite score for each athlete the year they sign. This is their base score. You can only have a total of so many point overall on your roster. FWIW, 24/7 already does this with their talent composite score. Based on the number there today, I think a good number would be around 850, which would be an average of a top 10-15 class every year. However the teams would want to structure their teams under the cap would be their choice.

Top teams would still get the (5*) top guys. Where this would start to kick in and start to equalize things would be with the 3* and 4* players. It would give more of those guys a shot at the top teams. It would make the talent evaluation process even more important. Teams would start to look for the undervalued players to give them relief under the cap.

I would also be open to a reevaluation process for players depending on their year performance.

It's just an idea. It's not perfect. But the object is to provide a little more parity for the teams in college football (like the NFL). Everyone is tired of the same 4-6 teams being in the CFP conversation every year. We can continue down the same path, or we can do something different.